Is HUGO still the BOSS? Investigating the reciprocal effects of brand extensions on brand personality of luxury brands

Abstract

This research aims to empirically investigate positive and negative reciprocal effects of extensions on brand personality by varying levels of congruency and typicality, while controlling for the effects of motivation processing. A 2 (incongruent, congruent) × 2 (high typicality, low typicality) × 2 (high motivation, low motivation) research design was employed using two extension categories, namely watches and kidswear of the HUGO BOSS brand. The findings revealed brand personality dilution effects only. Specifically, brand personality dilution occurred in response to incongruent and congruent information. Further, contrary to schema theory, brand personality evaluations neither strictly followed the bookkeeping model in high-motivation conditions nor the subtyping model in low-motivation conditions in response to in-congruent information.

Keywords

Brand personality Brand extension Brand personality dilution Luxury brand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaker

D. A.

(1990). Brand extensions: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Sloan Manag. Rev. 31(4), 47–56.

Aaker

D. A.

Keller

K. L.

(1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Market. 54(1), 27–41.

Aaker

J. L.

(1995). Brand personality: conceptualization, Measurement and Underlying Psychological Mechanisms. UMI Dissertation Services, Stanford University.

Aaker

J. L.

(1997). Dimensions of brand personality. J. Mark. Res. 34(3), 347–356.

Ahluwalia

Gürhan-Canli

(2000). The effects of extensions on the family brand name: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consum. Res. 27(3), 371–381.

Ahn

Park

J. K.

Hyun

(2018). Luxury product to service brand extension and brand equity transfer. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 42, 22–28.

Albrecht

C. M.

Backhaus

Gurzki

Woisetschlager

D. M.

, (2013). Drivers of brand extension success: What really matters for luxury brands. Psychol. Market. 30(8), 647–659.

Arora

A. S.

McIntyre

J. R.

Arora

(2015). Consumer response to diffusion brands and luxury brands: The role of country of origin and country of manufacture. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 27(1), 3–26.

Azoulay

Kapferer

J. N.

(2003). Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? J. Brand Manag. 11(2), 143–155.

10.

Bhat

Reddy

S. K.

(2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. J. Bus. Res. 53(3), 111–122.

11.

Boush

D. M.

Loken

(1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. J. Mark. Res. 28(1), 16–28.

12.

Bridges

Keller

K. L.

Sood

(2000). Communication strategies for brand extensions: Enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links. J. Advert. 29(4), 1–11.

13.

Butcher

Phau

Shimul

A. S.

(2017). Uniqueness and status consumption in generation y consumers: Does moderation exist? Market. Intell. Plan. 35(5), 673–687.

14.

Camurdan

Gurhan-Canli

Monga

A. B.

(2015). When strong self-brand connections don’t protect brands: Achievement mindsets and brand dilution. NA-Adv. Consum. Res. Vol. 43.

15.

Carter

R. E.

Curry

D. J.

(2013). Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: New evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 41(2), 253–269.

16.

Dwivedi

Merrilees

(2013). Brand extension feedback effects: Towards a mediated framework. J. Consum. Mark. 30(5), 450–461.

17.

Eagly

A. H.

Chaiken

(1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jo-vanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX.

18.

Eastman

J. K.

Goldsmith

R. E.

Flynn

L. R.

(1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 7(3), 41–52.

19.

Ferguson

Lau

K. C.

Phau

(2016). Brand personality as a direct cause of brand extension success: Does self-monitoring matter? J. Consum. Mark. 33(5), 343–353.

20.

Ferraro

Kirmani

Matherly

(2013). Look at me! Look at me! Conspicuous brand usage, self-brand connection, and dilution. J. Mark. Res. 50(4), 477–488.

21.

Fiske

S. T.

(1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. Affect and Cognition: 17th Annual Carnegie Mellon symposium on Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 55–78.

22.

Fiske

S. T.

Pavelchak

M. A.

(1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In: Sorrentino

R. M.

Hig-gins

E. T.

(Eds.), The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior. Guilford Press, New York, pp. 167–203.

23.

Flynn

L. R.

Goldsmith

R. E.

Pollitte

(2016). Materialism, status consumption, and market involved consumers. Psychol. Market. 33(9), 761–776.

24.

Fournier

, (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 343–373.

25.

Gabrielli

Baghi

(2016). Brand architecture shift and corporate brand equity: An exploratory study. Market. Intell. Plan. 34(6), 777–794.

26.

Goldsmith

R. E.

Hofacker

C. F.

(1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 19(3), 209–221.

27.

Govers

P. C.

Schoormans

J. P.

(2005). Product personality and its influence on consumer preference. J. Consum. Mark. 22(4), 189–197.

28.

Gürhan-Canli

Maheswaran

(1998). The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement. J. Mark. Res. 35(4), 464–473.

29.

Han

Y. J.

Nunes

J. C.

Dreze

(2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. J Mark 74(4), 15–30.

30.

Jain

S. P.

Maheswaran

(2000). Motivated reasoning: A depth-of-processing perspective. J. Consum. Res. 26(4), 358–371.

31.

Johnston

Hewstone

(1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change: 3. Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming group members. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 28(4), 360–386.

32.

Kapferer

J. N.

(1997). Managing luxury brands. J. Brand Manag. 4(4), 251–259.

33.

Kapferer

J. N.

(2015). Kapferer On luxury: How luxury Brands Can Grow Yet Remain Rare. Kogan Page Publishers, London, UK.

34.

Katz

, (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opin Q 24(2), 163–204.

35.

Keller

K. L.

Aaker

D. A.

(1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. J. Mark. Res. 29(1), 35–50.

36.

Kim

Park

Kim

(2014). Consumer-brand relationship quality: When and how it helps brand extensions. J. Bus. Res. 67(4), 591–597.

37.

Costello

J. P.

Taylor

C. R.

(2017). What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature. J. Bus. Res. 99, 405–413.

38.

Kumar

, (2005). Brand counterextensions: The impact of brand extension success versus failure. J. Mark. Res. 42(2), 183–194.

39.

Lane

V. R.

(2000). The impact of ad repetition and ad content on consumer perceptions of incongruent extensions. J. Mark. 64(2), 80–91.

40.

Martinez

Pina

J. M.

(2003). The negative impact of brand extensions on parent brand image. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 12(7), 432–448.

41.

Matthiesen

Phau

(2005). The ‘HUGO BOSS’ connection: achieving global brand consistency across countries. J. Brand Manag. 12 (5), 325–338.

42.

Matthiesen

Phau

(2010). Brand image inconsistencies of luxury fashion brands: A buyer-seller exchange situation model of HUGO BOSS Australia. J. Fashion Mark. Manag. Int. J. 14(2), 202–218.

43.

Michel

Donthu

(2014). Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations. J. Bus. Res. 67(12), 2611–2619.

44.

Molinillo

Japutra

Nguyen

Chen

C. H. S.

(2017). Responsible brands vs. active brands? An examination of brand personality on brand awareness, brand trust, and brand loyalty. Mark. Intell. Plan. 35(2).

45.

Moon

Sprott

D. E.

(2016). Ingredient branding for a luxury brand: The role of brand and product fit. J. Bus. Res.

46.

Nueno

J. L.

Quelch

J. A.

(1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Bus Horiz 41(6), 61–68.

47.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Goldman

(1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41(5), 847–855.

48.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

Schumann

(1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consum. Res. 10(2), 135–146.

49.

Phau

Prendergast

(2000). Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the ‘rarity principle’. J. Brand Manag. 8(2), 122–138.

50.

Reddy

Terblanche

Pitt

Parent

(2009). How far can luxury brands travel? Avoiding the pitfalls of luxury brand extension. Bus Horiz. 52(2), 187–197.

51.

Riley

F. D. O.

Lomax

Blunden

(2004). Dove vs. Dior: Extending the brand extension decision-making process from mass to luxury. Austr. Mark. J. (AMJ) 12(3), 40–55.

52.

Roulet

, (2019). “Normal” growth forecast for the luxury market in 2019. FHH J. https://journal.hautehorlogerie.org/en/normal-growth-forecast-for-the-luxury-market-in-2019/.

53.

Shimul

A. S.

Phau

(2018). Consumer advocacy for luxury brands. Austr. Mark. J. (AMJ) 26(3), 264–271.

54.

Shimul

A. S.

Phau

Lwin

(2019). Conceptualising luxury brand attachment: scale development and validation. J. Brand Manag. 26(6), 675–690.

55.

Sirgy

M. J.

(1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consum. Res. 9(3), 287–300.

56.

Sivakumar

, (2015). Modeling the effect of brand proliferation on category expansion and cannibalization. Marketing Dynamism & Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same. Springer International Publishing 739.

57.

Sood

Keller

K. L.

(2012). The effects of brand name structure on brand extension evaluations and parent brand dilution. J. Mark. Res. 49(3), 373–382.

58.

Stathopoulou

Balabanis

(2019). The effect of cultural value orientation on consumers’ perceptions of luxury value and proclivity for luxury consumption. J. Bus. Res. 102, 298–312.

59.

Stumpf

Baum

(2016). Customer referral reward-brand-fit: a schema congruity perspective. Psychol. Mark. 33(7), 542–558.

60.

Sujan

Bettman

J. R.

(1989). The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers’ brand and category perceptions: some insights from schema research. J. Mark. Res. 26(4), 454–467.

61.

Swaminathan

Page

K. L.

Gurhan-Canli

(2007). My” brand or “our” brand: the effects of brand relationship dimensions and self-construal on brand evaluations. J. Consum. Res. 34(2), 248–259.

62.

Tauber

E. M.

(1988). Brand leverage-strategy for growth in a cost-control world. J. Advert. Res. 28(4), 26–30.

63.

Vigneron

Johnson

L. W.

(1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Acad. Market. Sci. Rev. 1, 1999.

64.

Weber

Crocker

(1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45(5), 961–977.

65.

Zhang

Sood

(2002). “Deep” and “surface” cues: Brand extension evaluations by children and adults. J. Consum. Res. 29(1), 129–141

66.

Zhu

Teng

Foti

Yuan

(2019). Using self-congruence theory to explain the interaction effects of brand type and celebrity type on consumer attitude formation. J. Bus. Res. 103, 301–309.

67.

Zikmund

W. G.

(2003). Exploring Marketing Research, 8 ed Thomson South-Western, Ohio.