A method is described to trace ‘locality’, or spatial variations in policy, through comparative analysis. It is argued that the problem of structure versus agency can never be solved once and for all by philosophical arguments, but always has to be rephrased into empirically manageable terms. This is possible through use of the ‘most similar’ approach of comparative analysis. When external structural determinants of policy are kept under control, local variations can be traced back to locally specific determinants. These determinants must be examined in depth through case studies. This also paves the way for empirically based counterfactual reasoning. Thus, the extent to which local actors are not just forced by structural determinants to act in a certain way can be estimated. The general approach is illustrated by reference to a case study of local housing policies in Sweden. Some critical questions are raised. One must not forget that structures and actors, whether national or local, are inseparably bound up with processes, and that ‘structures’ are always just crystallised results of human action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssonRBergerSHaraldssonKLundmarkMMalmbergAÖhmanJ, 1987, “Maktutbredningen: Om resurser och beroenden i Sveriges kommuner” (The power extension: On resources and dependencies in the municipalities of Sweden), Department of Social and Economic Geography, University of Uppsala, Uppsala
2.
Arkitektur1979, special issue on Örebro Swedish Journal of Architecture79(6)
3.
BackP-E, 1979, “Regionalpolitik och beslutsnivå” (Regional policy and level of decision), Department of Politics, University of Umeå, Umeå
4.
BenjaminR, 1977, “Strategy versus methodology in comparative research”Comparative Political Studies9475–483
5.
BergerS, 1985, “‘Upp till kamp’, ‘Hem till byn’, och ‘Starta eget’: Om tendenser och yttringar i samhällsvetenskaplig lokalsamhällesforskning” (Recent trends in social science research on local communities), Geografiska regionstudier 15, Department of Social and Economic Geography, University of Uppsala, Uppsala
6.
BergerS, 1989, “Om plats, region och ytterligare några begrepp” (On place, region and some other concepts) Nordisk Samhällsgeografisk Tidskrift926–34
7.
BlochM, 1953, “Toward a comparative history of European societies”, in Enterprise and Secular Change Eds LaneFCRiemersmaJC (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 494–521
8.
BodinLJohanssonASöderfeldtB, 1984, “Kommunforskningsprojektet i Örebro: Metod och urval” (The communal research project in Örebro: Method and choice of communes), Skriftserien 24, Örebro University, Örebro
9.
Bostadsstyrelsen, 1963, “Att pröva markpriset” (Estimating the land price), Bostadsstyrelsens skrifter 26, Bostadsstyrelsen (National Board of Housing), Stockholm
10.
BoudonR, 1968A Quoi Sert la Notion de ‘Structure’ (Gallimard, Paris)
11.
CastellsM, 1983The City and the Grassroots (University of California Press, Berkeley, USA)
12.
CawsonASaundersP, 1983, “Corporatism, competitive politics and class struggle”, in Capital and Politics Ed. KingR (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, Hants) pp 8–27
13.
CernyPG, 1990The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State (Sage, London)
14.
CockburnC, 1977The Local State (Pluto Press, London)
15.
CookeP, 1989, “Locality theory and the poverty of ‘spatial variation’ (a response to Duncan and Savage)”Antipode21261–73
16.
CrensonM, 1971The Un-politics of Air Pollution (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
17.
DanermarkB, 1983, “Klass, inkomst och boende: Om segregationen i några kommuner” (Class, income and housing: The residential segregation patterns in three communes), Örebro Studies 1, Department of Sociology, Örebro University, Örebro
18.
DanermarkBElanderIStrömbergTSöderfeldtB, 1985, “A success story? Housing policy in three Swedish communes”, RR 85–4, Örebro University, Örebro
19.
DanermarkBJacobsonT, 1989, “Local housing policy and residential segregation”Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research6245–256
20.
DickensPDuncanSGoodwinMGrayF (Eds), 1985States, Localities, and Housing Provision (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
21.
DuncanODDuncanB, 1955, “Residential distribution and occupational stratification”American Journal of Sociology60493–503
22.
DuncanS, 1981, “Housing policy, the methodology of levels, and urban research: The case of Castells”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research5231–253
23.
DuncanS, 1985, “Land policy in Sweden: Separating ownership from development”, in Land Policy, Patterns and Alternatives Eds BarrettSHealeyP (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 308–344
24.
DuncanS, 1987, Book review of A Success Story? Housing Policy in Three Swedish Communes by B Danermark, I Elander, T Strömberg, B Söderfeldt Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research4139–140
25.
DuncanSGoodwinM, 1982, “The local state and restructuring social relations: Theory and practice”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6157–186
26.
DuncanSSavageM, 1989, “Space, scale and locality”Antipode21179–206
27.
DunleavyP, 1980Urban Political Analysis (Macmillan, London)
28.
EgeröB, 1979, En Mönsterstad Granskas: Bostadsplanering i Örebro 1945–1975 (Housing and planning in Örebro 1945–1975), Byggforskningsrådet (Swedish Council for Building Research), Stockholm
29.
ElanderI, 1991, “Good dwellings for all: The case of social rented housing in Sweden”Housing Studies6 forthcoming
30.
ElanderIMontinS, 1990, “Decentralization and control: Central — local government relations in Sweden”Policy and Politics18165–180
31.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
32.
GaventaJ, 1980Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
33.
GiddensA, 1979Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
34.
HeadeyB, 1978Housing Policy in the Developed Economy: The United Kingdom, Sweden and the United States (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants)
35.
HecloHMadsenH, 1987Policy and Politics in Sweden: Principled Pragmatism (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
36.
JacobsHM, 1989, “Localism and land use planning”Journal of Architectural and Planning Research61–18
37.
JohanssonB, 1985, “Dynamics of metropolitan processes and policies”Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research2115–124
38.
JohanssonRKarlbergB, 1979Bostadspolitiken (Housing policy) (Liber, Stockholm)
39.
LaneJ-EMagnussonT, 1987, “Sweden”, in Central and Local Government Relations: A Comparative Analysis of West European Unitary States Eds PageECGoldsmithM (Sage, London) pp 12–28
40.
LijphartA, 1975, “The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research”Comparative Political Studies8158–176
41.
LukesS, 1977Essays in Social Theory (Macmillan, London)
42.
LundénT, 1984, “Svensk kulturgeografisk forskning av regionalpolitisk relevans” (Geographical research in Sweden and regional policy), in Regionalpolitisk Forskning: Två Översikter ERU-rapport 33, Industridepartementet, ERU, Stockholm, pp 9–53
43.
LundmarkMMalmbergA, 1988, “Industrilokalisering i Sverige: Regional och strukturell förändring” (Industrial location in Sweden), Geografiska regionstudier 19, Department of Social and Economic Geography, University of Uppsala, Uppsala
44.
LundqvistLJ, 1987, “Sweden's housing policy and the quest for neutrality”Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research585–100
45.
LundqvistLJElanderIDanermarkB, 1990, “Housing policy in Sweden—still a success story?”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14445–467
46.
MeckstrothT, 1975, “‘Most different systems’ and ‘most similar systems’: A study in the logic of comparative social inquiry”Comparative Political Studies8132–157
47.
MelvinPM (Ed.), 1986American Community Organizations. A Historical Dictionary (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT)
48.
MooreCPierreJ, 1988, “Privatisation or partnership: The political economy of local economic restructuring”Policy and Politics16169–178
49.
MörnerM, 1981, “Komparation: Att vidga historiska perspektiv” (Comparison as a way to broaden the historical perspective) Scandia47225–243
50.
OlssonJ, 1989, “Förhandlingsekonomiska tendenser i den lokala näringspolitiken—exemplet Sverige” (Negotiations in local economic policy—the case of Sweden), in Forhandlingsökonomi i Norden Eds NielsenKPedersenOK (Jurist-og Ökonomforbundets Forlag, Charlottenlund) pp 271–295
51.
ÖsterbergE, 1975, “Rikshistoria och lokalhistoria: En fråga om centrum och periferi, centralt och perifert i historieforskningen?” (National and local history: On centre and periphery in historical research), in Periferi og Centrum i Historien. Studier i Historisk Metode X Eds LangholmSMaursethP (Oslo Universitetsforlag, Tromsö) pp 168–189
52.
ParisC, 1983, “The myth of urban politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space189–108
53.
PopperK, 1972The Logic of Scientific Discovery3rd edition (Hutchinson, London)
54.
PrzeworskiA, 1987, “Methods of cross-national research, 1970–83: An overview”, in Comparative Policy Research. Learning from Experience Eds DierkesMWeilerHNAntalAB (Gower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 31–49
55.
SaundersP, 1980Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
56.
SharpeLJ, 1988, “The growth and decentralisation of the modern democratic state”European Journal of Political Research16365–380
57.
SOU, 1968Statens Offentliga Utredningar (State Commission Reports), number 7 (Allmänna, Stockholm)
58.
SOU, 1974Statens Offentliga Utredningar (State Commission Reports), number 3 (Allmänna, Stockholm)
59.
SOU, 1988Statens Offentliga Utredningar (State Commission Reports), number 38 (Allmänna, Stockholm)
60.
StrömbergLWesterståhlJ, 1984, “The new Swedish communes: A summary of local government research”, RR 1984:1, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
61.
StrömbergT, 1984, “Kommunalsocialismen inför verkligheten” (Municipal socialism and reality), Örebro studies 2, Department of Humanities, Örebro University, Örebro
62.
Swedish Official Statistics, 1975; 1985
63.
ThibergS, 1979a, “Förord” (Foreword), in En Mönsterstad Granskas: Bostadsplanering i Örebro 1945–1975 (Housing and planning in Örebro 1945–1975) B Egerö, Byggforskningsrådet (Swedish Council for Building Research), Stockholm, pp 6–7
64.
ThibergS, 1979b, “Örebro tur och retur” (Örebro both ways)Arkitektur79(6) 14–15
65.
ThriftNJ, 1983, “On the determination of social action in space and time”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space123–57
66.
TörnqvistG, 1963Studier i Industrilokalisering (Studies on industrial location), PhD thesis, published as Statens Offentliga Utredningar (State Commission Reports), number 49 (Allmänna, Stockholm)
67.
TryH, 1988, “Lokal och regional historia” (Local and regional history), in Historia i Belysning. Sex Perspektiv pa Svensk Historisk Forskning Ed. LandbergH UHÄ-rapport 1988:17, Universitets- och Högskoleämbetet (National Board of Universities and Colleges), Uppsala
68.
WardeA, 1989, “Recipes for pudding: A comment on locality”Antipode21274–281
69.
WasteRJ (Ed.), 1986Community Power: Directions for Future Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
