The social sciences have tended to look for logics of social processes or of social structures, both of which may be relatively invariant with respect to specific events or may be viewed as determining specific sequences of events. These models are, by virtue of their deep logic, timeless. Most of the recent attempts in social theory to avoid the functionalism and determinism of timeless models have introduced contingency into the structure—events relationship. In this paper I argue, by contrast, that one needs theoretical apparatuses to explain ‘paths taken’ and ‘paths foreclosed’ in concrete events in social life. Small events have a certain theoretical ‘agency’ in the construction of large social processes and the latter, in turn, are the stuff out of which social structures are ultimately made or broken. The case of technological change and industry location is used to illustrate this logic, and its implications for theories of urbanisation are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArndtH, 1984Economic Theory vs. Economic Reality (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
2.
ArthurW B, 1983, “On competing technologies and historical small events: The dynamics of choice under increasing returns”, unpublished paper, Food Research Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
3.
BarnesTSheppardE, 1984, “Technical choice and reswitching in space economies”Regional Science and Urban Economics14345–362
4.
BluestoneBHarrisonH, 1982The Deindustrialization of America (Basic Books, New York)
5.
CarlingA, 1986, “Rational choice Marxism”New Left Reviewnumber 160, 24–62
6.
ClarkG LGertlerM, 1984, “An adjustment model of regional production”Environment and Planning A17231–252
7.
CohenG A, 1980Marx's Theory of History, A Defense (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
8.
DavidP, 1975Technical Choice, Innovation, and Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
9.
ElsterJ, 1985Making Sense of Marx (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
GertlerM, 1984, “Regional capital theory”Progress in Human Geography850–81
11.
GiddensA, 1979Central Problems in Social Theory (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
12.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
13.
JayM, 1984Marxism and Totality (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
14.
KaldorN, 1972, “The irrelevance of equilibrium economics”The Economic Journal81(2) 1237–1255
15.
MandelE, 1978Late Capatalism (Verso, London)
16.
MarkusenA R, 1985Profit Cycles, Oligopoly, and Regional Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
MarshallA, 1923Industry and Trade (Macmillan, London)
18.
MasseyD B, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labor (Macmillan, London)
19.
NelsonR RWinterS G, 1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
OkishioN, 1961, “Technical change and the rate of profit”Kobe University Economic Review785–99
21.
PasinettiL, 1973Lectures on the Theory of Production (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
22.
PrzeworskiA, 1985Capitalism and Social Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
23.
RobinsonJ, 1956The Accumulation of Capital (Macmillan, London)
24.
RoemerJ, 1980, “A general equilibrium approach to marxian economics”Econometrica48505–530
25.
RoemerJ, 1982A General Theory of Exploitation and Class (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
26.
RosenbergN, 1982Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
27.
SaxenianA, 1985, “Silicon valley and Route 128: Regional prototypes or historic exceptions”, in High Technology, Space and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 81–105
28.
SayerR A, 1984Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (Hutchinson, London)
29.
SchumpeterJ, 1934The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
30.
SemmlerW, 1984Competition, Monopoly, and Differential Profit Rates (Columbia University Press, New York)
31.
ShaikhA, 1980, “The poverty of algebra”, in The Value Controversy Ed. SteedmanI (Verso, London) pp 266–300
32.
SraffaP, 1960Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
33.
StorperM, 1985a, “Oligopoly and the product cycle: Essentialism in economic geography”Economic Geography61260–282
34.
StorperM, 1985b, “Technology and spatial production relations: Disequilibrium, interindustry relationships, and industrial development”, in High Technology, Space and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 265–283
35.
StorperM, 1985c, “The spatial and temporal constitution of social action: A critical reading of Giddens”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space3407–424
36.
StorperM, 1986, “Technology and regional growth complexes: The economics of discontinuous spatial development”, in Technological Change and Employment: Urban and Regional Dimensions Ed. NijkampP (Springer, Berlin) pp 46–75
37.
StorperMChristophersonS, 1987, “Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77(1) 104–117
38.
StorperMWalkerR, 1984, “The price of water: Surplus and subsidy in the California state water project”, monograph series, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
39.
StorperMWalkerR, 1988Explanations of Growth: Geographical Industrialization and Capitalist Development (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) forthcoming
40.
ThompsonE P, 1978The Poverty of Theory (Merlin Press, London)
41.
TillyC, 1984Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
42.
WalkerRStorperM, 1981, “Capital and industrial location”Progress in Human Geography5473–509
43.
WrightE O, 1983, “Giddens' critique of Marxism”New Left Reviewnumber 138, March—April, 11–35
44.
YoungA, 1928, “Increasing returns and economic progress”Economic Journal76527–542
