Personality,Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty

Abstract

Contributions in the public goods game—a classical social dilemma situation—have been shown to depend strongly on the presence versus absence of punishment or sanctions for free riders. Also, there appear to be noteworthy individual differences in the degree to which decision makers cooperate. Herein, we aimed to bring these two lines of research together. Firstly, we predicted that both presence of punishment and high dispositional Honesty–Humility (as conceptualized in the Honesty–Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to experience model of personality) should yield higher contributions. Secondly, and more importantly, we expected an interaction, such that only those low in Honesty–Humility would condition their behaviour on the presence versus absence of punishment, thus employing cooperation strategically. In line with the hypothesis, the results of two experiments (one of which comprised a longitudinal design) corroborated that the degree to which decision makers shift towards higher contributions when punishment is introduced depends on their dispositional level of Honesty–Humility. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

social dilemma public goods game punishment Honesty-Humility person-situation interaction HEXACO

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

, Stasser

, & Chartier

(2010). Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods: A conceptual analysis of continuous and step–level games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 385–401.

Andreoni

, & Miller

J. H.

(1993). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners‘ dilemma: Experimental evidence. The Economic Journal, 103, 570–585.

Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.

Ashton

M. C.

, & Lee

(2008). The prediction of Honesty–Humility–related criteria by the HEXACO and Five–Factor Models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.

Ashton

M. C.

, Lee

, Perugini

, Szarota

, de Vries

R. E.

, Di Blas

,… De Raad

(2004). A six–factor structure of personality–descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.

Ashton

M. C.

, Lee

, Visser

B. A.

, & Pozzebon

J. A.

(2008). Phobic tendency within the five–factor and HEXACO models of personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 734–746.

Balliet

, Parks

, & Joireman

(2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta–analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533–547.

Birnbaum

M. H.

(2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832.

Bohm

(1972). Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment. European Economic Review, 3, 111–130.

10.

Boone

, De Brabander

, & van Witteloostuijn

(1999). The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 343–377.

11.

Brandstätter

, & Güth

(2002). Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 10, 191–215.

12.

Chaudhuri

(2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14, 47–83.

13.

Chuah

S. C.

, Drasgow

, & Roberts

B. W.

(2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359–376.

14.

Colman

A. M.

(2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 139–198.

15.

Cooper

, de Jong

D. V.

, Forsythe

, & Ross

T. W.

(1996). Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from prisoner's dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12, 187–218.

16.

Cronk

B. C.

, & West

J. L.

(2002). Personality research on the Internet: A comparison of web–based and traditional instruments in take–home and in–class settings. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 177–180.

17.

Croson

, & Marks

(1998). Identifiability of individual contributions in a threshold public goods experiment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42, 167–190.

18.

Dawes

R. M.

(1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

19.

Faul

, Erdfelder

, Lang

A.–G.

, & Buchner

(2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

20.

Fehr

, & Gächter

(2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90, 980–994.

21.

Fehr

, & Gächter

(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.

22.

Fischbacher

, Gächter

, & Fehr

(2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404.

23.

Funder

D. C.

(2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.

24.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.

25.

Glover

, & Dixon

(2004). Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 791–806.

26.

Haselhuhn

M. P.

, & Mellers

B. A.

(2005). Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 24–33.

27.

Hedeker

, & Gibbons

R. D.

(2006). Longitudinal data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.

28.

Hilbig

B. E.

(2008). Individual differences in fast–and–frugal decision making: Neuroticism and the recognition heuristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1641–1645.

29.

Hilbig

B. E.

, & Zettler

(2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty–Humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 516–519.

30.

Hirsh

J. B.

, & Peterson

J. B.

(2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner's dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 254–256.

31.

Hoffman

, McCabe

, Shachat

, & Smith

(1994). Preference, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380.

32.

Hsu

L.–C.

(2008). Fairness and bargaining power in threshold public goods experiments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 151–167.

33.

John

O. P.

, & Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

, & John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

34.

Judd

C. M.

, Kenny

D. A.

, & McClelland

G. H.

(2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within–subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134.

35.

Kelley

(2007). Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: Theory, application, and implementation. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1–24.

36.

Kocher

M. G.

, Cherry

, Kroll

, Netzer

R. J.

, & Sutter

(2008). Conditional cooperation on three continents. Economics Letters, 101, 175–178.

37.

Kollock

(1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

38.

Koole

S. L.

, Jager

, van den Berg

A. E.

, Vlek

C. A. J.

, & Hofstee

W. K. B.

(2001). On the social nature of personality: Effects of extraversion, agreeableness, and feedback about collective resource use on cooperation in a resource dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 289–301.

39.

Krueger

J. I.

(2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1–35.

40.

Krueger

J. I.

(2009). A componential model of situation effects, person effects, and situation–by–person interaction effects on social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 127–136.

41.

Krueger

J. I.

, & Acevedo

(2007). Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner's dilemma: Outcome bias and evidential reasoning. The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 593–618.

42.

Kurzban

, & Houser

(2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15, S37–S52.

43.

Kurzban

, McCabe

, Smith

V. L.

, & Wilson

B. J.

(2001). Incremental commitment and reciprocity in a real–time public goods game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1662–1673.

44.

Lee

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.

45.

Lee

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2006). Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form. Psychological Assessment, 18, 182–191.

46.

Lee

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053.

47.

Lee

, Ashton

M. C.

, Morrison

D. L.

, Cordery

, & Dunlop

P. D.

(2008). Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self– and observer reports. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 147–167.

48.

Lee

, Ogunfowora

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2005). Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? Journal of Personality, 73, 1437–1463.

49.

Maner

J. K.

, Richey

, Cromer

, Mallott

, Lejuez

C. W.

, Joiner

T. E.

,… Schmidt

N. B.

(2007). Dispositional anxiety and risk–avoidant decision–making. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 665–675.

50.

Marcus

, Lee

, & Ashton

M. C.

(2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34.

51.

McCrae

R. R.

, & Costa

P. T.

(1987). Validation of the five–factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

52.

McCrae

R. R.

, & John

O. P.

(1992). An introduction to the five–factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

53.

Milgram

, & Tenne

(2000). Personality correlates of decisional task avoidant procrastination. European Journal of Personality, 14, 141–156.

54.

Moshagen

, Hilbig

B. E.

, & Musch

(2011). Defection in the dark? A randomized–response investigation of cooperativeness in social dilemma games. European Journal of Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.793

55.

Nikiforakis

, & Normann

H.–T.

(2008). A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public–good experiments. Experimental Economics, 11, 358–369.

56.

Perugini

, & De Raad

(2001). Editorial: Personality and economic behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 15, S1–S4.

57.

Rapoport

, & Suleiman

(1993). Incremental contribution in step–level public goods games with asymmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 171–194.

58.

Reips

U.–D.

(2002a). Internet–based psychological experimenting: Five dos and five don'ts. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 241–249.

59.

Reips

U.–D.

(2002b). Standards for Internet–based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256.

60.

Sabater–Grande

, & Georgantzis

(2002). Accounting for risk aversion in repeated prisoners‘ dilemma games: An experimental test. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 37–50.

61.

Sally

(1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas. A meta–analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58–92.

62.

Sefton

, Shupp

, & Walker

J. M.

(2007). The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry, 45, 671–690.

63.

Small

D. A.

, & Loewenstein

(2005). The devil you know: The effects of identifiability on punishment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 311–318.

64.

Steiger

J. H.

(2004). Beyond the F Test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 164–182.

65.

Suleiman

(1996). Expectations and fairness in a modified ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 531–554.

66.

Van Dijk

, De Cremer

, & Handgraaf

M. J. J.

(2004). Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 697–707.

67.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.

68.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

, De Bruin

E. M. N.

, Otten

, & Joireman

J. A.

(1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.

69.

Volk

, Thöni

, & Ruigrok

(2011). Personality, personal values and cooperation preferences in public goods games: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 810–815.

70.

Wagenmakers

E.–J.

(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.

71.

Weber

J. M.

, Kopelman

, & Messick

D. M.

(2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281–307.

72.

Webster

G. D.

(2009). The person–situation interaction is increasingly outpacing the person–situation debate in the scientific literature: A 30–year analysis of publication trends, 1978–2007. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 278–279.

73.

Zelmer

(2003). Linear public goods experiments: A meta–analysis. Experimental Economics, 6, 299–310.

74.

Zettler

, & Hilbig

B. E.

(2010a). Attitudes of the selfless: Explaining political orientation with altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 338–342.

75.

Zettler

, & Hilbig

B. E.

(2010b). Honesty–Humility and a person–situation interaction at work. European Journal of Personality, 24, 569–582.

76.

Zettler

, Hilbig

B. E.

, & Haubrich

(2011). Altruism at the ballots: Predicting political attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 130–133.

Personality,Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References