Future Time Perspective and Gratitude in Daily Life: A Micro

Abstract

Preliminary cross–sectional evidence suggests that future time perspective (FTP) is associated with dispositional gratitude, but research on daily perceptions of FTP and their relations to daily gratitude is lacking. In this study, we addressed this gap by examining how FTP and gratitude jointly unfold in daily life and how these relations vary within and across individuals. A micro–longitudinal design (N = 331, adults aged 18–77) with daily assessments over two workweeks was employed to examine the relations between gratitude and two components of FTP (remaining opportunities and time). Three important results from random intercepts cross–lagged panel models stand out. First, we found evidence for within–person day–to–day carry–over effects in FTP and gratitude. Second, FTP and gratitude were systematically related within and across individuals. Third, age and dispositional forms of FTP and gratitude predicted between–person differences in FTP and gratitude in daily life. Finally, exploratory multilevel analyses have shown that the associations between daily FTP and gratitude vary across ages at the between–person level but not at the within–person level. Overall, these findings advance our understanding of perceptions of FTP in daily life and their associations with gratitude in adulthood. © 2019 European Association of Personality Psychology

Keywords

future time perspective gratitude within-person processes in daily life micro-longitudinal study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algoe

S. B.

, Haidt

, & Gable

S. L.

(2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528–3542.8.3.425.

Allemand

, & Hill

P. L.

(2016). Gratitude from early adulthood to old age. Journal of Personality, 48, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12134

Allemand

, Hill

P. L.

, Ghaemmaghami

, & Martin

(2012). Forgivingness and subjective well–being in adulthood: The moderating role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.004.

Allemand

, & Martin

(2016). On correlated change in personality. European Psychologist, 21, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016–9040/a000256.

Bolger

, & Laurenceau

J. P.

(2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.

Brothers

, Chui

, & Diehl

(2014). Measuring future time perspective across adulthood: Development and evaluation of a short multidimensional questionnaire. The Gerontologist, 54, 1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu076.

Brothers

, Gabrian

, Wahl

H.–W.

, & Diehl

(2016). Future time perspective and awareness of age–related change: Examining their role in predicting psychological well–being. Psychology and Aging, 31, 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000101.

Carstensen

L. L.

(2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488.

Carstensen

L. L.

, Isaacowitz

D. M.

, & Charles

S. T.

(1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.54.3.165.

10.

Cate

R. A.

, & John

O. P.

(2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.22.1.186.

11.

Cheung

G. W.

, & Rensvold

R. B.

(1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500101.

12.

Chopik

W. J.

, Newton

N. J.

, Ryan

L. H.

, Kashdan

T. B.

, & Jarden

A. J.

(2017). Whereas others studies found no age differences in dispositional gratitude (Wood, Maltby, Stewart, & Joseph, 2008),

13.

Cranford

J. A.

, Shrout

P. E.

, Iida

, Rafaeli

, Yip

, & Bolger

(2006). A procedure evaluating sensitivity to within–person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287721.

14.

Curran

P. J.

, Howard

A. L.

, Bainter

S. A.

, Lane

S. T.

, & McGinley

J. S.

(2014). The separation of between–person and within–person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035297.

15.

Davis

W. E.

, & Hicks

J. A.

(2013). Maintaining hope at the 11th hour: Authenticity buffers the effect of limited time perspective on hope. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1634–1646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213500150.

16.

Demeyer

, & De Raedt

(2014). The effect of future time perspective manipulation on affect and attentional bias. Cognitive Therapy Research, 38, 302–312.

17.

Emmons

R. A.

, & McCullough

M. E.

(2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well–being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.84.2.377.

18.

Emmons

R. A.

, & McCullough

M. E.

(2004). The psychology of gratitude. Oxford: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.001.0001.

19.

Emmons

R. A.

, & Mishra

(2012). Why gratitude enhances well–being: What we know, what we need to know. In Sheldon

, Kashdan

, & Steger

M. F.

(Eds.), Designing the future of positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 248–262). New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Fleeson

(2001). Toward a structure– and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.80.6.1011.

21.

Fleeson

, & Jayawickreme

(2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.

22.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(1998). What good are positive emotions. Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.2.3.300.

23.

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2004). Gratitude, like other positive emotions, broadens and builds. In Emmons

R. A.

, & McCullough

M. E.

(Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 145–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.003.0008.

24.

Fung

H. H.

, & Carstensen

L. L.

(2006). Goals change when life's fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11th attacks and SARS. Social Cognition, 24, 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.248.

25.

Fung

H. H.

, Carstensen

L. L.

, & Lutz

A. M.

(1999). Influence of time on social preferences: Implications for life–span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.14.4.595.

26.

Gordon

A. M.

, Impett

E. A.

, Kogan

, Oveis

, & Keltner

(2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028723.

27.

Grühn

, Sharifian

, & Chu

(2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31, 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000060.

28.

Hamaker

E. L.

, Kuiper

R. M.

, & Grasman

R. P. P. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross–lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.

29.

Hicks

J. A.

, Trent

, Davis

W. E.

, & King

L. A.

(2012). Positive affect, meaning in life, and future time perspective: An application of socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 27, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023965.

30.

Hill

P. L.

, Allemand

, & Roberts

B. W.

(2013). Examining the pathways between gratitude and self–rated physical health across adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.011.

31.

Hill

P. L.

, Katana

, & Allemand

(2018). Investigating the affective signature of forgivingness across the adult years. Research in Human Development, 15, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2017.1414526.

32.

Hoppmann

C. A.

, Infurna

F. J.

, Ram

, & Gerstorf

(2017). Associations among individuals’ perceptions of future time, individual resources, and subjective well–being in old age. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv063.

33.

L. T.

, & Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

34.

Judge

T. A.

, Simon

L. S.

, Hurst

, & Kelley

(2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within–individual variation in the five–factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034485.

35.

Kooij

D. T. A. M.

, de Lange

A. H.

, Jansen

P. G. W.

, & Dikkers

J. S. E.

(2013). Beyond chronological age: Examining perceived future time and subjective health as age–related mediators in relation to work–related motivations and well–being. Work and Stress, 27, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.769328.

36.

Kooij

D. T. A. M.

, Kanfer

, Betts

, & Rudolph

C. W.

(2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 867–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306.

37.

Kozik

, Hoppmann

C. A.

, & Gerstorf

(2015). Future time perspective: Opportunities and limitations are differentially associated with subjective well–being and hair cortisol concentration. Gerontology, 61, 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368716.

38.

Lambert

N. M.

, & Fincham

F. D.

(2011). Expressing gratitude to a partner leads to more relationship maintenance behavior. Emotion, 11, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021557.

39.

Lang

F. R.

, & Carstensen

L. L.

(2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.17.1.125.

40.

Liao

H.–W.

, & Carstensen

L. L.

(2018). Future time perspective: Time horizons and beyond. Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 31, 163–167.

41.

MacCallum

R. C.

, Browne

M. W.

, & Sugawara

H. M.

(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082–989X.1.2.130.

42.

McCullough

M. E.

, Emmons

R. A.

, & Tsang

J.–A.

(2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.82.1.112.

43.

McCullough

M. E.

, Tsang

J. A.

, & Emmons

R. A.

(2004). Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: Links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.86.2.295.

44.

Molenaar

P. C. M.

(2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back to scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.

45.

Molenaar

P. C. M.

, & Campbell

C. G.

(2009). The new person–specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01619.x.

46.

Mroczek

D. K.

, Stawski

R. S.

, Turiano

N. A.

, Chan

, Almeida

D. M.

, Neupert

S. D.

, & Spiro

III (2015). Emotional reactivity and mortality: Longitudinal findings from the VA normative aging study. The Journals of Gerontology B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70, 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt107.

47.

Muthen

B. O.

(1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003006.

48.

Muthén

L. K.

, & Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus user's guide (Eight ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

49.

Roberts

B. W.

, & Jackson

J. J.

(2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2008.00530.x.

50.

Robinson

M. D.

, & Clore

G. L.

(2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self–report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.83.1.198.

51.

Rohr

M. K.

, John

D. T.

, Fung

H. H.

, & Lang

F. R.

(2017). A three–component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 32, 597–607.

52.

Satorra

, & Bentler

P. M.

(2001). A scaled difference chi–square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296192.

53.

Shrout

P. E.

, & Lane

S. P.

(2012). Psychometrics. In Mehl

M. R.

, & Conner

T. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). New York: Guilford Press.

54.

Sliwinski

M. J.

, Almeida

D. M.

, Smyth

, & Stawski

R. S.

(2009). Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: Findings from two measurement–burst diary studies. Psychology and Aging, 24, 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017925.

55.

Sliwinski

M. J.

, Smyth

J. M.

, Hofer

S. M.

, & Stawski

R. S.

(2006). Intraindividual coupling of stress and cognition. Psychology and Aging, 21, 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.21.3.545.

56.

Watkins

P. C.

(2014). Gratitude and the good life: Toward a psychology of appreciation. New York: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94–007–7253–3.

57.

Watkins

P. C.

, Van Gekder

, & Frias

(2009). Furthering the science of gratitude. In Lopez

J. J.

, & Snyder

C. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 437–445). New York: Oxford University Press.

58.

Windsor

T. D.

, Fiori

K. L.

, & Crisp

D. A.

(2011). Personal and neighborhood resources, future time perspective, and social relations in middle– and older–adulthood. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67, 423–431.

59.

Wood

A. M.

, Froh

J. J.

, & Geraghty

A. W. A.

(2010). Gratitude and well–being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005.

60.

Wood

A. M.

, Joseph

, Lloyd

, & Atkins

(2009). Gratitude influences sleep through the mechanism of pre–sleep cognitions. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 66, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.002.

61.

Wood

A. M.

, Maltby

, Stewart

, & Joseph

(2008). Conceptualizing gratitude and appreciation as a unitary personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 619–630.

62.

Wood

A. M.

, Maltby

, Stewart

, Linley

P. A.

, & Joseph

(2008). A social–cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude. Emotion, 8, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528–3542.8.2.281.

63.

Zacher

, & Frese

(2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015425.

64.

Zacher

, Heusner

, Schmitz

, Zwierzanska

M. M.

, & Frese

(2010). Focus on opportunities as a mediator of the relationships between age, job complexity, and work performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.09.001.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB

Future Time Perspective and Gratitude in Daily Life: A Micro–Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material