Capturing Complexity in how Configurations of Firm Internal Orientations Impact Corporate Social Performance Outcomes: Breaking from the Dominant Logic of Symmetric-Variable to Asymmetric-Case-Based Theory and Testing
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2016
Capturing Complexity in how Configurations of Firm Internal Orientations Impact Corporate Social Performance Outcomes: Breaking from the Dominant Logic of Symmetric-Variable to Asymmetric-Case-Based Theory and Testing
This study exemplifies how an asymmetric and case based (configurational) research approach (using fuzzy state logic and complexity theory) is useful for conceptualization and explanation of complex topics and heterogeneous outcomes. The study here analyses the recipes (condition combinations) for Internal Orientation constructs (IO: strategic intent, CSP management, strategic orientation and industrial standards) among multi-national companies (MNCs) indicating “high” levels of corporate social performance (CSP) and the “United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment” (UNPRI) ESG factor framework (Environment, Social-human rights, and Governance) – separately and as a whole. The study applies a mixed methods research design and includes comparing ESG with financial performance across a “Top-100 Sustainable Companies Index” (n = 82 of MNCs trading on the Swedish stock exchange). The study's findings support the core tenets of complexity theory; all four IO constructs affect a high E or S or G outcome but not all three outcomes in combination.
AguinisH.GlavasA.What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agendaJ. Manage3842012932–968
2.
BarnettM.L.SalomonR.M.Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performanceStrategic Manage. J.331120121304–1320
3.
BerkhoutT.RowlandsI.H.The voluntary adoption of green electricity by Ontario-based companies: the importance of organizational values and organizational contextOrgan. Environ2032007281–303
4.
BondyK.MoonJ.MattenD.An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): form and implicationsJ. Bus. Ethics11122012281–299
5.
CaldartA.A.RicartJ.E.Corporate strategy revisited: a view from complexity theoryEur. Manage. Rev11200496–104
6.
CarrollA.B.ShabanaK.M.The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practiceInt. J. Manage. Rev121201085–105
7.
ChengJ.-H.Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chainsSupply Chain Manage1342008282–295
8.
DelmasM.A.ToffelM.W.Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black boxStrategic Manage. J.291020081027–1055
9.
FissP.C.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurationsAcad. Manage. Rev32220071180–1198
10.
FissP.C.Building better casual theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational researchAcad. Manage. J.5422011393–420
11.
GadenneD.KennedyJ.McKeiverC.An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEsJ. Bus. Ethics841200945–63
12.
GrantR.M.Toward a knowledge based theory of the firmStrategic Manage. J.17Winter Special Issue1996109–122
13.
HillR.AinscoughT.ShankT.ManullangD.Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: a global perspectiveJ. Bus. Ethics702007165–174
14.
HubbardR.Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science2016SageThousand Oaks, CA
15.
IsakssonL.WoodsideA.Modelling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performanceJ. Bus. Res69920163285–3314
16.
IsakssonL.KiesslingT.HarveyM.Corporate social responsibility: why bother?Organ. Dyn431201464–72
17.
KiesslingT.IsakssonL.YasarB.Market orientation and CSR: performance implicationsJ. Bus. Ethics13712015269–284
KolkA.PinkseJ.The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosuresCorp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manage171201015–26
20.
KPMGKPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2011KPMG, 1(1)2011
21.
LeireC.MontO.The implementation of socially responsible purchasingCorp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manage171201027–39
22.
LuoX.BhattacharyaC.B.The debate over doing good: corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic riskJ. Mark732009198–213
23.
MaakT.Undivided corporate responsibility: towards a theory of corporate integrityJ. Bus. Ethics822008353–368
24.
MattinglyJ.E.Corporate social performance: a review of empirical research examining the corporation-society relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings DataBus. Soc20151–44
25.
McGuireJ.B.SundgrenA.SchneeweissT.Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performanceAcad. Manage. J.3141988854–872
26.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD.S.Creating and capturing valueJ. Manage37520111480–1495
27.
MeloT.Garrido-MorgadoA.Corporate reputation: a combination of social responsibility and industryCorp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manage191201211–31
28.
MoratisL.CochiusT.ISO 26000: The Business Guide to the New Standard on Social Responsibility2011Greenleaf Publishing LtdSheffield
29.
OrdaniniA.ParasuramanA.RuberaG.When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurationsJ. Serv. Res172014134–149
30.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF.L.RynesS.L.Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysisOrgan. Stud2432003403–441
31.
PorterM.E.KramerM.R.Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibilityHarv. Bus. Rev8412200678–92
RamchanderS.SchwebachR.G.StakingK.I.M.The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: evidence from DS400 index reconstitutionsStrategic Manage. J.3332012303–314
36.
TomáškováE.KopfováA.Influence of strategic management on market orientationEcon. Manage152010814–819
37.
UllmanA.H.Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firmsAcad. Manage. Rev101985540–557
38.
WaddockS.A.GravesS.B.The corporate social performance-financial performance linkStrategic Manage. J.1841997303–319
39.
WagnerT.LutzR.J.WeitzB.A.Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptionsJ. Mark73200977–91
40.
WallsJ.L.BerroneP.PhanP.H.Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?Strategic Manage. J.3382012885–913
41.
WangQ.DouJ.JiaS.A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factorsBus. Soc20151–3910.1177/0007650315584317Available before print
42.
WeickK.E.The Social Psychology of Organizing2nd ed.1979Addison-WesleyReading, MA
43.
WoodsideA.G.Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for a paradigm shift from symmetrical to asymmetrical data analysis and crafting theoryJ. Bus. Res662013463–472
44.
WoodsideA.G.Embrace•perform•model: complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realitiesJ. Bus. Res671220142495–2503
