This research aims to test the power of brand attribute associations and emotional consumer-brand relationship (E-CBR) as drivers of the intention to purchase brand extensions, while taking into consideration the moderating role of perceived fit. These aspects are examined in the context of luxury brands, given their expressive and hedonic nature. In more detail, using survey data from a population of Iranian consumers and covariance-based structural equation modelling (SEM), this study confirms that E-CBR has a positive impact on the intention to purchase a luxury brand's extension. The study also confirms that E-CBR mediates the relationship between brand attribute associations and the intention to purchase a luxury brand's extension. As such, this research sheds light on the synergic effects of cognitive (brand attribute associations) and emotional (E-CBR) factors in relation to extensions of luxury brands. With respect to perceived fit, the results highlight that it moderates the relationship between brand attribute associations and the intention to purchase a luxury brand's extension. These findings advance existing knowledge of how consumers see extensions of luxury brands, revealing important underlying mechanisms that tie rational and emotional aspects, shaping consumers’ intent. Accordingly, this research yields important implications in relation to the marketing tactics that could be utilised to promote the acceptance of luxury brands’ extensions, especially in growing middle-Eastern markets such as Iran.
AakerD.A. (1990). Brand extensions: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Sloan Manag. Rev., 31(4), 47–56.
2.
AakerD.A., & JoachimsthalerE. (2000). The brand relationship spectrum: tThe key to the brand architecture challenge. Calif. Manag. Rev., 42(4), 8–23.The brand relationship spectrum: the key to the brand architecture challenge
3.
AakerD.A., & KellerK.L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Mark., 54(1).
4.
AbosagI., RoperS., & HindD. (2012). Examining the relationship between brand emotion and brand extension among supporters of professional football clubs. Eur. J. Mark., 46(9), 1233–1251.
5.
AhluwaliaR. (2008). How far can a brand stretch? Understanding the role of self-construal. J. Mark. Res., 45(3), 337–350.
6.
AlbertN., & MerunkaD. (2013). The role of brand love in consumer-brand relationships. J. Consum. Mark., 30(3), 258–266.
7.
AlbertN., MerunkaD., & Valette-FlorenceP. (2013). Brand passion: aAntecedents and consequences. J. Bus. Res., 66(7), 904–909. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.009Brand passion: antecedents and consequences
8.
AlbrechtC.M., BackhausC., GurzkiH., & WoisetschlägerD.M. (2013). Drivers of brand extension success: wWhat really matters for luxury brands. Psychol. Mark., 30(8), 647–659. 10.1002/mar.20635Drivers of brand extension success: what really matters for luxury brands
9.
AlsnihR. (2006). Characteristics of web based surveys and applications in travel research. In Travel Survey methods: Quality and Future Directions (pp. 569–592). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
10.
AlvandiM., FazliS., NajafiS., (2013). Investigating the impact of self on attitudes toward luxury brands among teens in Iran.Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci.5(7), 854–865.
11.
AndersonJ.C., & GerbingD.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: aA review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull., 103(3), 411.Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach
12.
ArikanE., YilmazC., & BodurM. (2016). Expanding the boundary of brand extensions through brand relationship quality. J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 17(6), 930–944. 10.3846/16111699.2016.1220420
BaazeemT., NealeL., & BougoureU. (2009). The effect of brand extensions on parent-brand relationship quality. In Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29718
16.
BaekT.H., KimJ., & YuJ.H. (2010). The differential roles of brand credibility and brand prestige in consumer brand choice. Psychol. Mark., 27(7), 662–678. 10.1002/mar.2035010.1002/mar.20350
17.
BagozziR.P., BatraR., & AhuviaA. (2017). Brand love: development and validation of a practical scale. Mark. Lett., 28(1), 1–14. 10.1007/s11002-016-9406-1
18.
BaroneM.J., MiniardP.W., & RomeoJ.B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. J. Consum. Res., 26(4), 386–400. 10.1086/209570
19.
Baruch-RunyonA., VanZandtZ., & ElliottS.A. (2009). Forging connections: aan investigation of new students’ perspectives of their transition to the university. NACADA J., 29(1), 31–42. 10.12930/0271-9517-29.1.31Forging connections: an investigation of new students’ perspectives of their transition to the university
20.
BatraR., AhuviaA., BagozziR.P., Brand love, J. Mark.76 (2), 2012,1–16
21.
BauerH.H., HeinrichD., & MartinI. (2007). How to create high emotional consumer-brand relationships? The causalities of brand passionBauerHans H., DanielHeinrich, IsabelMartin, University of Mannheim. In Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (pp. 2189–2198).
22.
BelkR.W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. J. Consum. Res., 15(2), 139. 10.1086/209154
23.
BelkR.W., & TumbatG. (2005). The cult of Macintosh. Consum. Mark. Culture, 8(3), 205–217.
24.
BhatS., & ReddyS.K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. J. Bus. Res., 53(3), 111–122.
25.
BhattacharyaC.B., & SenS. (2003). Consumer-company identification: aa framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. J. Mark., 67(2), 76–88. 10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies
26.
BianQ., & ForsytheS. (2012). Purchase intention for luxury brands: aA cross cultural comparison. J. Bus. Res., 65(10), 1443–1451. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.010Purchase intention for luxury brands: a cross cultural comparison
27.
BlackstonM. (2000). Observations: bBuilding brand equity by managing the brand's relationships. J. Advert. Res., 40(6), 101–105. 10.2501/JAR-40-6-101-105Observations: building brand equity by managing the brand's relationships
28.
BottomleyP.A., & HoldenS.J.S. (2001). Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies. J. Mark. Res., 38(4), 494–500.
29.
BoushD.M., & LokenB. (1991). A Process-Tracing study of brand extension evaluation. J. Mark. Res., 28(1), 16. 10.2307/3172723
30.
BrewerM.B. (1991). The social self: oOn being the same and different at the same time. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 17(5), 475–482.The social self: on being the same and different at the same time
31.
BrewerM.B., & GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 71(1), 83–93. Retrieved fromhttps://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-01782-006
32.
BridgesS., KellerK.L., & SoodS. (2000). Communication strategies for brand extensions: eenhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links. J. Advert., 29(4), 1–11. 10.1080/00913367.2000.10673620Communication strategies for brand extensions: enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links10.1080/00913367.2000.10673620
33.
BroniarczykS.M., & AlbaJ.W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. J. Mark. Res., 31(2), 214. 10.2307/3152195
34.
BrownT.J., BarryT.E., DacinP.A., & GunstR.F. (2009). Spreading the word : iinvestigating antecedents of consumers ’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 33(2), 123–138. 10.1177/0092070304268417Spreading the word : investigating antecedents of consumers ’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context
35.
BrowneM.W., & CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Ed., 154, 136.
36.
CarrollB.A., & AhuviaA.C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Mark. Lett., 17(2), 79–89. 10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2
37.
ChandonP., WansinkB., & LaurentG. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. J. Mark., 64(4), 65–81.
38.
ChangP.L., & ChiengM.H. (2006). Building consumer-brand relationship: aA cross-cultural experiential view. Psychol. Mark., 23(11), 927–959. 10.1002/mar.20140Building consumer-brand relationship: a cross-cultural experiential view
39.
ChatzipanagiotouK., VeloutsouC., & ChristodoulidesG. (2016). Decoding the complexity of the consumer-based brand equity process. J. Bus. Res., 69(11), 5479–5486.
40.
ChinW.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res., 295(2), 295–336.
41.
ChitturiR., RaghunathanR., & MahajanV. (2008). Delight by design: tThe role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. J. Mark., 72(3), 48–63.Delight by design: the role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits
CzellarS. (2003). Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: aAn integrative model and research propositions. Int. J. Res. Mark., 20(1), 97–115.Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: an integrative model and research propositions
44.
DillonW.R., MaddenT.J., KirmaniA., & MukherjeeS. (2001). Understanding what's in a brand rating: aA model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. J. Mark. Res., 38(4), 415–429. 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.415.18910Understanding what's in a brand rating: a model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity
45.
DuboisB., & CzellarS. (2002). Report prestige brands or luxury brands? An exploratory inquiry on consumer perceptions. Brand Manag. Track, 10. Retrieved fromhttps://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:5816
46.
DuboisB., CzellarS., & LaurentG. (2005). Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury: eEmpirical evidence from twenty countries. Mark. Lett., 16(2), 115–128.Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury: empirical evidence from twenty countries
47.
DysonP., FarrA., & HollisN.S. (1996). Understanding, measuring, and using brand equity. J. Advert. Res., 36(6), 9–22.
48.
ElliottR., & DaviesA. (2005). Symbolic brands and authenticity of identity performance. Brand Culture, 138–152. 10.4324/9780203002445
49.
Eren-ErdogmusI., AkgunI., & ArdaE. (2018). Drivers of successful luxury fashion brand extensions: cases of complement and transfer extensions. J. Fash. Mark. Manag., 22(4), 476–493. 10.1108/JFMM-02-2018-0020
50.
EschF.R., LangnerT.L., SchmittB.H., & GeusP. (2006). Are brands forever? How brand knowledge and relationships affect current and future purchases. J. Prod. Brand Manag., 15(2), 98–105. 10.1108/10610420610658938
FedorikhinA., & ColeC.A. (2004). Mood effects on attitudes, perceived risk and choice: mmoderators and mediators. J. Consum. Psychol., 14(1—2), 2–12. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1401&2_2Mood effects on attitudes, perceived risk and choice: moderators and mediators1–22–12
54.
FedorikhinA., ParkC.W., & ThomsonM. (2008). Beyond fit and attitude: tThe effect of emotional attachment on consumer responses to brand extensions. J. Consum. Psychol., 18(4), 281–291.Beyond fit and attitude: the effect of emotional attachment on consumer responses to brand extensions
55.
FergusonG., LauK.C., & PhauI. (2016). Brand personality as a direct cause of brand extension success: dDoes self-monitoring matter? J. Consum. Mark., 33(5), 343–353. 10.1108/JCM-04-2014-0954Brand personality as a direct cause of brand extension success: does self-monitoring matter
56.
FiskeS.T., & PavelchakM.A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: dDevelopments in schema-triggered affect. In SorrentinoR.M. & HigginsE.T. (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (pp. 167–203). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: developments in schema-triggered affect
57.
ForghaniM.H., KazemiA., & RanjbarianB. (2019). Religion, peculiar beliefs and luxury cars’ consumer behavior in Iran. J. Islam. Mark. 10.1108/JIMA-06-2018-0101
58.
FornellC., & LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res., 18(1), 39–50.
59.
FournierS. (1998). Consumers and their brands: dDeveloping relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consum. Res., 24(4), 343–353. 10.1086/209515Consumers and their brands: developing relationship theory in consumer research
60.
GobēM. (2001). Emotional Branding: The New Paradigm For Connecting Brands to People. New York: Allworth Press.
61.
Gómez-SuárezM., Martínez-RuizM.P., & Martínez-CaraballoN. (2017). Consumer-brand relationships under the marketing 3.0 paradigm: aA literature review. Front. Psychol., 8(February). 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252Consumer-brand relationships under the marketing 3.0 paradigm: a literature reviewFront. Psychol. 8 (February)10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00252
62.
GrisaffeD.B., & NguyenH.P. (2011). Antecedents of emotional attachment to brands. J. Bus. Res., 64(10), 1052–1059. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.11.002
63.
GrovesR.M., & LybergL. (2010). Total survey error: pPast, present, and future. Public Opin. Q., 74(5), 849–879.Total survey error: past, present, and future
64.
HagtvedtH., & PatrickV.M. (2009). The broad embrace of luxury: hHedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility. J. Consum. Psychol., 19(4), 608–618.The broad embrace of luxury: hedonic potential as a driver of brand extendibility
65.
HairJ.F., RingleC.M., & SarstedtM. (2011). PLS-SEM: iIndeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract., 19(2), 139–152.PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet
66.
HanlonP. (2006). Primal Branding : Create Zealots For Your Brand, Your Company, and Your Future. Simon and Schuster. 10.5194/acp-11-7925-2011
67.
HemL.E., De ChernatonyL., & IversenN.M. (2003). Factors influencing successful brand extensions. J. Mark. Manag., 19(7–8), 781–806
68.
HemL.E., & IversenN.M. (2003). Transfer of brand equity in brand extensions: tThe importance of brand loyalty. In KellerP.A. & RookD.W. (Eds.), NA-Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 30, pp. 72–79). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Transfer of brand equity in brand extensions: the importance of brand loyalty
69.
HerrP.M., FarquharP.H., & FazioR.H. (1996). Impact of dominance and relatedness on brand extensions. J. Consum. Psychol., 5(2), 135–159.
70.
HillJ., & LeeH.-H. (2015). Sustainable brand extensions of fast fashion retailers. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J., 19(2), 205–222. 10.1108/JFMM-09-2012-0056
HolmesJ.G. (2000). Social relationships: tThe nature and function of relational schemas. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 30(4), 447–495.Social relationships: the nature and function of relational schemas
74.
HudsonS., RothM.S., MaddenT.J., & HudsonR. (2015). The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: aAn empirical study of music festival attendees. Tour. Manag., 47, 68–76.The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: an empirical study of music festival attendees
75.
HwangJ., & HanH. (2014). Examining strategies for maximizing and utilizing brand prestige in the luxury cruise industry. Tour. Manag., 40, 244–259.
76.
HwangJ., & HyunS.S. (2012). The antecedents and consequences of brand prestige in luxury restaurants. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res., 17(6), 656–683.
77.
HwangJ., & KandampullyJ. (2012). The role of emotional aspects in younger consumer-brand relationships. J. Prod. Brand Manag., 21(2), 98–108.
78.
IsenA.M., & DaubmanK.A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 47(6), 1206.
79.
JafariA., & SüerdemA. (2012). An analysis of material consumption culture in the Muslim world. Mark. Theory, 12(1), 61–79.
80.
JaputraA., EkinciY., & SimkinL. (2018). Tie the knot: building stronger consumers’ attachment toward a brand. J. Strateg. Mark., 26(3), 223–240. 10.1080/0965254X.2016.1195862
81.
Jung JungH., LeeY., KimH., & YangH. (2014). Impacts of country images on luxury fashion brand: fFacilitating with the brand resonance model. J. Fash. Mark. Manag., 18(2), 187–205.Impacts of country images on luxury fashion brand: facilitating with the brand resonance model
82.
KapfererJ.-N. (2008). The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term (Illustrate). Kogan Page Publishers.The New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term (Illustrate)
83.
KellerK.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J. Mark., 57(1), 1–22.
84.
KellerK.L. (2001). Building Customer-Based Brand Equity: A Blueprint For Creating Strong Brands. Marketing Science Institute.
85.
KellerK.L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. J. Mark. Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155
86.
KellerK.L. (2012). Understanding the richness of brand relationships: rResearch dialogue on brands as intentional agents. J. Consum. Psychol., 22(2), 186–190. 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.011Understanding the richness of brand relationships: research dialogue on brands as intentional agents
KempE., ChildersC.Y., & WilliamsK.H. (2012). Place branding: cCreating self-brand connections and brand advocacy. J. Prod. Brand Manag., 21(7), 508–515. 10.1108/10610421211276259Place branding: creating self-brand connections and brand advocacy
89.
KimJ.-H. (2019). Imperative challenge for luxury brands. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., 47(2), 220–244. 10.1108/IJRDM-06-2017-0128
90.
KimK., ParkJ., & KimJ. (2014). Consumer–brand relationship quality: wWhen and how it helps brand extensions. J. Bus. Res., 67(4), 591–597. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.001Consumer–brand relationship quality: when and how it helps brand extensions
91.
KumagaiK., & NagasawaS. (2017). The effect of selective store location strategy and self-congruity on consumers’ apparel brand attitudes toward luxury vs. non-luxury. J. Glob. Fash. Mark., 8(4), 266–282. 10.1080/20932685.2017.1348241
92.
LamS.K., AhearneM., MullinsR., HayatiB., & SchillewaertN. (2013). Exploring the dynamics of antecedents to consumer–brand identification with a new brand. J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 41(2), 234–252.
93.
LeeY., & O'ConnorG.C. (2003). The impact of communication strategy on launching new products: tThe moderating role of product innovativeness. J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 20(1), 4–21. 10.1111/1540-5885.t01-1-201002The impact of communication strategy on launching new products: the moderating role of product innovativeness
94.
LeventhalR.C., & PapadatosC. (2006). The art of storytelling: hHow loyalty marketers can build emotional connections to their brands. J. Consum. Mark., 23(7), 382–384.The art of storytelling: how loyalty marketers can build emotional connections to their brands
95.
LoureiroS.M.C., & KaufmannH.R. (2012). Explaining love of wine brands. J. Promot. Manag., 18(3), 329–343.
96.
LoureiroS.M.C., RuedigerK.H., & VrontisD. (2012). Brand emotional connection and loyalty. J. Brand Manag., 20(1), 13–27. 10.1057/bm.2012.3
97.
LowG.S., & LambC.W. (2000). The measurement and dimensionality of brand associations. J. Prod. Brand Manag., 9(6), 350–370. 10.1108/10610420010356966
MagnoniF., & RouxE. (2012). The impact of step-down line extension on consumer-brand relationships: aA risky strategy for luxury brands. J. Brand Manag., 19(7), 595–608.The impact of step-down line extension on consumer-brand relationships: a risky strategy for luxury brands
100.
MalhotraN.K. (1981). A scale to measure self-concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. J. Mark. Res., 18(4), 456–464. 10.1177/002224378101800407
101.
MartinI.M., & StewartD.W. (2003). The differential impact of goal congruency on attitudes, intentions, and the transfer of brand equity. J. Mark. Res., 38(4), 471–484. 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.471.18912
102.
McEwenW.J. (2005). Married to the Brand: Why Consumers Bond With Some Brands For Life - Lessons from 60 Years of Research Into the Psychology of Consumer Relationships. New York: Gallup Press. Retrieved fromhttp://books.google.com/books?id=Xzlqt1Erl0cC&pgis=1
103.
MiremadiA., FotoohiH., SadehF., TabriziF., & JavidigholipourmashhadK. (2011). The possible effects of need for uniqueness's dimensions on luxury brands: cCase of Iran and UAE. Int. J. Mark. Stud., 5(7), 854–865.The possible effects of need for uniqueness's dimensions on luxury brands: case of Iran and UAE
104.
MongaA.B., & JohnD.R. (2010). What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation. J. Mark., 74(3), 80–92.
105.
MorrisJ.D., WooC., GeasonJ.A., & KimJ. (2002). The power of affect: pPredicting intention. J. Advert. Res., 42(3), 7–17.The power of affect: predicting intention
106.
MunizA.M., & SchauH.J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community. J. Consum. Res., 31(4), 737–747.
107.
NedK. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: aA full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. E-Collab., 11(4), 1–10. 10.4018/ijec.2015100101Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach10.4018/ijec.2015100101
108.
NetemeyerR.G., KrishnanB., PulligC., WangG., YagciM., DeanD., … WirthF. (2004). Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. J. Bus. Res., 57(2), 209–224.
ParkC.W., MacInnisD.J., & PriesterJ. (2006). Brand Attachment: Constructs, Consequences, and Causes. Foundations and Trends in Marketing (Vol. 1). Hanover, MA: Now Publishers Inc. 10.1561/1700000006
112.
ParkC.W., MacInnisD.J., PriesterJ., EisingerichA.B., & IacobucciD. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: cConceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. J. Mark., 74(6), 1–17.Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers
113.
ParkC.W., MilbergS., & LawsonR. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: tThe role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. J. Consum. Res., 18(2), 185. 10.1086/209251Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency
114.
ParkJ.-W., & KimK.-H. (2001). Role of consumer relationships with a brand in brand extensions: sSome exploratory findings. In GillyM.C. & Meyers-LevyJ. (Eds.), NA-Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 28, pp. 179–185). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Role of consumer relationships with a brand in brand extensions: some exploratory findings
115.
ParkJ.-W., KimK.-H., & KimJ. (2002). Acceptance of brand extensions: iInteractive influences of product category similarity, typicality of claimed benefits, and brand relationship quality. In BroniarczykS.M. & NakamotoK. (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 29, pp. 190–198). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Acceptance of brand extensions: interactive influences of product category similarity, typicality of claimed benefits, and brand relationship quality
116.
PerdueC.W., DovidioJ.F., GurtmanM.B., & TylerR.B. (1990). Us and them: sSocial categorization and the process of intergroup bias. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol., 59(3), 475.Us and them: social categorization and the process of intergroup bias
117.
PinaJ.M., Dall'Olmo RileyF., & LomaxW. (2013). Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: aA meta-analysis approach. J. Bus. Res., 66(9), 1411–1419. 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2012.05.008Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: a meta-analysis approach
118.
PodsakoffP.M., MacKenzieS.B., LeeJ.-Y., & PodsakoffN.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: aA critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol., 88(5), 879–903.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
119.
PontesN., PalmeiraM., & JevonsC. (2017). Brand expertise and perceived consistency reversals on vertical line extensions: tThe moderating role of extension direction. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 34, 209–218. 10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2016.10.003Brand expertise and perceived consistency reversals on vertical line extensions: the moderating role of extension direction
120.
ReddyM., TerblancheN., PittL., & ParentM. (2009). How far can luxury brands travel? Avoiding the pitfalls of luxury brand extension. Bus. Horiz., 52(2), 187–197.
121.
RobertsK. (2005). Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands. New York, NY: PowerHouse Books.
SalehzadehR., & Khazaei PoolJ. (2017). Brand attitude and perceived value and purchase intention toward global luxury brands. J. Int. Consum. Mark., 29(2), 74–82. 10.1080/08961530.2016.1236311
124.
SalinasE.M., & PérezJ.M.P. (2009). Modeling the brand extensions’ influence on brand image. J. Bus. Res., 62(1), 50–60.
125.
SoJ.T., ParsonsA.G., & YapS.-F. (2013). Corporate branding, emotional attachment and brand loyalty: the case of luxury fashion branding. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J., 17(4), 403–423.
126.
SteenkampJ.B.E.M., BatraR., & AldenD.L. (2003). How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 34(1), 53–65. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400002
127.
SternbergR.J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychol. Rev., 93(2), 119–135.
128.
StewartD.W. (1981). The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. J. Mark. Res., 18(1), 51–62.
129.
Stokburger-SauerN.E., RatneshwarS., & SenS. (2012). Drivers of consumer–brand identification. Int. J. Res. Mark., 29(4), 406–418.
130.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc. Psychol. Intergroup Relat., 33(47), 33–47. 10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
131.
TakaliH., HamidiM., KhabiriM., SajjadiN., & AlhaniF. (2012). The analysis of experts’ perceived experience of the effective factors in brand equity of Iranian national Olympic Committee. World J. Sport Sci., 6(4), 441–451.
132.
TaylorS.A., & BakerT.L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers’ purchase intentions. J. Retail., 70(2), 163–178.
133.
TeimourpourB., & HanzaeeK.H. (2011). The impact of culture on luxury consumption behaviour among Iranian consumers. J. Islam. Mark., 2(3), 309–328. 10.1108/17590831111164822
134.
TeimourpourB., & HanzaeeK.H. (2014). An analysis of Muslims’ luxury market in Iran: cChallenges and opportunities. J. Islam. Mark., 5(2), 198–209. 10.1108/JIMA-01-2013-0002An analysis of Muslims’ luxury market in Iran: challenges and opportunities
135.
ThompsonC.J., RindfleischA., & ArselZ. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the Doppelgänger brand image. J. Mark., 70(1), 50–64.
136.
ThomsonM., MacInnisD.J., & ParkC.W. (2005). The ties that bind: mMeasuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. J. Consum. Psychol., 15(1), 77–91.The ties that bind: measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands
137.
TianK.T., BeardenW.O., & HunterG.L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: sScale development and validation. J. Consum. Res., 28(1), 50–66.Consumers’ need for uniqueness: scale development and validation
138.
tom DieckM.C., JungT.H., KimW.G., & MoonY. (2017). Hotel guests’ social media acceptance in luxury hotels. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., 29(1), 530–550. 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0552
139.
TsaiS. (2005). Impact of personal orientation on luxury-brand purchase value An international investigation. Int. J. Res. Mark., 22(3), 429–454. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.11.002
140.
TynanC., McKechnieS., & ChhuonC. (2010). Co-creating value for luxury brands. J. Bus. Res., 63(11), 1156–1163.
VigneronF., & JohnsonL.W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 1(1), 1–15.
143.
VigneronF., & JohnsonL.W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. J. Brand Manag., 11(6), 484–506.
144.
VlachosP.A., TheotokisA., PramatariK., & VrechopoulosA. (2010). Consumer-retailer emotional attachment: sSome antecedents and the moderating role of attachment anxiety. Eur. J. Mark., 44(9/10), 1478–1499.Consumer-retailer emotional attachment: some antecedents and the moderating role of attachment anxiety
145.
VlachosP.A., & VrechopoulosA.P. (2012). Consumer–retailer love and attachment: aAntecedents and personality moderators. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 19(2), 218–228. 10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2012.01.003Consumer–retailer love and attachment: antecedents and personality moderators10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2012.01.003
146.
VölcknerF., & SattlerH. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. J. Mark., 70(2), 18–34.
147.
VölcknerF., & SattlerH. (2007). Empirical generalizability of consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Int. J. Res. Mark., 24(2), 149–162. 10.1016/J.IJRESMAR.2006.11.003
148.
VossK.E., SpangenbergE.R., & GrohmannB. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. J. Mark. Res., 40(3), 310–320.
149.
WangC.-Y., WuL.-W., LinC.-Y., & ChenR.-J. (2017). Purchase intention toward the extension and parent brand: tthe role of brand commitment. J. Econ. Manag., 13(1), 83–103. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jem.org.tw/content/pdf/Vol.13No.1/04.pdfPurchase intention toward the extension and parent brand: the role of brand commitmentRetrieved fromhttp://www.jem.org.tw/content/pdf/Vol.13No.1/04.pdf
150.
WiedmannK.-P., HennigsN., & SiebelsA. (2007). Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: aA cross-cultural framework. Acad. Mark. Sci. Rev., 2007(7).Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: a cross-cultural framework
151.
WolfE.J., HarringtonK.M., ClarkS.L., & MillerM.W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: aAn evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 73(6), 913–934.Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety
