Predictive models which combine residential location with transportation are presented in this paper. These models predict residential location and the use and performance of the transportation system for exogenously given total housing stock and employment locations. One can use them to determine the impact on the transportation system of changes in the supply of housing or reciprocally to determine the impact on housing choices of new investments in the transportation system. They are formulated as mathematical programs generalizing the Herbert–Stevens model of residential location to include previously proposed equilibrium models of trip assignment, trip distribution, and modal choice. A solution methodology is proposed for prediction and calibration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass)
2.
AnasA, 1973“A dynamic disequilibrium model of residential location”Environment and Planning5633–647
3.
AnasA, 1975“The empirical calibration and testing of a simulation model of residential location”Environment and Planning A7899–920
4.
ArnottR JMacKinnonJ G, 1977“The effects of urban transportation changes: A general equilibrium simulation”Journal of Public Economics819–36
5.
BerechmanJ, 1976“Interfacing the urban land use activity system and the transportation system”Journal of Regional Science16183–194
6.
BerechmanJ, 1978“A general framework for the integration of a land-use model with a transportation model component” Working Paper, Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
7.
BoyceD E, 1978“Equilibrium solutions to combined urban residential location, modal choice and trip assignment models” in Competition among Small Regions Eds BurhWFriedrichP, (Nomos, Baden-Baden) pp 246–264
8.
BoyceD ESouthworthF, 1979“Quasi-dynamic urban-location models with endogenously determined travel costs”Environment and Planning A11575–584
9.
ChampernowneA FWilliamsH C W LCoelhoJ D, 1976“Some comments on urban travel demand analysis, model calibration and the economic evaluation of transport plans”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy10261–285
10.
ErlanderSNguyenSStewartN F, 1978“On the calibration of the combined distribution assignment model” Publication 100, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
11.
EvansS P, 1973“A relationship between the gravity model for trip distribution and the transportation problem in linear programming”Transportation Research739–61
12.
EvansS P, 1976“Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment”Transportation Research1037–57
13.
FerlandJ AFlorianMAchimC, 1975“On incremental methods for traffic assignment”Transportation Research9237–239
FlorianMLosM, 1978“The impact of the supply of parking spaces on parking lot choice” Publication 86, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; forthcoming in Transportation Research
FlorianMNguyenSFerlandJ, 1975“On the combined distribution assignment of traffic”Transportation Science943–53
20.
FrankMWolfeP, 1956“An algorithm for quadratic programming”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly395–110
21.
HarrisB, 1962“Linear programming and the projection of land uses” Paper 20, Penn–Jersey Transportation Study, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
22.
HarrisB, 1966“Basic assumptions for a simulation of the urban residential housing and land market”Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
23.
HarrisB, 1976“A code for the transportation problem of linear programming”Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery23155–157
24.
HarrisBWheatonW, 1972“Linear programming and locational equilibrium: The Herbert–Stevens model revisited” Working Paper, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
25.
HårsmanBSnickarsF, 1975“Disaggregated housing demand models: Some theoretical approaches”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association34121–143
26.
HerbertD JStevensB H, 1960“A model for the distribution of residential activity in urban areas”Journal of Regional Science221–36
27.
IngramG KKainJ FGinnJ R, 1972The Detroit Prototype of the NBER Urban Simulation Model (Columbia University Press, New York)
28.
KeeneyR LRaiffaH, 1976Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley, New York)
29.
LermanS R, 1975“Application of choice theory to residential location and related household decisions” Working Paper, Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass
30.
LermanS R, 1976“The use of joint disaggregate choice models for residential location decisions” Working Paper, Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass
31.
LosM, 1979“Determining modal choice and station choice for a rail transit line”The Logistics and Transportation Review15335–358
32.
LowryI S, 1964“A model of metropolis” RM-4125-RC, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.
33.
McFaddenD, 1978“Modelling the choice of residential location” in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models Eds KarlqvistALundqvistLSnickarsFWeibullJ W, (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 75–96
34.
PutmanS H, 1973The Interrelationships of Transportation Development and Land Development (Urban Planning Division, Office of Highway Planning, Federal Highways Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC)
35.
PutmanS H, 1975“Urban land use and transportation models: A state-of-the-art summary”Transportation Research9187–202
36.
SeniorM L, 1973“Approaches to residential location modelling 1: Urban ecological and spatial interactions models (a review)”Environment and Planning5165–197
37.
SeniorM L, 1974“Approaches to residential location modelling 2: Urban economic models and some recent developments (a review)”Environment and Planning A6369–409
38.
SeniorM L, 1977“Residential location” in Models of Cities and Regions—Theoretical and Empirical Developments Eds WilsonA GReesP HLeighC M, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 283–321
39.
SeniorM LWilsonA G, 1973“Disaggregated residential location models: Some tests and further theoretical developments” in London Papers in Regional Science 4. Space–Time Concepts in Urban and Regional Models Ed. CrippsE L, (Pion, London) pp 141–172
40.
SeniorM LWilsonA G, 1974“Explorations and syntheses of linear programming and spatial interaction models of residential location”Geographical Analysis6209–238
41.
WheatonW, 1974“Linear programming and locational equilibrium: The Herbert–Stevens model revisited”Journal of Urban Economics1278–287
42.
WilliamsH C W L, 1977“On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit”Environment and Planning A9285–344
43.
WilliamsH C W LSeniorM L, 1978“Accessibility, spatial interaction and the spatial benefit analysis of land use–transportation plans” in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models Eds KarlqvistALundqvistLSnickarsFWeibullJ W, (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 253–287
44.
WilsonA G, 1970Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling (Pion, London)
45.
WilsonA GSeniorM L, 1974“Some relationships between entropy-maximizing models, mathematical programming models and their duals”Journal of Regional Science14207–215
46.
ZangwillW I, 1969Nonlinear Programming: A Unified Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
