Interest and Expertise Moderate the Relationship between Right–Wing Attitudes,Ideological Self

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that the association between right–wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) is moderated by political interest and involvement. It is here hypothesized that interest also strengthens the association of authoritarianism with political self–placement and that higher levels of interest in politics shape voting choices that are more strongly associated with authoritarianism. Authoritarianism was defined as a second–order factor reflecting onto SDO and RWA in a structural equation modelling approach. In Study 1 (two samples, total N = 873), interest was found to moderate the impact of authoritarianism, as hypothesized. In Study 2 (N = 721), a higher order interaction involving interest and political expertise was detected. These results were obtained with different measures and in different electoral campaigns. The motivational and cognitive underpinnings of the moderating effects are discussed. Copyright © 2012 European Association of Personality Psychology.

Keywords

authoritarianism social dominance interest expertise moderation analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

A. I.

, & Saunders

K. L.

(2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555.

Adorno

T. W.

, Frenkel–Brunswick

, Levinson

, & Sandford

R. N.

(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper Book.

Aiello

, Chirumbolo

, & Leone

(2004). La scala di autoritarismo di destra (Altemeyer, 1998): Uno studio di adattamento e validazione [The right–wing authoritarian scale: An adaptation and a validation]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 21, 73–91.

Aiello

, Leone

, Chirumbolo

, & Pratto

(2005). Uno studio di Adattamento e Validazione della Scala di Orientamento/Tendenza alia Dominanza Sociale (Pratto et al., 1994) [A study for the validation of the social dominance orientation scale]. Rassegna di Psicologia, 22, 65–75.

Ainley

M. D.

, Hidi

, & Berndoff

(2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other ‘authoritarian personality.’ In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

Bagozzi

R. P.

, & Heatherton

T. F.

(1994). A general approach to representing multi–faceted personality constructs: Application to state self–esteem. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 35–67.

10.

Bartle

(1997). Political awareness and heterogeneity in models of voting: Some evidence from the British election studies. British Elections and Parties Review, 7, 1–22.

11.

Bergami

, & Bagozzi

R. P.

(2000). Self–categorization and commitment as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to antecedents and consequences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.

12.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

13.

Cohrs

J. C.

, & Stelzl

(2010). How ideological attitudes predict host society members’ attitudes toward immigrants: Exploring cross–national differences. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 673–694.

14.

Cohrs

J. C.

, Moschner

, Maes

, & Kielmann

(2005). The motivational bases of right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434.

15.

Converse

P. E.

(1964). The nature of the belief systems in mass publics. In Apter

D. E.

(Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 75–169). New York, NY: Free Press.

16.

Dallago

, Cima

, Roccato

, Ricolfi

, & Mirisola

(2008). The correlation between right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: The moderating effects of political and religious identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30 (4), 362–68.

17.

Delli Carpini

M. X.

, & Keeter

(1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual process cognitive–motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 41–113.

19.

Duckitt

, Wagner

, du Plessis

, & Birum

(2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual–process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.

20.

Duriez

, Van Hiel

, & Kossowska

(2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the socio–political context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26, 299–320.

21.

Ekehammar

, Akrami

, Gylje

, & Zakrisson

(2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right–wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482.

22.

Federico

C. M.

, & Goren

(2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In Jost

J. T.

, Kay

A. C.

, & Thorisdottir

(Eds), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267–291). New York: Oxford University Press.

23.

Federico

C. M.

, & Hunt

C. V.

(in press). Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation. Political Behavior, DOI: 10.1007/s11109-011-9184-7.

24.

Federico

C. M.

, Fisher

E. L.

, & Deason

(2011). Expertise and ideological consequences of the authoritarian predisposition. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 686–708.

25.

Federico

C. M.

, Hunt

C. V.

, & Ergun

(2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating “competitive jungles” and “dangerous worlds” into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22, 259–279.

26.

Feldman

(1989). Measuring issue preferences: The problem of response instability. Political Analysis, 1, 25–60.

27.

Fiske

S. T.

, Lau

R. R.

, & Smith

R. A.

(1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition, 8, 31–48.

28.

Funke

(2005). The dimensionality of right–wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.

29.

Gilens

(2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preference. American Political Science Review, 95, 379–396.

30.

Guo

, & Moy

(1998). Medium or message? Predicting dimensions of political sophistication. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 25–50.

31.

, & Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cut–off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

32.

Izard

C. E.

, & Ackerman

B. P.

(2000). Motivational, organizational, and regulatory and functions of discrete emotions. In Lewis

, & Haviland–Jones

(Eds), Handbook of emotions (2nd edn, pp. 523–264). New York: Guliford Press.

33.

Jaccard

, & Wan

C. K.

(1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348–357.

34.

Joreskog

K. G.

(2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software.

35.

Jost

J. T.

, Federico

C. M.

, & Napier

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, function, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

36.

Judd

C. M.

, & Milburn

M. A.

(1980). The structure of attitude systems in the general public: Comparisons of a structural equation model. American Sociological Review, 45, 627–643.

37.

Judd

C. M.

, Krosnick

J. A.

, & Milburn

M. A.

(1981). Political involvement and attitude structure in the general public. American Sociological Review, 46, 660–669.

38.

Krosnick

J. A.

(1990). Lessons learned: A review and integration of our findings. Social Cognition, 8, 154–158.

39.

Leone

, Chirumbolo

, & Desimoni

(2012). The impact of the HEXACO personality model in predicting socio–political attitudes: The moderating role of interest in politics. Personality and Individual Differences 52, 416–421.

40.

Little

T. D.

, Cunningham

W. A.

, Shahar

, & Widaman

K. F.

(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

41.

Luskin

R. C.

(1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331–361.

42.

Marsh

H. W.

, Hau

K. T.

, Balla

J. R.

, & Grayson

(1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220.

43.

Mirisola

, Sibley

C. G.

, Boca

, & Duckitt

(2007). On the ideological consistency between right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(7), 1851–1862.

44.

Neuman

W. R.

(1986). The paradox of mass publics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

45.

Perry

, & Sibley

C. G.

(2012). Big–Five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right–wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 3–8.

46.

Peterson

B. E.

, Smirles

K. A.

, & Wentworth

P. A.

(1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1202–1216.

47.

Pratto

, Sidanius

, Stallworth

L. M.

, & Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

48.

Prior

(2010). You've either got it or you don't? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72, 747–766.

49.

Reise

S. P.

, Widaman

K. F.

, & Pugh

R. H.

(1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.

50.

Renninger

K. A.

(2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In Sansone

, & Harackiewitz

J. M.

(Eds), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. (pp. 375–407) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

51.

Roccato

, & Ricolfi

(2005). On the correlation between right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 187–200.

52.

Roccato

, Mirisola

, & Chirumbolo

(2009). La rilevazione empirica dell'Autoritarismo. Un adattamento italiano della scala di Funke (2005) [The empiric measurement of authoritarianism. An Italian adaptation of the Funke’ (2005) scale]. Psicologia Sociale, 4(1), 157–173.

53.

Roets

, Van Hiel

, Cornelis

, & Soetens

(2008). Determinants of task performance and invested effort: A need for closure by relative cognitive capacity interaction analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 779–792.

54.

Sansone

, & Thoman

D. B.

(2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self–regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186.

55.

Satorra

, & Bentler

P. M.

(2001). A scaled difference chi–square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.

56.

Sibley

, Wilson

M. S.

, & Duckitt

(2007). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right–wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five–month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357–371.

57.

Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta–analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 12, 248–279.

58.

Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(2010). The personality bases of ideology: A one–year longitudinal study. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 540–559.

59.

Sibley

C. G.

, & Duckitt

(in press). Personality geneses of authoritarianism: The form and function of Openness to Experience. In Funke

, Petzel

, Cohrs

J. C.

, & Duckitt

(Eds.) Perspectives on authoritarianism. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS–Verlag.

60.

Sibley

C. G.

, Wilson

, & Duckitt

(2007). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five–month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357–371.

61.

Silvia

P. J.

(2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5, 89–102.

62.

Silvia

P. J.

(2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 57–60.

63.

Steenkamp

J. E. M.

, & Baumgartner

(1998). Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.

64.

Tilley

, Sturgis

, & Allum

(2004). Political information and motivation: A case of reciprocal causality? Paper presented at symposium on ‘Perceptions preferences and rationalization: overcoming the problem of causal inference in the study of political behaviour’, Nuffield College, Oxford, 7–8 May 2004.

65.

Vandenberg

R. J.

, & Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.

66.

Zaller

(1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 125–153.

Interest and Expertise Moderate the Relationship between Right–Wing Attitudes,Ideological Self–Placement and Voting

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References