Dynamic Capabilities in Complex Projects: The Case of London Heathrow Terminal 5

Abstract

Whereas existing approaches and empirical studies of dynamic capabilities focus on the strategic innovation activities of firms (i.e., permanent organizations executing multiple projects and programs), this article identifies how certain types of dynamic capabilities are required to deliver large, complex, and risky projects involving multiple parties. Our longitudinal study of the design and construction of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 by the British Airports Authority (BAA) makes three main contributions to the literature: (1) It contributes to the project management literature by identifying how specific dynamic capabilities (BAA's “T5 Agreement,” strategic behaviors, and collaborative processes) are developed through a three-phase process (learning, codifying, and mobilizing) to support the strategic management of complex projects. (2) While emphasizing their importance for the successful management of complex projects, our findings also underline the continuing fragility of dynamic capabilities. (3) The case study reveals their fluidity and balancing role with respect to demands for stability and change in complex, uncertain, and volatile project environments.

Keywords

dynamic capabilities complex projects risk and uncertainty owner operator

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

P. S.

, Goldoftas

, & Levine

D. I.

(1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68.

Alvesson

, & Sandberg

(2013). Constructing research questions. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Baccarini

(1996). The concept of project complexity: A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.

Bakker

R. M.

(2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational forms: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 466–486.

Barney

J. B.

(1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Brady

, & Davies

(2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.

Brady

, & Davies

(2010). From hero to hubris: Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow's Terminal 5. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 151–157.

Brady

, & Davies

(2014). Managing structural and dynamic complexity: A tale of two projects. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 21–38.

Brady

, Davies

, & Nightingale

(2012). Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: Revisiting Klein and Meckling, special issue: Classics of project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 661–679.

10.

British Airports Authority (BAA). (1999). The T5 agreement: Delivery team handbook. BAA Company Document.

11.

Cattani

, Ferriani

, Frederiksen

, & Täube

(2011). Project-based organizing and strategic management: A long-term research agenda on temporary organizational forms. Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 3–26.

12.

Collis

D. J.

(1994). Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143–152.

13.

Coriat

(2000). The “abominable Ohno production system.” Competences, monitoring, and routines in Japanese production systems. In Dosi

, Nelson

R. R.

, & Winter

S. G.

(Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 213–240). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

14.

Danneels

(2008). Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 519–543.

15.

Danneels

(2010). Trying to become a different type of company: Dynamic capability at Smith Corona. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1–31.

16.

Davies

, & Brady

(2000). Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy, 29, 931–953.

17.

Davies

, & Brady

(2016). Explicating the dynamics of project capabilities. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 314–327.

18.

Davies

, Gann

, & Douglas

(2009). Innovation in megaprojects: Systems integration at Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review, 51(2), 101–125.

19.

Davies

, & Hobday

(2005). The business of projects: Managing innovation in complex products and systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Davies

, MacAulay

, Debarro

, & Thurston

(2014). Making innovation happen in a megaproject: The case of London's Crossrail. Project Management Journal, 45(6), 25–37.

21.

Davies

, & Mackenzie

(2014). Project complexity and systems integration: Constructing the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Games. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 773–790.

22.

De Neufville

R. A.

, & Odoni

(2003). Airport systems: Planning, design, and management. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

23.

Dodgson

, Gann

, MacAulay

, & Davies

(2015). Innovation strategy in new transportation systems: The case of Crossrail. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 261–275.

24.

Doherty

(2008). Heathrow's Terminal 5: History in the making. Chichester, England: Wiley.

25.

Done

(2008, May 8). BA took “calculated risk” on Terminal 5. Financial Times.

26.

Easterby-Smith

, Lyles

M. A.

, & Peteraf

M. A.

(2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1–8.

27.

Egan

(1998). Rethinking construction: The report of the construction industry task force. Department of Environment, Transport and Regions.

28.

Egan

(2008). Preface. In Doherty

, Heathrow's Terminal 5: History in the making (pp. ix–x). Chichester, England: Wiley.

29.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

, Furr

N. R.

, & Bingham

C. B.

(2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273.

30.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

, & Martin

J. A.

(2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

31.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

, & Sull

D. N.

(2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106–116.

32.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

, & Tabrizi

B. N.

(1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84–110.

33.

Ethiraj

S. K.

, Kale

, Krishnan

M. S.

, & Singh

J. V.

(2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 25–45.

34.

Farjoun

(2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.

35.

Flyvbjerg

, Bruzelius

, & Rothengatter

(2003). Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Gann

D. M.

, & Salter

(2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29, 955–972.

37.

Gavetti

, & Levinthal

(2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 113–137.

38.

Geraldi

, Maylor

, & Williams

(2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(9), 966–990.

39.

Gil

(2009). Developing cooperative project-client relationships: How much to expect from relational contracts. California Management Review, 51(2), 144–169.

40.

Gil

, Miozzo

, & Massini

(2012). The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow Airport's T5 project. Research Policy, 41, 415–428.

41.

Gil

, & Tether

(2010). Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity. Research Policy, 40(3), 452–466.

42.

Gioia

D. A.

, Corley

K. G.

, & Hamilton

A. L.

(2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 16–31.

43.

Helfat

C. E.

(2000). Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 955–959.

44.

Helfat

C. E.

, & Peteraf

M. A.

(2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997–1010.

45.

Helfat

C. E.

, & Winter

S. G.

(2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for a (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1243–1250.

46.

Hirschman

A. O.

(1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

47.

House of Commons Transport Committee. (2008, November 3). The opening of Heathrow Terminal 5. Twelfth Report of Session 2007–2008.

48.

Jones

, & Lichtenstein

(2008). Temporary inter-organizational projects: How temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In Cropper

, Ebers

, Huxman

, & Smith Ring

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 231–255). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

49.

Keegan

, & Turner

J. R.

(2002). The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Rang Planning, 35(4), 367–388.

50.

Knott

A. M.

(2001). The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Science, 47(3), 430–448.

51.

Langley

(1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

52.

Lenfle

(2008). Exploration and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 469–478.

53.

Lenfle

, & Loch

(2010). Lost roots: How project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty. California Management Review, 53(1), 32–55.

54.

Leonard-Barton

(1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.

55.

Loch

C. H.

, De Meyer

, & Pich

M. T.

(2006). Managing the unknown: A new approach to managing high uncertainty and risk in projects. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

56.

March

J. G.

(1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

57.

Matthews

(2008). Creating Heathrow's new eye in the sky. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers–Civil Engineering, 161(5), 66–76.

58.

Miller

(1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 116–138.

59.

Miller

, & Lessard

D. R.

(Eds.). (2000). The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

60.

Morris

P. W. G.

(2013). Reconstructing project management. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

61.

Narayanan

V. K.

, Colwell

, & Douglas

F. L.

(2009). Building organizational and scientific platforms in the pharmaceutical industry: A process perspective on the development of dynamic capabilities. British Journal of Management, 20, 25–40.

62.

National Audit Office. (2005). Case studies: Improving public services through better construction. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 364-11 Session 2004–2005. London, England: Author.

63.

Nelson

R. N.

, & Winter

S. G.

(1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

64.

O'Reilly

C. A.

, & Tushman

M. L.

(2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 74–83.

65.

O'Reilly

C. A.

, & Tushman

M. L.

(2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

66.

Oliver

(2009, July 23). Steven Morgan: Keeping them keen. New Civil Engineer.

67.

Pellegrinelli

, Murray-Webster

, & Turner

(2014). Facilitating organizational ambidexterity through the complementary use of projects and programs. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 153–164.

68.

Pellegrinelli

, Partington

, & Geraldi

J. G.

(2011). Program management: An emerging opportunity for research and scholarship. In Morris

P. W. G.

, Pinto

J. K.

, & Söderlund

, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 252–272). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

69.

Penrose

(1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

70.

Peteraf

, Di Stefano

, & Verona

(2013). The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1389–1410.

71.

Pettigrew

A. M.

(1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.

72.

Pich

M. T.

, Loch

C. H.

, & De Meyer

(2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023.

73.

Pisano

G. P.

(2000). In search of dynamic capabilities. In Dosi

, Nelson

R. R.

, & Winter

S. G.

(Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 129–153). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

74.

Sapolsky

(1972). The Polaris system development: Bureaucratic and programmatic success in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

75.

Sayles

, & Chandler

M. K.

(1971). Managing large systems. New York, NY: The Free Press.

76.

Schreyögg

G. M.

, & Kliesch-Eberl

(2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 913–933.

77.

Schreyögg

G. M.

, & Sydow

(2010). Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262.

78.

Schwab

, & Miner

A. S.

(2008). Learning in hybrid-project systems: The effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1117–1149.

79.

Shamsie

, Marin

, & Miller

(2009). In with the old, in with the new: Capabilities, strategies, and performance among the Hollywood studios. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1440–1452.

80.

Shenhar

A. J.

(2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394–414.

81.

Shenhar

A. J.

, & Dvir

(2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

82.

Söderlund

, & Tell

(2009). The P-form organization and the dynamics of project competence: Project epochs in Asea/ABB, 1950–2000. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 101–112.

83.

Sommer

S. C.

, & Loch

C. H.

(2004). Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Science, 50(10), 1334–1347.

84.

Stinchcombe

A. L.

, & Heimer

(1985). Organizational theory and project management: Administering uncertainty in Norwegian offshore oil. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press.

85.

Teece

(2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: That nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

86.

Teece

(2010). Alfred Chandler and “capabilities” theories of strategy and management. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 297–316.

87.

Teece

(2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.

88.

Teece

, & Pisano

(1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.

89.

Teece

, Pisano

, & Shuen

(1997). The dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

90.

Tripsas

, & Gavetti

(2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147–1161.

91.

Turner

, Maylor

, & Swart

(2013). Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 6, 379–389.

92.

Turner

, Maylor

, Lee-Kelley

, Brady

, Kutsch

, & Carver

(2014). Ambidexterity and knowledge strategy in major projects: A framework and illustrative case study. Project Management Journal, 45(5), 44–55.

93.

Turner

S. F.

, & Rindova

(2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), 24–46.

94.

Tushman

M. L.

, & O'Reilly

C. A.

(1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1–23.

95.

Tushman

M. L.

, & O'Reilly

(1997). Winning through innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

96.

Weick

K. E.

(1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543–555.

97.

Wernerfelt

(1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

98.

Whitley

(2006). Project-based firms: New organizational form or variations on a theme? Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 77–99.

99.

Williams

T. M.

(1999). The need for new paradigms of complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269–273.

100.

Williams

, & Done

(2008, April 5). BA optimistic after that was the week that was. Financial Times.

101.

Winch

G. M.

(2014). Three domains of project organising. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 721–731.

102.

Winter

S. G.

(2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 981–996.

103.

Winter

S. G.

(2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 49(8), 1402–1406.

104.

Winter

S. G.

(2012). Capabilities: Their origins and ancestry. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 991–995.

105.

Wolstenholme

, Fugeman

, & Hammond

(2008). Heathrow Terminal 5: Delivery strategy. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Civil Engineering, 161(5), 10–15.

106.

Yin

R. K.

(2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

107.

Zollo

, & Winter

S. G.

(2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.