The Geography of US Union Elections 4: Patterns of Close Elections and Determinants of the Margins of Victory and Loss (the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union and the United Auto Workers Union,1970–82)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1987
The Geography of US Union Elections 4: Patterns of Close Elections and Determinants of the Margins of Victory and Loss (the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Union and the United Auto Workers Union,1970–82)
Patterns of close union representation elections and the determinants of the margins of victory and loss are the topics of this paper. The importance of close elections for management, unions, and the National Labor Relations Board is emphasized. Likely union and management strategies for contesting close elections are noted, as is the significance of these elections in relation to the changing political and institutional environment of US labor relations. Empirically, a set of structural and contextual variables are used to discriminate between close and nonclose elections. The determinants of close elections are analyzed through a set of regression models, using as dependent variables the margins of victory and loss. Data on close elections are developed from the electoral performance of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union and the United Auto Workers union over the period 1970–82. Implications of these results are considered for the role of the National Labor Relations Board and the effectiveness of management consultants in union representation campaigns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO Committee on the Evolution of Work, 1985The Changing Situation of Workers and their Unions AFL-CIO, 815 16th St. NW, Washington, DC 20006
2.
BlockRRoomkinM, 1982, “A preliminary analysis of the participation rate and margin of victory in NLRB elections” in Proceedings of the Thirty-fourth Annual Winter Meeting Washington, DC (Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, WI) pp 220–226
3.
BluestoneBHarrisonB, 1982The Deindustrialization of America (Basic Books, New York)
4.
Bristol Textile Company, 1986, 277 NLRB 182, 13 January; summarized in Daily Labor Report number 19, 29 January, page A-1
5.
ClarkGL, 1985, “The spatial division of labor and wage and price controls of the Nixon administration”Economic Geography61113–128
6.
ClarkGL, 1986a, “Restructuring the US economy: The National Labor Relations Board, the Saturn project, and economic justice”Economic Geography62 (forthcoming)
7.
ClarkGL, 1986b, “The crisis of the midwest auto industry” in Production, Work, Territory: The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism Eds ScottAStorperM, (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 127–148
8.
ClarkGLGertlerMWhitemanJ, 1986Regional Dynamics: Studies in Adjustment Theory (George Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
9.
ClarkGLJohnstonK, 1987a, “The geography of US union elections 1: The crisis of US unions and a critical review of the literature”Environment and Planning A1933–57
10.
ClarkGLJohnstonK, 1987b, “The geography of US union elections 2: Performance of the United Auto Workers union and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union, 1970–82”Environment and Planning A19153–172
11.
ClarkGLJohnstonK, 1987c, “The geography of US union elections 3: The context and structure of union electoral performance (the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union and the United Auto Workers union, 1970–82)”Environment and Planning A19289–311
12.
Clark Equipment Co., 1986, 278 NLRB 85
13.
ClineW, 1985International Debt: Systemic Risk and Policy Response (Institute for International Economics and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
Clothing and Textile Workers v NRLB, 1984, 117 LRRM 2453 (CA DC)
15.
De BernardoM, 1985, “Forum comments” in NLRB at 50: Labor Board at the Crossroads A BNA Special Report (Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC) pp 7–10
16.
DickensWT, 1983, “The effect of company campaigns: Law and Reality once again”Industrial and Labor Relations Review36560–575
17.
Ecology, Inc. v NLRB, 1985, 9th Cir., 85–7154, 85–7259; reported in Daily Labor Report number 203, 21 October, pages D-1–D-4
18.
EllwoodDFineG, 1983, “Effects of right-to-work laws on union organizing” mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
19.
FarberH, 1984, “Right-to-work laws and the extent of unionization”Journal of Labor Economics2319–352
20.
FrankelK, 1985, “The Wagner Act after fifty years: Where we are—a labor perspective” mimeo, United Steelworkers of America, 5 Gateway Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
21.
FreemanR, 1985, “The effect of the union wage differential on management opposition and union organizing success” mimeo, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
22.
FreemanRMedoffJ, 1984What Do Unions Do? (Basic Books, New York)
23.
General Knit of California, 1978, 239 NLRB 101, 99 LRRM 1687
24.
General Shoe Corp., 1948, 77 NLRB 124, 21 LRRM 1337
25.
GetmanJGoldbergSHermanJ, 1976Union Representation Elections: Law and Reality (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
26.
GordonRJ, 1980, “Postwar macroeconomics: The evolution of events and ideas” in The American Economy in Transition Ed. FeldsteinM, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 101–182
27.
HenemanHSandverM, 1983, “Predicting the outcome of union certification elections: A review of the literature”Industrial and Labor Relations Review36537–559
28.
Hollywood Ceramics Co., 1962, 140 NLRB 221, 51 LRRM 1600
29.
HuxleyCKettlerDStruthersJ, 1986, “Is Canada's experience ‘especially instructive’?” in Unions in Transition: Entering the Second Century Ed. LipsetSM, (Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco, CA) pp 113–132
30.
JohnstonK, 1986, “Judicial adjudication and the spatial structure of production: Two decisions by the National Labor Relations Board”Environment and Planning A1827–39
31.
LawlerJJ, 1984, “The influence of management consultants on the outcome of union certification elections”Industrial and Labor Relations Review3838–51
32.
Michael's Markets of Canterbury Inc., 1985, 274 NLRB 105, 12 March; reported in Daily Labor Report number 63, 4 April, page A-10
33.
Midland National Life Insurance Co., 1982, 263 NLRB 24
34.
NLRB v Idab Inc., 1985, 11th Cir., 85–5532, 10 September; reported in Daily Labour Report number 184, 23 September, pages D-1–D-5
35.
Purolator Armoured, Inc. v NLRB, 1985, 11th Cir., 84–5222, 9 July; reported in Daily Labor Report number 157, 14 August, pages D-1–D-5
VoosP, 1984, “Trends in union organizing expenditures, 1953–1977”Industrial and Labor Relations Review3852–63
38.
WattenbergM, 1984The Decline of American Political Parties 1952–1980 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
39.
WeilerP, 1983, “Promises to keep: Securing workers' rights to self-organization under the NLRA”Harvard Law Review961769–1827
40.
WeilerP, 1984, “Striking a new balance: Freedom of contract and the prospectus for union representation”Harvard Law Review98351–420
41.
WilliamsR, 1985NLRB Regulation of Election Conductrevised edition, Labor Relations and Public Policy Series number 8, Industrial Relations Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
