Local Adaptations of Generic Application Systems: The Case of Veiling Holambra in Brazil

Abstract

This paper focuses on local adaptations, referring to the significant or subtle changes local firms make in their local business processes and rules in order to fit with a generic application system, and to the changes they make in the features of a generic application system. Local adaptations are therefore bidirectional in nature. Although several studies stress the importance of local adaptations for the overall success of information technologies (IT) used across locations, more research is needed regarding what kind of local adaptations are required for a particular generic application system to work well in particular localities. The nature and extent of local adaptations are still poorly understood. This paper provides a concrete illustration of a historically situated local adaptation: the case of Veiling Holambra. This Brazilian cooperative has imported a generic auction marketplace model from Holland and adapted it to local conditions, to succeed in a globalized and competitive flower market. Using concepts drawn from studies on globalization, cross-cultural implementations, and IT-based organizational change literature, we put forward three propositions that help to explain the success of local adaptations. The results of our case study indicate that the immigration of Dutch people was critical for bringing knowledge of cooperative structure and flower production to Holambra and led to a relatively small design-use gap. The ability to take local, contextual requirements into account without neglecting the ‘generic’ knowledge led to the successful implementation of the generic auction model. This mutual influence was particularly enabled by the Brazilian culture of improvization.

Keywords

IT implementation local adaptations cross-cultural implementation organizational improvizations mutual-influences perspective historical approach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avgerou

, and Walsham

(2000). Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries, Ashgate: Aldershot.

Bada

(2002). Local Adaptations to Global Trends: A Study of an IT-based Organizational Change Program in a Nigerian Bank, Information Society 18(2): 77–86.

Bada

, Aniebonam

M.C.

, and Owei

(2004). Institutional Pressures as Sources of Improvisations: A Case Study from a Developing Country Context, Journal of Global Information Technology Management 7(3): 27–44.

Barbosa

(1992). O Jeitinho Brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

Beck

(2000). What is Globalization?, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brown

(1998). Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implementation, Journal of Management Studies 35(1): 35–59.

Burn

J.M.

, and Loch

K.D.

(2001). The Societal Impact of the World Wide Web – Key Challenges for the 21st Century, Information Resources Management Journal 14(4): 4–14.

Caldas

M.P.

, and Wood

(1997). For the English to See: The Importation of Managerial Technology in Late 20th Century Brazil, Working Paper FGVSP, Brazil.

Ciborra

C.U.

(1999). A Theory of Information Systems Based on Improvisation, in Currie

, and Galliers

(eds.) Rethinking Management Information Systems, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 136–155.

10.

Cunden

, and van Heck

(2004). Bargaining Power and Information Technology in African-European Business Relationships: Case of the Dutch Flower Auctions, European Management Journal 22(5): 573–587.

11.

DaMatta

(1989). 0 Que Faz o Brasil, Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.

12.

Denzin

N.K.

, and Lincoln

Y.S.

(2005). Handbook of Qualitative Research, California: Sage Publications.

13.

Driedonks

, Gregor

, Wassenaar

, and van Heck

(2005). Economic and Social Analysis of the Adoption of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: A Case Study in the Australian Beef Industry, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(3): 49–72.

14.

Eisenhardt

K.M.

(1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–548.

15.

Giddens

(1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Glesne

(1999). Becoming Qualitative Researchers, New York: Longman.

17.

Heeks

(2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations, Information Society 18(2): 101–112.

18.

Held

, McGrew

, Goldblatt

, and Perraton

(1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press.

19.

Kambil

, and van Heck

(1998). Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations, Information Systems Research 9(1): 1–19.

20.

Kambil

, and van Heck

(2002). Making Markets, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

21.

Koppius

O.R.

(2002). Information Architecture and Electronic Market Performance, Ph.D. Dissertation, Erasmus University.

22.

Land

F.F.

(1992). The Information Systems Domain, in Galliers

(ed.) Information Systems Research: Issues, Methodologies, and Practical Guidelines, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, pp. 6–13.

23.

Land

F.F.

, and Hirschheim

R.A.

(1983). Participative Systems Design: Its Rationale, Tools and Techniques, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 10: 91–107.

24.

Mason

R.O.

, McKenney

J.L.

, and Copeland

D.G.

(1997). An Historical Method for MIS Research: Steps and Assumptions, MIS Quarterly 21(3): 307–320.

25.

McLoughlin

., Badham

, and Couchman

(2000). Rethinking Political Process in Technological Change: Socio-Technical Configurations and Frames, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 12(1): 17–36.

26.

Mitleton-Kelly

(2003). Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organizations: The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations, London: Pergamon.

27.

Orlikowski

(1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective, Information Systems Research 7(1): 63–92.

28.

Orlikowski

W.J.

, and Hofman

J.D.

(1997). An Improvisational Model for Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies, Sloan Management Review 33(2): 11–21.

29.

Orlikowski

W.J.

, and Iacono

C.S.

(2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking ‘IT’ in IT Research – A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact, Information Systems Research 12(2): 121–135.

30.

Pozzebon

(2003). The Implementation of Configurable Information Systems: Negotiations between Global Principles and Local Contexts, PhD Dissertation, McGill University.

31.

Robertson

(1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage.

32.

Rolland

K.H.

, and Monteiro

(2002). Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems, Information Society 18(2): 87–100.

33.

Sagi

, Carayannis

, Dasgupta

, and Thomas

(2004). ICT and Business in the New Economy: Globalization and Attitudes Towards eCommerce, Journal of Global Information Management 12(3): 44–64.

34.

Silva

L.O.

(2002). Outsourcing as an Improvisation: A Case Study in Latin America, Information Society 18(2): 129–138.

35.

Stake

R.E.

(1998). Case Studies, in Denzin

N.K.

, and Lincoln

Y.S.

(eds.) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, California: Sage Publication, pp. 86–109.

36.

Swan

, Newell

, and Robertson

(2000). The Diffusion, Design and Social Shaping of Production Management Information Systems in Europe, Information Technology and People 13: 27–45.

37.

Walsham

(2000). IT, Globalization and Cultural Diversity, in Avgerou

, and Walsham

(eds.) Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 291–303.

38.

Walsham

(2002). Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis, MIS Quarterly 26(4): 359–380.

39.

Weick

(1993). Organizational Redesign as Improvisation, in Huber

G.P.

, and Glick

W.H.

(eds.) Organizational Change and Redesign, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 346–379.

40.

Williams

(1997). Universal Solutions or Local Contingencies? Tensions and Contradictions in the Mutual Shaping of Technology and Work Organization, in McLoughlin

Ian

, and Harris

Martin

(eds.) Innovation, Organization Change and Technology, International Thomson Business Press, pp. 170–185.