This paper is a preliminary review of small firm subcontracting. It is argued that increasingly subcontracting and other forms of small firm activities are becoming a central part of the operations of large firms. As a result, small firms have to be viewed as central elements in the economy. In this paper three issues are reviewed as a prerequisite to empirical research. First, an outline is presented of theoretical proposals on interfirm linkages. Second, the nature of subcontracting is outlined. The paper concludes with a categorisation of different ways in which subcontracting relations are formed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BagnascoA, 1981, âLabour markets, class structure and regional formations in ItalyâInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research540â44.
2.
BergerSPioreM J, 1980Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
3.
BeynonHHudsonRLewisDSadlerDTownsendA, 1985, âMiddlesbrough: Contradictions in economic and cultural changeâ working paper, Project Team, Changing Urban and Regional Systems Project, Department of Geography and Sociology, University of Durham, Durham.
4.
BIM, 1985, âManaging new patterns of workâreport of the Organisation of Work Panel of the BIM Economic and Social Affairs Committee, British Institute of Management, Management House, Parker St, London WC2.
5.
BoltonJ E, 1971, âReport of the Committee on Inquiry on Small Firmsâ Cmnd 4811 (HMSO, London).
6.
BruscoS, 1982, âThe Emilian model: Productive decentralization and social integrationâThe Cambridge Journal of Economics6167â184.
7.
BruscoSSabelC, 1981, âArtisan production and economic growthâThe Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 99â114.
8.
ChaillouB, 1977, âDefinition et typologie de la sous traitanceâRevue Economique28262â285.
9.
CookePEvansC, 1985, âHomeworking in Britainâ apaper presented at the Urban and Regional Change Conference, University of Sussex, 16â19 April 1985; copy obtainable from P Cooke, Department of Town Planning, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff.
10.
CookePda RosaPires A, 1985, âProduction decentralisation in three European regionsâEnvironment and Planning A17527â554.
11.
CurranJStanworthC W, 1983, âFranchising in the modern economy: Towards a theoretical understandingâInternational Small Business Journal2(1) 8â26.
12.
EdwardsR, 1979Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Work Place in the Twentieth Century (Heinemann Educational Books, London).
13.
FredrickssonC GLindmarkL G, 1977, âFrom firms to systems of firms: A study of interregional dependence in a dynamic societyâIndustrial Systems, Volume 1 Eds HamiltonF E ILingeG J K, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 155â186.
14.
FriedmanA, 1977Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism (Macmillan, London).
15.
GordonD MEdwardsRReichM, 1982Segmented Work, Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labour in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
16.
GreenD HWalkerS, 1979, âIndependence and control in relation to the small firmâ WP3, Medium and Small Firms Research Project, School of Town Planning, Leeds Polytechnic, Leeds.
17.
GudginGBrunskillIFothergillS, 1979New Manufacturing Firms in Regional Employment Growth Research Series 39 (CES Books, London).
18.
HoareA, 1978, âIndustrial linkages and the dual economyâRegional Studies12(2) 43â57.
19.
HolmesJ, 1986, âThe organisation and locational structure of production subcontractingâThe Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism: Production, Work and Territory Eds ScottA JStorperM, (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) forthcoming.
20.
ImrieR, 1985, âWork decentralization and industrial change into the 1980sâ a research proposal submitted to the Economic and Social Research Council; copy obtainable from the author.
21.
JohnsonL CJohnsonR E, 1983The Seam Allowance: Industrial Home Sewing in Canada (Women's Press, Toronto).
22.
KaplinskyR, 1983, âFirm size and technical change in a dynamic contextâJournal of Industrial Economics32(1) 39â60.
23.
KayW, 1983, Article on Marks and SpencerSunday Times19 June, page 22.
24.
KeebleD E, 1968, âIndustrial decentralization and the metropolis: The North West London caseâTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers441â54.
25.
KeebleD E, 1976Industrial Location and Planning in the United Kingdom (Methuen, Andover, Hants).
26.
KleinBCrawfordR GAlchainA A, 1982, âVertical integration, approachable rents and the competitive contracting processâEconomic Journal6323â41.
27.
McDermottP J, 1977Regional Variations in Enterprise: Electronics Firms in Scotland, London and the Outer Metropolitan AreaPhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
28.
McDermottP JTaylorM J, 1982Industrial Organisation and Location (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
29.
MarshallJ N, 1980, âSpatial variations in manufacturing industry demand for business services: Some implications for government economic policiesâ WP35, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne.
30.
MasonC MHarrisonR T, 1985, âThe geography of small firms in the UK: Towards a research agendaâProgress in Human Geography9(1) 1â37.
31.
MenschG, 1977Stalemate in Technology (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA).
32.
MingioneE, 1981, âInformation, restructuring and the survival strategies of the working classâInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research7311â339.
33.
MitterS, 1986, âIndustrial restructuring and manufacturing homework: Immigrant women in the UK clothing industryâCapital and Class2737â80.
34.
MooreC W, 1972, âIndustrial linkage development paths in growth poles: A research methodologyâEnvironment and Planning4253â271.
35.
MooreC W, 1973, âIndustrial linkage development paths: A case study of two industrial complexes in the Puget Sound RegionâTijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie6493â107.
36.
MoseleyM JTownroeP M, 1973, âLinkage adjustment following industrial movementâTijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie64137â144.
37.
MurrayR, 1985, âBenetton Britain: The new economic orderâMarxism Today November issue, pp 28â32.
38.
O'FarrellP NO'LoughlinB, 1980, âAn analysis of new industry linkages in Irelandâ publication series paper 6, Industrial Development Authority, Dublin.
39.
RainnieA, 1984, âCombined and uneven development in the clothing industry: The effects of competition and accumulationâCapital and Class2261â73.
40.
RainnieA, 1985, âSmall firms, big problems: The political economy of small businessesâCapital and Class2542â56.
41.
RichardsonG B, 1972, âThe organisation of industryâEconomic Journal82883â896.
42.
RichterC, 1969, âThe impact of industrial linkages on geographic associationâJournal of Regional Science919â28.
43.
RuberyJWilkinsonF, 1981, âOutwork and segmented labour marketsâ in The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 115â132.
SabelC F, 1982Work and Politics: The Division of Labour in Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
46.
ScaseRGoffeeR, 1982The Entrepreneurial Middle Class (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent).
47.
ScottA J, 1984, âIndustrial organisation and the logic of intra metropolitan location III; a case study of the women's dress industry in the Greater Los Angeles AreaâEconomic Geography603â27.
48.
SheardP, 1983, âAuto production systems in Japan: Organisational and locational featuresâAustralian Geographical Studies21(1) 49â68.
49.
ShuttJWhittingtonR, 1984, âLarge firm strategies and the rise of small units: The illusion of small firm job generationâ WP15, North West Industry Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester.
50.
StewartJ C, 1976, âLinkages and foreign direct investmentâRegional Studies10245â258.
51.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1982a, âIndustrial linkage and the segmented economy: 1. Some theoretical proposalsâEnvironment and Planning A141601â1613.
52.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1982b, âIndustrial linkage and the segmented economy: 2. An empirical reinterpretationâEnvironment and Planning A141615â1632.
53.
TaylorM JThriftN J, 1983, âBusiness organisation, segmentation and locationâRegional Studies17445â465.
54.
The Economist, 1984, âFlexible high-flyersâ 29 September, page 79Tokyo.
55.
Metropolitan Council, 1972, âMinor industries and workers in TokyoâTokyo Metropolitan Council, Tokyo.
56.
TGWU, 1983British Leyland: The Next Decadereport by the TGWU in association with AUEW/TASS, Birmingham.
57.
VillaP, 1981, âLabour market segmentation and the construction industry in Italyâ in The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonF, (Academic Press, London) pp 133â150.
58.
WalkerS R, 1977, âLinkage structures in an urban economyâRegional Studies11263â273.
59.
WatanabeS, 1971, âSubcontracting, industrialisation and employment creationâInternational Labour Review10451â76.
60.
WatanabeS, 1972, âInternational subcontracting, employment and skill promotionâInternational Labour Review105425â449.
