The impact on the US commercial banking system of government regulation, of increased competition from other financial services sectors, and of new technology is examined in this paper. The banking industry is responding by creating the semblance of an interstate banking system through merger and acquisition. Multibank holding companies have forged regional banking organisations despite federal prohibitions. A model of the bank merger process is presented. In the spatial context, the possible consequences of this merger process include reduction in the number of banks and branch offices, migration of banking functions up the urban hierarchy, and outflow of funds from small cities and rural areas towards regionally important cities and the international market.
BergerFE, 1981, “The emerging transformation of the US banking system”The Banker issue number 13125–39
8.
BurkeJ, 1984, “Antitrust laws, Justice Department guidelines and the limits of concentration in local banking markets” Staff Study number 138 (Federal Reserve, Washington, DC)
9.
CohenRB, 1981, “The new international division of labour, multinational corporations and urban hierarchy”, in Urbanisation and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society Eds DearMScottAJ, (Methuen, Andover, Hants) pp 287–315
10.
Community Reinvestment Act, 1977, Pub. L. 92–128, 91 Stat. 1111, as amended, USC section 2901
11.
DanielsPW, 1985Service Industries: A Geographical Appraisal (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
International Banking Act, 1978, Pub. L. 95–369, 92 Stat. 607, as amended, USC section 72
23.
KaufmanGMoteLRosenblumH, 1983, “Implications of deregulation for product lines and geographical markets of financial institutions”Journal of Bank Research148–21
24.
LordJDLyndsCD, 1984, “Market area planning strategy: An example of interstate banking markets in the USA”GeoJournal9145–154
25.
MarshallJNBachtlerJF, 1984, “Spatial perspectives on technological changes in the banking sector of the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning A16437–450
26.
MartzDC, 1976, “The location research program at Bank of America”Geographical Review66469–476
27.
MartzDJFSempleRK, 1985, “Hierarchical corporate decision-making structure within the Canadian urban system: The case of banking”Urban Geography6316–330
28.
McFadden Act—see Banking Act (1927)
29.
MorrisC, 1984, “The competitive effects of interstate banking”Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (November) 3–16
30.
NicholasT, 1982, “Effects on retail banking”, in The Banks and Technology in the 1980s (The Institute of Bankers, London) pp 19–39
31.
NoyelleTJStanbackTM, 1984The Economic Transformation of American Cities (Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, NJ)
32.
RhoadesSA, 1982, “Bank expansion and merger activity by state, 1960–1975”Journal of Bank Research12254–256
33.
RhoadesSA, 1985, “Mergers and acquisitions by commercial banks, 1960–1983” Staff Study, number 142 (Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC)
34.
SavageDT, 1983, “Developments in banking structure, 1970–1981”Federal Reserve Bulletin6878–85
35.
SchroederFJ, 1983, “Developments in consumer electronic fund transfers”Federal Reserve Bulletin69395–403
36.
StanbackTM, 1979Understanding the Service Economy (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
37.
StanbackTMBearsePJNoyelleTJKarasekRA, 1981Services: The New Economy (Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ)
38.
TaylorMJHirstJ, 1983, “Australian banking: The current round of rationalisation and restructuring”Australian Geographical Studies21266–271
39.
TaylorMJHirstJ, 1984, “Environment, technology, and organisation: The restructuring of the Australian trading banks”Environment and Planning A161055–1078
40.
WheelerJODillonPM, 1985, “The wealth of the nation: Spatial dimensions of US metropolitan commercial banking, 1970–1980”Urban Geography6297–315
