This paper discusses the issue of intertemporal equity in terms of conservation of the resource base. Maximisation of present value is seen as a ‘dictatorship of the present’ leading to intertemporal inconsistency. The alternative perspective, that of a Rawlsian original position, suggests replication of the resource base over time as a social goal, and the need for mechanisms more active than resource reservation to work toward this objective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgriaS, 1969“Special tax treatment of mineral industries” in The Taxation of Income from Capital Eds HorbergerABaileyM (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) pp 77–122
2.
ArrowK, 1951Social Choice and Individual Values Cowles Foundation Monograph number 12 (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.)
3.
ArrowK, 1973“Rawls's principle of just saving”Swedish Journal of Economics75323–335
4.
BarnettHMorseC, 1963Scarcity and Growth (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore)
5.
HotellingH, 1931“The economics of exhaustible resources”Journal of Political Economy39137–175
6.
MishanE, 1975“The folklore of the market”Journal of Economic Issues9681–752
7.
PageT, 1977aConservation and Economic Efficiency (The Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore)
8.
PageT, 1977bIntertemporal and International Aspects of Virgin Material TaxesSymposium held at Bellagio, Italy, 12–16 November 1976, Eds PierceD, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, I Walter, New York University, to be published
9.
RamseyF, 1928“A mathematical theory of saving”The Economic Journal38543–559
10.
RawlsJ M, 1971A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.)
11.
SolowR, 1974“Intergenerational equity”Review of Economic Studies4129–45
12.
StrotzR, 1955–1956“Mytopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization”Review of Economic Studies23165–180
13.
VickreyW, 1967“Economic criteria for optimum rates of depletion” in Extractive Resources and Taxation Ed. GaffneyH (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison) pp 315–330