This paper focuses upon the relationships between management strategy, location decisionmaking, and private pension liabilities. Analysis is based upon a recent suit in federal court brought by past employees of Continental Can Corporation against the corporation, alleging that it had deliberately relocated and restructured production at its Pittsburgh plant so as to illegally avoid early-retirement pension obligations. In narrative form I set out the essential details of the case and document in detail how the corporation reallocated production by plant location and the age and seniority of workers. It is suggested that this kind of locational-restructuring strategy is more common than often supposed and it is argued that corporations' pension obligations have fundamental, but little understood, implications for the process of restructuring American industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amaro v Continental Can Co. (724 F.2d 747 [9th Cir. 1984])
2.
ArrowK, 1985, “The economics of agency”, in Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business Eds PrattJZeckhauserR, (Harvard Business School, Boston, MA) pp 37–51
3.
AuerbachA JReishusD, 1988, “The impact of taxation on mergers and acquisitions”, in Mergers and Acquisitions Ed. AuerbachA J, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 69–86
4.
Baumol W J, Panzor J, Willig R, and others, 1988Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure2nd edition (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York)
5.
BowlesSGordonDWeisskopfT, 1983Beyond the Wasteland: A Democratic Alternative to Economic DeclineDoubleday/Anchor Press, New York)
6.
ClarkG L, 1981, “The employment relation and spatial division of labor: A hypothesis”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71412–424
7.
ClarkG L, 1988, “Regional development and planning: Emerging themes on labor, location and the firm”Progress in Human Geography12549–559
8.
ClarkG L, 1989a, “Law and the interpretive turn in social science”Urban Geography10209–228
9.
ClarkG L, 1989bUnions and Communities under Siege: American Communities and the Crisis of Organized LaborCambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
ClarkG L, 1990, “Restructuring, workers' pensions and the law”Environment and Planning A (forthcoming)
11.
Daily Labor Report1989, 15 May (Number 92) pp D1–D-17
12.
DruckerP, 1988, “Management and the world's work”Harvard Business Review88(5) 65–76
13.
DworkinR, 1986Law's EmpireHarvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
FisherFMcGowanJGreenwoodJ, 1983Folded, Spindled and Mutilated: Economic Analysis and US v IBMMIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
15.
FloridaRKenneyM, 1987, “Japan's role in the postfordist age”, WP 87–38, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
16.
FreemanD, 1988The Misunderstood Miracle: Industrial Development and Political Change in JapanCornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
17.
FreemanR, 1985, “Unions, pensions, and union pension funds”, in Pensions, Labor and Individual Choice Ed. WiseD, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 89–122
General Accounting Office, 1988, “Pension plans and corporate takeovers” GAO/HRD-88-58, Washington, DC
20.
GrahamJGibsonKHorvathRShakowD, 1988, “Restructuring in US manufacturing: The decline of monopoly capitalism”Annals of the Association of American Geographers78473–490
21.
HarrisA, (Ed.), 1987ERISA The Law and the Code: 1987 EditionBureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC)
22.
HarrisonBBluestoneB, 1988The Great U-turnBasic Books, New York)
23.
HarrisonBKluverJ, 1989, “Reassessing the Massachusetts miracle: The sources and patterns of employment and economic growth in the revitalization of a ‘mature’ region”, in Deindustrialization and the Transformation of US Regions Ed. RodwinL, (Unwin Hyman, London and Winchester, MA)
24.
HarveyD, 1988, “The geographical and geopolitical consequences of the transition from Fordist to flexible accumulation”, in America's New Market Geography Eds SternliebGHughesJ, (Center for Urban Policy Research Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 101–134
25.
HaxAMajlufN, 1984Strategic Management: An Integrative ApproachPrentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
26.
HendersonB, 1979Henderson on Corporate StrategyAbt Books, Cambridge, MA)
27.
HillR CNegreyC, 1987, “Deindustrialization in the Great Lakes”Urban Affairs Quarterly22580–597
28.
Inland Steel Co. (77 NLRB 1 [1947])
29.
Inland Steel Co. v NLRB (170 F.2d 247 [1948]) and (336 US 960 [1949])
30.
KenneyMFloridaR, 1988, “Beyond mass production: Production and the labor process in Japan”Politics and Society16121–158
31.
McClendon v Continental Group Inc. (602 F.Supp 1492 [DNJ, 1985])
32.
MarkusenACarlsonV, 1989, “Bowing out, bidding down, and betting on the basics: Midwestern responses to deindustrialization in the 1980s”, in Deindustrialization and the Transformation of US Regions Ed. RodwinL, (Unwin Hyman, London and Winchester, MA)
33.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of ProductionMacmillan, London)
34.
MelmanS, 1983Profits Without ProductionKnopf, New York)
35.
NorthrupH R, 1984, “The rise and demise of PATCO”Industrial and Labor Relations Review37167–184
36.
PaulusJ DWaiteS, 1987, “Competition junk and the merger wave of the 1980s”, Special Economic Study, available from Morgan Stanley and Co., 1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020
37.
PBGC, 1987Annual Report to the CongressPension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
38.
PBGC v The LTV Corporation et al (87 Civ. 7261 [1988])
39.
QuinnD P, 1988Restructuring in the Automobile Industry: A Study of Firms and States in Modern CapitalismColumbia University Press, New York)
40.
RifkinJBarberR, 1978The North Will Rise Again: Pensions Politics and Power in the 1980sBeacon Press, Boston, MA)
41.
RodwinL, 1989, “Deindustrialization and regional transformation”, in Deindustrialization and the Transformation of US Regions Ed. RodwinL, (Unwin Hyman, London and Winchester, MA)
42.
Securities and Exchange Commission, 10-K Form (K585770), Washington, DC
43.
ShleiferAVishnyR, 1988, “Management buyouts as a response to market pressure”, in Mergers and Acquisitions Ed. AuerbachA J, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 87–102
44.
Steel Industry Board, 1949Report to the President of the United States on the Labor Dispute in the Basic Steel Industry available from the National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DCUnited Steelworkers of America, 19771977 Steel Settlement Booklet No. PR-229 (United Steelworkers of America, Pittsburgh, PA)
