Consumers assess the credibility of online product reviews to guide their purchase decisions. However, little is known about how consumers determine the credibility of online product reviews. This article examines the effect of the level of detail in a product review and the level of reviewer agreement with it on the credibility of a review and consumers’ purchase intentions for search and experience products. Overall, the results indicate that more credible reviews lead to higher purchase intentions. Interestingly, the findings also demonstrate that consumers determine the credibility of a review differently for search and experience products. For search products, consumers deem online reviews to be more credible when the reviews contain detailed information about the product. However, for experience products, consumers determine the credibility of a review by assessing the level of reviewer agreement with a review. The lack of diagnosticity of detailed information in online reviews of experience products is attributed to the idiosyncratic nature of experiences. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
AakerJenniferThe Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes: Diagnosticity or Accessibility?Journal of Consumer Research2642000340–357
2.
AakerJennifer L.MaheswaranDurairajThe Effect of Cultural Orientation on PersuasionJournal of Consumer Research2431997315–328
3.
AndrewsJ. CraigBurtonScotNetemeyerRichard G.Are Some Comparative Nutrition Claims Misleading? The Role of Nutrition Knowledge, Ad Claim Type and Disclosure ConditionsJournal of Advertising293200029–42
4.
ArndtJohanWord of Mouth Advertising: A Review of the Literature1967Advertising Research FoundationNew York
5.
ArndtJohanRole of Product-related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New ProductJournal of Marketing Research431967291–295
6.
BansalHarvir S.VoyerPeter A.Word-of-Mouth Processes Within a Services Purchase Decision ContextJournal of Service Research322000166–177
7.
BenedicktusRay L.BradyMichael K.DarkePeter R.VoorheesClay M.Conveying Trustworthiness to Online Consumers: Reactions to Consensus, Physical Store Presence, Brand Familiarity, and Generalized SuspicionJournal of Retailing8642010322–335
8.
BenedicktusRay L.The Effects of 3rd Party Consensus Information on Service Expectations and Online TrustJournal of Business Research6482011846–853
9.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDinaThe Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book ReviewsJournal of Marketing Research4332006345–4354
10.
ClemonsEric K.GaoGuodong “Gordon”HittLorin M.When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation: A Study of the Craft Beer IndustryJournal of Management Information Systems2322006149–171
11.
CummingGeoffFidlerFionaVauxDavid L.Error Bars in Experimental BiologyThe Journal of Cell Biology177120077–11
12.
DellorcasChrysanthosZhangXiaoquan (Michael)AwadNaveen F.Exploring the Value of Online Product Reviews in Forecasting Sales: The Case of Motion PicturesJournal of Interactive Marketing214200723–45
13.
DholakiaRuby RoySternthalBrianHighly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities?Journal of Consumer Research341977223–232
14.
DiLallaDavid L.DollingerStephen J.Cleaning Up Data and Running Preliminary AnalysesLeongF.T.L.AustinL.T.The Psychology Research Handbook2006SageThousand Oaks, CA241–253
15.
Federal Trade CommissionFirm to Pay FTC $250,000 to Settle Charges that IT Used Misleading Online “Consumer” and “Independent” Reviewsavailable athttp://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/03/legacy.shtm2011
16.
FeldmanJack M.LynchJohn G.Jr.Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and BehaviorJournal of Applied Psychology7331988421–435
17.
FormanChrisGhoseAnindyaWiesenfeldBatiaExamining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic MarketsInformation Systems Research1932008291–313
18.
FrankeGeorge R.HuhmannBruce A.MothersbaughDavid L.Information Content and Consumer Readership of Print Ads: A Comparison of Search and Experience ProductsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science321200420–31
GillyMary C.GrahamJohn L.WolfinbargerMary FinleyLeeLaura J.A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information SearchJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science262199883–100
22.
GodesDavidMayzlinDinaUsing Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth CommunicationMarketing Science2342004545–560
23.
GoldsmithR.E.Electronic Word-of-MouthKhosrow-PourMehdiEncyclopedia of E-commerce, E-government and Mobile Marketing2006Idea Group PublishingHershey, PA408–412
HerrPaul M.KardesFrank R.KimJohnEffects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-diagnosticity PerspectiveJournal of Consumer Research1741991454–462
26.
KellerEdUnleashing the Power of Word of Mouth: Creating Brand Advocacy to Drive GrowthJournal of Advertising Research4742007, December 448–452
27.
LynchJohn G.Jr.MarmorsteinHowardWeigoldMichael F.Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recall Attributes and Prior Overall EvaluationsJournal of Consumer Research1521988169–184
28.
MarksGaryMillerNormanTen Years of Research in the False-Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical ReviewPsychological Bulletin1021198772–90
29.
MitraKaushikReissMichelle C.CapellaLouis M.An Examination of Perceived Risk, Information Search and Behavioral Intentions in Search, Experience, and Credence ServicesJournal of Services Marketing1331999208–228
30.
NelsonPhillipInformation and Consumer BehaviorJournal of Political Economy7821970311–329
31.
NeslinScott A.NovakThomas P.BakerKenneth R.HoffmanDonna L.An Optimal Contact Model for Maximizing Online Panel Response RatesManagement Science5552009727–737
32.
NunnallyJumBernsteinIraPsychometric TheoryThird edition1994McGraw-HillNew York
33.
PanYueZhangJason Q.Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-generated Product ReviewsJournal of Retailing8742011598–612
34.
ParkDo-HyungKimSaraThe Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word-of Mouth Via Online Consumer ReviewsElectronic Commerce Research and Applications742008399–410
35.
PornpitakpanChanthikaThe Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades’ EvidenceJournal of Applied Social Psychology3422004243–281
36.
PreacherKristopher J.HayesAndrew F.SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation ModelsBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers3642004717–731
37.
SchlosserAnn E.Can Including Pros and Cons Increase the Helpfulness and Persuasiveness of Online Reviews? The Interactive Effects of Ratings and ArgumentsJournal of Consumer Psychology2132011226–239
38.
SenShahanaLermanDawnWhy Are You Telling Me This? An Examination Into Negative Consumer Reviews on the WebJournal of Interactive Marketing214200776–94
39.
SternthalBrianPhillpsLynn W.DholakiaRubyThe Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly4231978285–314
40.
SunMonicHow Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter?Management Science5842012696–707
41.
TrusovMichaelBucklinRandolph E.PauwelsKoenEffects of Word-of-Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking SiteJournal of Marketing735200990–102
42.
YiYougaeCognitive and Affective Priming Effects of the Context for Print AdvertisementsJournal of Advertising192199040–48
43.
ZhaoXinshuLynchJohn G.Jr.ChenQimeiReconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation AnalysisJournal of Consumer Research3722010197–206
44.
ZhuFengZhangXiaoquan (Michael)Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer CharacteristicsJournal of Marketing7422010133–148
