How similar are the conceptual and empirical structures of personality traits?

Abstract

The congruity of the conceptual and empirical structures of personality traits was examined by comparing the structure of trait covariation ratings to the five‐factor structure of self‐reported traits. The covariation ratings were found to be highly reliable, and no evidence of systematic sex or age differences was found. Besides a rough similarity, there were replicable differences between the conceptual and empirical structures. Most importantly, Neuroticism and Extraversion had a weak negative correlation in self‐reports, but were judged to be almost bipolar opposites in covariation ratings; impulsiveness was judged to be a negative indicator of Conscientiousness in covariation ratings, but was equally strongly related to Neuroticism component in self‐ratings. These systematic differences demonstrate that the structure of self‐rated traits is not reducible to semantic similarities of traits descriptors. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

implicit personality theory personality traits personality structure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(1977).Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base‐rate information on prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5,303–314.

Allik

Realo

(1997).Emotional experience and its relation to the Five‐Factor Model in Estonian. Journal of Personality, 65,625–647.

Block

Weiss

D. S.

Thorne

(1979).How relevant is a semantic similarity interpretation of personality ratings? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,1055–1074.

Borkenau

(1988).The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 22,337–352.

Borkenau

(1992).Implicit personality theory and the five‐factor model. Journal of Personality, 60,295–327.

Borkenau

Liebler

(1993).Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self‐ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65,546–553.

Borkenau

Liebler

(1994).The factor structure of trait ratings depends on the extent of information available to the judges. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44,3–7.

Borkenau

Ostendorf

(1987).Retrospective estimates of act frequencies: How accurately do they reflect reality? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,626–638.

Borkenau

Riemann

Angleitner

Spinath

F. M.

(2001).Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adult twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80,655–668.

10.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor inventory (NEO‐FFI). Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

11.

D'Andrade

(1965).Trait psychology and componential analysis. American Anthropologist, 67,215–228.

12.

Efron

(2003).Eigenvalue‐based estimators for optimal dimensionality reduction in information retrieval. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

13.

Hakel

M. D.

(1969).Significance of implicit personality theories for personality research and theory. Proceedings of the 77th Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4,403–404.

14.

Horn

J. L.

(1965).A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30,179–185.

15.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1972).Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3,430–454.

16.

Kallasmaa

Allik

Realo

McCrae

R. R.

(2000).The Estonian version of the NEO‐PI‐R: An examination of universal and culture‐specific aspects of the Five‐Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 14,265–278.

17.

Kiers

H. A. L.

Van Mechelen

(2001).Three‐way component analysis: Principles and illustrative application. Pschological Methods, 6,84–110.

18.

Klein

S. B.

Loftus

Kihlstrom

J. F.

(1996).Self‐knowledge of an amnesic patient: Toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125,250–260.

19.

Klein

S. B.

Loftus

(1993). The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self. In T. K. Srull , & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition(Vol. 5, pp.1–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Konstabel

Aavik

Allik

(2006).Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. Manuscript accepted for publication. European Journal of Personality.

21.

McCrae

R. R

Zonderman

A. B.

Costa

P. T.

Bond

M. H.

Paunonen

S. V.

(1996).Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,552–566.

22.

McCrae

R. R.

John

O. P.

(1992).An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60,175–215.

23.

Muraven

Baumeister

R. F.

(2000).Self‐regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self‐control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126,247–259.

24.

Paulhus

D. L.

Bruce

M. N.

(1995).Effects of self‐presentation strategies on personality profiles and their structure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21,100–108.

25.

Peabody

(1987).Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52,59–71.

26.

Peabody

Goldberg

L. R.

(1989).Some determinants of factor structures from personality‐trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,552–567.

27.

Read

S. J.

Miller

L. C.

(1993).Rapist or “regular guy”: Explanatory coherence in the construction of mental models of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19,526–541.

28.

Reisenzein

Schimmack

(1999).Similarity judgments and covariations of affects: Findings and implications for affect structure research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25,539–555.

29.

Schimmack

Reisenzein

(1997).Cognitive processes involved in similarity judgments of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73,645–661.

30.

Semin

G. R.

(1990). Everyday assumptions, language and personality. In G. R. Semin , & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Everyday understanding: Social and scientific implications. Inquiries in social construction(pp.151–175).

31.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979).Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86,420–428.

32.

Shweder

R. A.

(1975).How relevant is an individual difference theory of personality? Journal of Personality, 43,455–485.

33.

Sneed

C. D.

McCrae

R. R.

Funder

D. C.

(1998).Lay conceptions of the five‐factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24,115–126.

34.

Tice

D. M.

Bratslavsky

Baumeister

R. F.

(2001).Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80,53–67.

35.

Wiggins

J. S.

(1973). Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.