The research presented here is a continuation of the work published in a previous issue of this journal. The overall objective was to relate travel patterns and urban structure using continuous spatial distributions and urban-economic concepts of residential location choice. In the present paper, model hypotheses are tested using data from a transportation planning study in Washington.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjoR, 1965, “On the structure of population density in London's field”Acta Geographica181–17
2.
AngelSHymanG M, 1972, “Urban spatial interaction”Environment and Planning499–118
3.
AynvargY S, 1969, “Zones of influence of middle-size cities, their boundaries and passenger flows”Soviet Geography10549–558
4.
BachiR, 1957, “Statistical analysis of geographic series”Bulletin de l'Institut International de Statistique36229–240
5.
BeckmannM JGolobT FZahaviY, 1983, “Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: 1. Theory”Environment and Planning A15593–606
6.
BlumenfeldD EWeissG H, 1974, “Some radial and direction-dependent models for densities of homes and workplaces”Transportation Research8149–155
7.
ChowG C, 1960, “Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions”Econometrica28591–605
8.
ChumakABraaksmaJ P, 1981, “Implications of the travel-time budget for urban transportation modeling in Canada”Transportation Research Record79419–27
9.
ClarkC, 1951, “Urban population densities”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A114490–496
10.
EdmonstonB, 1975Population Distribution in American Cities (D C Heath, Lexington, MA)
11.
GuestA, 1973, “Urban growth and population densities”Demography1053–69
12.
MillsE S, 1970, “Urban density functions”Urban Studies75–20
13.
MogridgeM J H, 1973, “Some thoughts on the economics of intra-urban spatial locations of homes, worker residences and workplaces” report CP9, Centre for Environmental Studies, London WC2
14.
MuthR F, 1969Cities and Housing (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
15.
ZahaviY, 1979The UMOT Project report DOT-RSPA-DPB-20-79-3, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
16.
ZahaviY, 1982The UMOT Travel Model-IIUS Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC
17.
ZahaviYBeckmannM JGolobT F, 1981The UMOT/Urban Interactions report DOT/RSPA/DPB-10/7, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
18.
ZahaviYRyanJ M, 1980, “Stability of travel components over time”Transportation Research Record75019–26
19.
ZahaviYTalvitieA, 1980, “Regularities in travel time and money expenditures”Transportation Research Record75013–19
