The phenomenon of corporate interlocks among large American corporations is examined in the context of an information network. This information network is analyzed at the regional level by use of multidimensional scaling. Three characteristics used in the selection of directors are revealed; the length of service of the chief executive officer, whether the region is a traditional manufacturing region, and whether the region of the headquarters of a corporation is east or west of the Mississippi River. These factors help to explain the bias of the manufacturing belt for selection of directors within the belt, and may be a contributing cause of the decline of the region.
DickenP, 1971“Some aspects of the decision making behavior of business organizations”Economic Geography47426–437
3.
Fortune1978a“The Fortune 500”97 (8th May) 240–256
4.
Fortune1978b“The Fortune directory of the fifty largest commercial banking companies, life insurance companies, diversified financial, retailing companies, transportation companies, and utilities”98 (17th July) 116–131
5.
GoddardJ B, 1971“Office communications and office location: A review of current research”Regional Studies5263–280
6.
GreenM B, 1980A Geographical Examination of Interlocking Directorates for Large American Corporations PhD thesis, Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA)
7.
GreenP H, 1977“Industrialists information levels of regional incentive”Regional Studies117–18
8.
HoareA G, 1978“Industrial linkages and the dual economy: The case of Northern Ireland”Regional Studies12167–180
9.
KruskalWWishM, 1978Multidimensional Scaling (Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.)
10.
LeHeronR BSchmidtC G, 1976“An exploratory analysis of linkage change within two regional industries”Regional Studies10465–478
11.
LevineJ G, 1972“The sphere of influence”American Sociological Review3714–27
12.
MacCallumRC, 1978“Recovery of structure in incomplete data by ALSCAL”Psychometrika4469–74
13.
MarshallJ N, 1979“Ownership, organization and industrial linkage: A case study in the northern region of England”Regional Studies13531–557
14.
NicholsonM S, 1972Duties and Liabilities of Corporate Officers and Directors (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
15.
OlsonM, 1977“The causes and quality of southern growth” in The Economics of Southern Growth Eds LinearE BLynchL K (The Seeman Printery, Durham, NC) pp 107–130
16.
PfefferJSalancikG R, 1978The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York)
17.
PredA, 1977City Systems on Advanced Economics (Halsted Press, New York)
18.
SmithD M, 1970“On throwing Weber out with the bathwater”Area315–18
19.
SpenceIDomoneyD W, 1977“Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling”Psychometrika39469–489
20.
SPR, 1979Standard and Poor's Register of Corporation Offices and Directors 1979Standard and Poor's Corporation, New York
21.
TakaneYYoungF WDeLeeuwJ, 1977“Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features”Psychometrika427–67
22.
TaylorM J, 1975“Organizational growth, spatial interaction and location decision-making”Regional Studies9313–323
23.
ThorngrenB, 1970“How do contact systems affect regional development”Environment and Planning2409–427
24.
TorgersonW S, 1958Theory and Methods of Scaling (John Wiley, New York)
25.
TörnqvistG, 1970Contact Systems and Regional Development Lund Studies in Geography 35B (CWK Gleerup, Stockholm)
26.
US House of Representatives, 1965Report on Interlocking in Corporate ManagementCommittee on the Judiciary, US House of Representatives (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
27.
US National Resources Committee, 1939The Structure of the American Economy Part 1: Basic Characteristics (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
28.
US Senate, 1978Interlocking Directorates Among the Major US CorporationsUS Senate Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting, and Management of the Committee on Governmental Affairs (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
29.
WarnerW LUnwallaD B, 1967“The system of interlocking directorates” in The Emergent American Society ed. WarnerW L (Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.)
30.
WoodP A, 1969“Industrial location and linkage”Area233–39
31.
ZaldM N, 1969“The power and functions of boards of directors: A theoretical synthesis”American Journal of Sociology7597–111
