An Approach to Urban Modelling and Evaluation a Residential Model: 1. Theory

Abstract

This is the first of three papers describing a model of housing demand. The present paper sets out the theoretical framework for the model, which is based on a number of recent theories in economics. The main interest in the research lies in the development of urban models for obtaining information directly relevant to the analysis of costs and benefits for alternative urban programs, in this case housing programs. The research for the housing model, therefore, is concerned with housing services, their relative demand prices, and demand equations for these services. The second paper, “A residential model: 2. Implicit prices for housing services”, contains results for demand prices for housing characteristics as services estimated by multiple regression analysis, using data for selling price and housing characteristics from the town of Reading, Berkshire. The research described in the third paper, “A residential model: 3. Demand equations for housing services”, includes results for the wide differences in prices for similar housing between tenure groups, and for demand equations for housing services at three levels of aggregation as a function of household attributes of income, social status, stage in family cycle, and household size.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

, 1970, “Urban systems: Data on household income and socio-economic group”, WP-37, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

Apps

Patricia

, 1971a, “A residential model: 1. Theory”, WP-59, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

Apps

Patricia

, 1971b, “A residential model: 2. Prices and price indices for housing services”, WP-60, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

Apps

Patricia

, 1971c, “A residential model: 3. Demand equations”, WP-61, Land Use and Built Form Studies, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

Apps

Patricia

, 1972, “Urban design and the problem of evaluation”, in Social Sciences in Environmental Design, Architectural Psychology Research Unit, University of Sydney, Australia.

Apps

Patricia

, 1973, “A critique of urban planning: Directions for research”, Royal Australian Planning Institute Journal 11, 8–15.

Becker

G. S.

, 1965, “A theory of the allocation of time”, The Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.

Buchanan

Skinner

B. J.

, 1971, “Evaluation of housing stock and its environment”, Journal of the Town Planning Institute, 57, 372–375.

Gorman

W. M.

, 1959, “Separable utility and aggregation”, Econometrics, 27, 469–481.

10.

Griliches

, 1961, “Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: An econometric analysis of quality changes”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Price Statistics of the Federal Government (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, USA).

11.

Griliches

, 1968, “Hedonic price indexes revisited: Some notes on the state of the art”, Report 6802, Centre for Mathematical Studies in Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.

12.

Haavelmo

, 1960, A Study in the Theory of Investment (Chicago University Press, Chicago).

13.

Harcourt

G. C.

Laing

N. F.

(Eds.), 1971, Capital and Growth (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth).

14.

Harrison

A. J.

Quarmy

D. A.

, 1970, “The value of time in transport planning: A review”, MAU Note 154, Department of the Environment, London.

15.

Henderson

J. M.

Quandt

R. E.

, 1958, Micro economic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).

16.

Ironmonger

D. S.

, 1961, New Commodities and Quality Changes in the Theory and Measurement of Consumer Behaviour, Ph. D. Thesis, St. Catherine's College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.

17.

Kirwan

R. M.

Martin

D. B.

, 1970, “The economic basis for models of the housing market”, WP-62, Centre for Environmental Studies, London.

18.

Lancaster

K. J.

, 1966a, “A new approach to consumer theory”, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.

19.

Lancaster

K. J.

, 1966b, “Allocation and distribution theory: Technological innovation and progress. Change and innovation in the technology of consumption”, American Economic Review, 56 (2), 15–23.

20.

Lancaster

K. J.

, 1969, Introduction to Modern Microeconomics (Rand McNally, Chicago).

21.

Lowry

I. S.

, 1964, “A model of metropolis”, RM-4035-RC, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, USA.

22.

Robinson

, 1953, “The production of function and the theory of capital”, Review of Economic Studies, 21, 81–106.

23.

Strotz

R. H.

, 1957, “The empirical implications of a utility tree”, Econometrica, 25, 296–280.

24.

Strotz

R. H.

, 1959, “The utility tree: A correction and further appraisal”, Econometrica, 27, 482–488.

25.

Wilson

A. G.

, 1971, “Microeconomic modelling and spatio-temporal organizations”, paper delivered at the Urban Economic Conference, University of Keele, 6–9 July 1971.