Culture and the behavioural manifestations of traits: an application of the Act Frequency Approach

Abstract

The behavioural manifestations of Big Five traits were compared across cultures using the Act Frequency Approach. American (n = 176) and Filipino (n = 195) students completed a Big Five measure and act frequency ratings for behaviours performed during the past month. Acts for specific traits cohered to an equivalent degree across cultures. In both cultures, the structure of act composites resembled the Big Five and the strength of trait‐behaviour relationships was very similar. Many acts were multidimensional and analyses revealed cultural commonalities and differences in the relevance and prevalence of acts for the Big Five traits. The results were more consistent with trait than cultural psychology perspectives, because traits predicted behaviour equally well, on average, in the two cultures. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

culture traits Act Frequency Approach Big Five

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amelang

Herboth

Oefner

. (1991).A prototype strategy for the construction of a creativity scale. European Journal of Personality, 5,261–285.

Angleitner

Buss

D. M.

Demtröder

A. I

. (1990).A cross‐cultural comparison using the act frequency approach (AFA) in West Germany and the United States. European Journal of Personality, 4,187–207.

Angleitner

Demtröder

A. I

. (1988).Acts and dispositions: A reconsideration of the act frequency approach. European Journal of Personality, 2,121–141.

Ashton

M. C.

Lee

Perugini

Szarota

de Vries

R. E.

Di Blas

Boies

De Raad

. (2004).A six‐factor structure of personality‐descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,356–366.

Block

. (1989).Critique of the act frequency approach to personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,234–245.

Borkenau

. (1986).Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,371–381.

Borkenau

Müller

. (1992).Inferring act frequencies and traits from behavior observations. Journal of Personality, 60,553–573.

Botwin

M. D.

Buss

D. M

. (1989).Structure of act‐report data: Is the five‐factor model of personality recaptured? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56,988–1001.

Buss

D. M.

Craik

K. H

. (1983a).The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90,105–126.

10.

Buss

D. M.

Craik

K. H

. (1983b).The dispositional analysis of everyday conduct. Journal of Personality, 51,393–412.

11.

Buss

D. M.

Craik

K. H

. (1989).On the cross‐cultural examination of acts and dispositions. European Journal of Personality, 3,19–30.

12.

Butcher, J. N. (Ed.). (1996). International adaptations of the MMPI‐2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Byrne

B. M

. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Chan

. (2000).Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton Adaption‐Innovation Inventory using multiple‐group mean and covariance structure analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35,169–199.

15.

Chinese Culture Connection. (1987).Chinese values and the search for culture‐free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 18,143–164.

16.

Church

A. T

. (1987).Personality research in a non‐Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102,272–292.

17.

Church

A. T

. (2000).Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68,651–703.

18.

Church

A. T.

Katigbak

M. S

. (1992).The cultural context of academic motives: A comparison of American and Filipino college students. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 23,40–58.

19.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R

. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

20.

del Pilar

G. H

. (1998).L'extraversion en psychologie differentielle et l'extratension au Test De Rorschach [Extraversion in differential psychology and Rorschach extratension]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris X‐Nanterre.

21.

Ellis

B. B

. (1990). Extension and evaluation of the Humphreys/Hulin emic item identification hypothesis using item response theory. In P. J. D. Drenth , J. A. Sergeant , & R. J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology(Vol. 1, pp.43–55). New York: John Wiley.

22.

Ellis

B. B.

Becker

Kimmel

H. D

. (1993).An item response theory evaluation of an English version of the Trier Personality Inventory (TPI). Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 24,133–148.

23.

Engelhard

Hansche

Rutledge

K. E

. (1990).Accuracy of bias review judges in identifying differential item functioning on teacher certification tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 3,347–360.

24.

Gosling

S. D.

John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

Craik

K. H

. (1998).Do people know how they behave? Self‐reported act frequencies compared with on‐line codings by observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1337–1349.

25.

Greenfield

P. M

. (1997). Culture as process: Empirical methods for cultural psychology. In J. W. Berry , Y. H. Poortinga , & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross‐cultural psychology: Theory and method(2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp.301–346). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

26.

Heine

S. J

. (2001).Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves. Journal of Personality, 69,881–906.

27.

Hofstede

. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

Huang

C. D.

Church

A. T.

Katigbak

M. S

. (1997).Identifying cultural differences in items and traits: Differential item functioning in the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 28,192–218.

29.

Kanagawa

Cross

S. E.

Markus

H. R

. (2001).“Who am I?”: The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,90–103.

30.

Katigbak

M. S.

Church

A. T.

Akamine

T. X

. (1996).Cross‐cultural generalizability of personality dimensions: Relating indigenous and imported dimensions in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,99–114.

31.

Katigbak

M. S.

Church

A. T.

Guanzon‐Lapeña

M. A.

Carlota

A. J.

del Pilar

G. H

. (2002).Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five‐factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82,89–101.

32.

Lagmay

A. V

. (1993).Bahala na. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 26,31–36.

33.

Levine

L. J.

Prohaska

Burgess

S. L.

Rice

J. A.

Laulhere

T. M

. (2001).Remembering past emotions: The role of current appraisals. Cognition and Emotion, 15,393–417.

34.

Lynch

. (1973). Social acceptance reconsidered. In F. Lynch & A. de Guzman II (Eds.), Four readings on Philippine values(4th ed.Rev. and enlarged, IPC Papers No. 2, pp.1–68). Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University, Institute of Philippine Culture.

35.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

. (1991).Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98,224–253.

36.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

. (1998).The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 29,63–87.

37.

McCrae

R. R

. (2000).Trait psychology and the revival of personality and culture studies. American Behavioral Scientist, 44,10–31.

38.

McCrae

R. R

. (2002). NEO‐PI‐R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae , & J. Allik (Eds.), The five‐factor model across cultures(pp.105–125) New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

39.

McCrae, R. R. , & Allik, J. (Eds.). (2002). The five‐factor model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

40.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five‐factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five‐factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives(pp.51–87). New York: Guilford.

41.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

del Pilar

G. Y.

Rolland

J.‐P.

Parker

W. D

. (1998).Cross‐cultural assessment of the five‐factor model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 29,171–188.

42.

McCrae

R. R.

Terracciano

79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Culture Project. (2005).Personality profiles across cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89,407–425.

43.

Morling

Kitayama

Miyamoto

. (2002).Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,311–323.

44.

Moser

. (1989).The act‐frequency approach: A conceptual critique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15,73–83.

45.

Moskowitz

D. S

. (1994).Cross‐situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,921–933.

46.

Moskowitz

D. S.

Zuroff

D. C

. (2004).Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86,880–893.

47.

Poortinga

Y. H.

van de Vijver

F. J. R.

van Hemert

D. A

. (2002). Cross‐cultural equivalence of the Big Five. In R. R. McCrae , & J. Allik (Eds.), The five‐factor model across cultures(pp.281–302). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

48.

Rolland

J.‐P

. (2002). The cross‐cultural generalizability of the five‐factor model of personality. In R. R. McCrae , & J. Allik (Eds.), The five‐factor model across cultures(pp.7–28). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

49.

Rosero

Luengo

M. A.

Carrillo‐de‐la‐Peña

M. T.

Otero‐López

J. M

. (1994).The act frequency approach to the study of impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 8,119–133.

50.

Schmit

M. J.

Kihm

J. A.

Robie

. (2002). The Global Personality Inventory (GPI). In B. de Raad , & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment(pp.195–236). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.

51.

Schwartz

S. H

. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim , H. C. Triandis , C. Kagitçibasi , S. C. Choi , & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications(pp.85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

52.

Shweder

R. A

. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

53.

Shweder

R. A.

Sullivan

M. A

. (1993).Cultural psychology: Who needs it? Annual Review of Psychology, 44,497–523.

54.

Stone

A. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

Broderick

J. E.

Shiffman

S. S

. (2005).Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31,1340–1346.

55.

Stone

A. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

Shiffman

Neale

J. M.

Marco

C. A.

Hickcox

Paty

Porter

L. S.

Cruise

L. J

. (1998).A comparison of coping assessed by ecological momentary assessment and retrospective recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,1670–1680.

56.

Triandis

H. C

. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

57.

Triandis

H. C

. (2000).Dialectics between cultural and cross‐cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3,185–195.

58.

Triandis

H. C.

Suh

E. M

. (2002).Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53,133–160.

59.

van Leest

P. F

. (1997).Bias and equivalence research in the Netherlands. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47,319–329.

60.

Werner

P. D.

Pervin

L. A

. (1986).The content of personality inventory items. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,622–628.

61.

Willmann

Feldt

Amelang

. (1997).Prototypical behaviour patterns of social intelligence: An intercultural comparison between Chinese and German subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 32,329–346.

62.

K. D.

Clark

L. A

. (2003).Relations between personality traits and self‐reports of daily behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 37,231–256.