An evolutionary lens can inform the study of cultural forms in a myriad of ways. These can be construed as adaptations, as exaptations (evolutionary byproducts), as gene–culture interactions, as memes, or as fossils of the human mind. Products of popular culture (e.g., song lyrics, movie themes, romance novels) are to evolutionary cultural theorists what fossils and skeletal remains represent to paleontologists. Although human minds do not fossilize or skeletonize (the cranium does), the cultural products created by human minds do. By identifying universally recurring themes for a given cultural form (song lyrics and collective wisdoms in the current article), spanning a wide range of cultures and time periods, one is able to test key tenets of evolutionary psychology. In addition to using evolutionary psychology to understand the contents of popular culture, the discipline can itself be studied as a contributor to popular culture. Beginning with the sociobiology debates in the 1970s, evolutionary informed analyses of human behavior have engendered great fascination and animus among the public at large. Following a brief summary of studies that have explored the diffusion of the evolutionary behavioral sciences within specific communities (e.g., the British media), I offer a case analysis of the penetration of evolutionary psychology within the blogosphere, specifically the blog community hosted by Psychology Today.
AlexanderG. M. (2003). An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue, and the brain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 7–14. doi:10.1023/A:1021833110722
2.
AlexanderG. M., & HinesM. (2002). Sex differences in response to children's toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00107-1
3.
AndrewsP. W., GangestadS. W., & MatthewsD. (2002). Adaptationism—How to carry an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–553. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000092
4.
AungerR. (2002). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. New York, NY: The Free Press.
5.
AungerR.. (2000). Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BarkowJ. H. (2006). Sometimes the bus does wait. In BarkowJ. H., Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists (pp. 3–59). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
Beja-PereiraA., LuikartG., EnglandP. R., BradleyD. G., JannO. C., BertorelleG., … ErhardtG. (2003). Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nature Genetics, 35, 311–313. doi:10.1038/ng1263
8.
BenyusJ. M. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
9.
BereczkeiT. (1993). An intellectual legacy of the past: The reception of sociobiology in the East-European countries. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 399–407. doi:10.1007/BF00857686
10.
BetzigL. (2005). Politics as sex: The Old Testament case. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 326–346.
11.
BlackmoreS. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12.
BouJaoudeS., WilesJ. R., AsgharA., & AltersB. (2011). Muslim Egyptian and Lebanese students' conceptions of biological evolution. Science & Education, 20, 895–915.
13.
BoydB., CarrollJ., & GottschallJ. (2010). Evolution, literature, and film: A reader. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14.
BoydB. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15.
BoydR., & RichersonP. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
BoyerP., & BergstromB. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 111–130. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085201
17.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
BrownW. M., CronkL., GrochowK., JacobsonA., LiuC. K., PopovicZ., & TriversR. (2005). Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men. Nature, 438, 1148–1150. doi:10.1038/nature04344
19.
BullerD. J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
BunzeckN., & DüzelE. (2006). Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron, 51, 369–379. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.021
21.
BussD. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22.
CamposL. D. S., OttaE., & SiqueiraJ. D. O. (2002). Sex differences in mate selection strategies: Content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 395–406. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00099-5
23.
CassidyA. (2005). Popular evolutionary psychology in the UK: An unusual case of science in the media?Public Understanding of Science, 14, 115–141. doi:10.1177/0963662505050792
24.
CassidyA. (2006). Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 175–205. doi:10.1177/0963662506059260
25.
CassidyA. (2007). The (sexual) politics of evolution: Popular controversy in the late 20th-century United Kingdom. History of Psychology, 10, 199–226. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.199
26.
ChiaoJ. Y., & BlizinskyK. D. (2010). Culture-gene coevolution of individualism- collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 529–537. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1650
27.
CoxA., & FisherM. (2009). The Texas billionaire's pregnant bride: An evolutionary interpretation of romance fiction titles. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 386–401.
28.
CzikoG. (1995). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
DaggA. I. (2004). “Love of shopping” is not a gene: Problems with Darwinian psychology. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books.
30.
DarwinF.. (1887). The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. London, England: John Murray.
31.
DavisH., & McLeodS. L. (2003). Why humans value sensational news: An evolutionary perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 208–216. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00012-6
32.
DawkinsR. (1976). The selfish gene. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
De BackerC. J. S., NelissenM., VynckeP., BraeckmanJ., & McAndrewF. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to friends. A test of two hypotheses on the adaptiveness of celebrity gossip. Human Nature, 18, 334–354. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9023-z
34.
DobzhanskyT. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35, 125–129.
35.
DukesR. L., BiselT. M., BoregaK. N., LobatoE. A., & OwensM. D. (2003). Expressions of love, sex, and hurt in popular songs: A content analysis of all-time greatest hits. Social Science Journal, 40, 643–650. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00075-2
36.
DurhamW. H. (1991). Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
DuttonD. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
38.
EulerH. A., & VolandE. (2001). The reception of sociobiology in Germany psychology and anthropology. In PetersonS. A. & SomitA., Evolutionary approaches in the behavioral sciences: Toward a better understanding of human nature (pp. 277–286). Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier/JAI.
39.
FrancisR. C. (2004). Why men won't ask for directions: The seductions of sociobiology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
GarciaJ. R., GeherG., CrosierB., SaadG., GambacortaD., JohnsenL., & PranckitasE. (2011). The interdisciplinarity of evolutionary approaches to human behavior: A key to survival in the ivory archipelago. Futures, 43, 749–761. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.018
41.
GottschallJ., & WilsonD. S.. (2006). The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
42.
GreenleesI. A., & McGrewW. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59–72. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5
43.
GrodalT. (2004). Love and desire in the cinema. Cinema Journal, 43, 26–46. doi:10.1353/cj.2004.0005
44.
GrodalT. (2007). Pain, sadness, aggression, and joy: An evolutionary approach to film emotions. Projections, 1, 91–107. doi:10.3167/proj.2007.010107
45.
GrossP. R., & LevittN. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
GudelunasD. (2008). Confidential to America: Newspaper advice columns and sexual education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
47.
HameedS. (2008). Bracing for Islamic creationism. Science, 322, 1637–1638. doi:10.1126/science.1163672
48.
HassettJ. M., SiebertE. R., & WallenK. (2008). Sex differences in Rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Hormones and Behavior, 54, 359–364. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.03.008
49.
HeyesC., & HullD. L.. (2001). Selection theory and social construction: The evolutionary naturalistic epistemology of Donald T. Campbell. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
50.
HeywoodL., & GarciaJ. R. (2010). Ins and outs: An evolutionary approach to fashion. In AndrewsA. & CarrollJ., The evolutionary review: Art, science, culture (Vol. 1, pp. 30–35). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
51.
HodgsonG. M., & KnudsenT. (2010). Darwin's conjecture: The search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
HortonD. (1957). The dialogue of courtship in popular songs. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 569–578. doi:10.1086/222105
JianhuiL., & FanH. (2003). Science as ideology: The rejection and reception of sociobiology in China. Journal of the History of Biology, 36, 567–578. doi:10.1023/B:HIST.0000004580.34274.78
55.
JumonvilleN. (2002). The cultural politics of the sociobiology debate. Journal of the History of Biology, 35, 569–593. doi:10.1023/A:1021190227056
56.
KanazawaS. (2006). No, it ain't gonna be like that. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 120–128.
57.
KellertS. R., HeerwagenJ., & MadorM.. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. New York, NY: Wiley.
58.
KramerM. (2004). The mating game in Hollywood cinema. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 2, 137–159. doi:10.1080/1740030042000276626
59.
KurzbanR., & WeedenJ. (2005). HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227–244. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.012
60.
LalandK. N., Odling-SmeeJ., & MylesS. (2010). How culture shaped the human genome: Bringing genetics and the human sciences together. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11, 137–148. doi:10.1038/nrg2734
61.
LancasterR. N. (2003). The trouble with nature: Sex in science and popular culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
LinkeS. (2011). Contexts constrain science in the public: How the sociobiology debate was (not) presented in the German press. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0963662510394250
63.
MartindaleC. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
64.
MendenhallZ., SaadG., & NepomucenoM. V. (2010). Homo Virtualensis: Evolutionary psychology as a tool for studying videogames. In KockN., Evolutionary psychology and information systems research: A new approach to studying the effects of modern technologies on human behavior (pp. 305–328). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
65.
MesoudiA. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
66.
MillerG. (2006a). The Asian future of evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 107–119.
67.
MillerG. (2006b). Asian creativity: A response to Satoshi Kanazawa. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 129–137.
68.
MillerG. F. (1999). Sexual selection for cultural displays. In DunbarR., KnightC., & PowerC., The evolution of culture (pp. 71–91). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
69.
MillerG. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Doubleday.
70.
MillerJ. D., ScottE. C., & OkamotoS. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766. doi:10.1126/science.1126746
71.
MonsonD. A. (2011). Why is la Belle Dame sans Merci? Evolutionary psychology and the troubadours. Neophilologus, 95, 523–541. doi:10.1007/s11061-011-9256-2
72.
NeaveN., McCartyK., FreynikJ., CaplanN., HönekoppJ., & FinkB. (2011). Male dance moves that catch a woman's eye. Biology Letters, 7, 221–224. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0619
73.
OstlundD. R., & KinnierR. T. (1997). Values of youth: Messages from the most popular songs of four decades. Journal of Humanistic Education & Development, 36, 83–91. doi:10.1002/j.2164-4683.1997.tb00376.x
74.
ParrottR. L., SilkK. J., & ConditC. (2003). Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: Genes, environments, and personal behaviors. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1099–1109. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00106-5
75.
PekerD., ComertG. G., & KenceA. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19, 739–755.
76.
PoundN. (2002). Male interest in visual cues of sperm competition risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 443–466. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00103-4
77.
PyysiäinenI., & HauserM. (2010). The origins of religion: Evolved adaptation or by-product?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 104–109. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.007
78.
RichersonP. J., & BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
RoseH., & RoseS.. (2000). Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. London, England: Jonathan Cape.
80.
SaadG. (2004). Applying evolutionary psychology in understanding the representation of women in advertisements. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 593–612.
81.
SaadG. (2007). The evolutionary bases of consumption. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82.
SaadG. (2011a). The consuming instinct: What juicy burgers, Ferraris, pornography, and gift giving reveal about human nature. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
83.
SaadG. (2011b). Song lyrics as windows to our evolved human nature. In AndrewsA. & CarrollJ., The evolutionary review: Art, science, culture (Vol. 2, pp. 127–133). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
84.
SaadG. (2011c). Futures of evolutionary psychology. Futures, 43, 725–728. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.015
85.
SakuraO. (1998). Similarities and varieties: A brief sketch on the reception of Darwinism and sociobiology in Japan. Biology and Philosophy, 13, 341–357. doi:10.1023/A:1006504623820
86.
SalmonC., & SymonsD. (2003). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution and female sexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
87.
SegerstråleU. (2001). Defenders of the truth: The sociobiology debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
88.
SetäläV., & VäliverronenE. (2011). Public perception of evolution and the rise of evolutionary psychology in Finland. Public Understanding of Science, 20, 558–573. doi:10.1177/0963662509358502
89.
ShermanP. W., & BillingJ. (1999). Darwinian gastronomy: Why we use spices. BioScience, 49, 453–463. doi:10.2307/1313553
90.
SimontonD. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
91.
SokalA. D., & BricmontJ. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals' abuse of science. New York, NY: Picador.
92.
TishkoffS. A., ReedF. A., RanciaroA., VoightB. F., BabbittC. C., SilvermanJ. S., … DeloukasP. (2007). Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nature Genetics, 39, 31–40. doi:10.1038/ng1946
93.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB., Sexual selection and descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
94.
TsuiE. (1999). Evolutionary architecture: Nature as a basis for design. New York, NY: Wiley.
95.
TyburJ. M., MillerG. F., & GangestadS. W. (2007). Testing the controversy: An empirical examination of adaptationists' attitudes toward politics and science. Human Nature, 18, 313–328. doi:10.1007/s12110-007-9024-y
WardA., WallaertM., & SchwartzB. (2011). Who likes evolution? Dissociation of human evolution versus evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5, 122–130.
98.
WebsterG. D., JonasonP. K., & SchemberT. O. (2009). Hot topics and popular papers in evolutionary psychology: Analyses of title words and citation counts in Evolution and Human Behavior, 1979–2008. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 348–362.
99.
WebsterG. D. (2007a). What's in a name: Is “evolutionary psychology” eclipsing “sociobiology” in the scientific literature. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 683–695.
100.
WebsterG. D. (2007b). Evolutionary theory's increasing role in personality and social psychology. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 84–91.
101.
WebsterG. D. (2007c). Evolutionary theory in cognitive neuroscience: A 20-year quantitative review of publication trends. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 520–530.
102.
WiedermanM. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331–352. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90003-Z
103.
WilsonD. S. (2002). Darwin's cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
104.
WilsonE. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105.
WilsonE. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. London, England: Abacus.
106.
WranghamR. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York, NY: Basic Books.
