The concept of regulation has become critical to recent debates about the nature of restructuring in geographical and economic contexts. This paper is an exploration of the theoretical implications of viewing regulation as social practice as opposed to economic imperative. Emphasis is placed on French regulation theory and those attempting to reconstruct an understanding of regulation from within a hermeneutic—interpretive framework. By definition, these two approaches represent contrasting points of view. However, the author warns against setting the context of regulation within such oppositional parameters. The commentary is not about providing a definitive approach to regulation, but, rather, is an exploration of the methodological and epistemological issues arising from the divergent approaches to regulation that have emerged in the literature. The author draws heavily on the debate between interpretivists and legal positivists and argues that this domain provides a new and exciting avenue for research on the nature of regulation in the spatial sciences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgliettaM, 1982, “Capitalism in the eighties”New Left Reviewnumber 136, 25–35
2.
AgliettaM, 1987A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (New Left Books, London)
3.
AminA, 1989, “Flexible specialisation and small firms in Italy: Myths and realities”Antipode2113–34
4.
BakanJ CBlomleyN K, 1992, “Spatial boundaries, legal categories and the judicial mapping of the worker”Environment and Planning A24629–644
5.
BernsteinR, 1989Beyond Objectivism and Relativism (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
6.
BonefieldW, 1987, “Reformulation of state theory”Capital and Class3396–127
7.
BoyerR, 1986La théorie de la régulation: Une analyse critique (Éditions la Découverte, Paris)
8.
ClarkG L, 1989, “Law and the interpretive turn in social science”Urban Geography10209–228
9.
ClarkG L, 1990, “Location, management strategy, and workers' pensions”Environment and Planning A2217–37
10.
ClarkG L, 1991a, “Regulating the restructuring of the US steel industry: Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and pension obligations”Regional Studies25135–153
11.
ClarkG L, 1991b, “Limits of statutory responses to corporate restructuring illustrated with reference to plant closing legislation”Economic Geography6722–41
12.
ClarkG L, 1992, “Problematic status of corporate regulation in the United States: Towards a new moral order”Environment and Planning A24705–725
13.
ClarkG L, 1993Pensions and Corporate Restructuring in American Industry: A Crisis of Regulation (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) (forthcoming)
14.
ClarkeS, 1988, “Overaccumulation, class struggle and the regulation approach”Capital and Class3659–92
15.
CookeP, 1992, “Some spatial aspects of regulatory and technological change in telecommunciation industries”Environment and Planning A24683–703
16.
DaintithT (Ed.), 1988Law as an Instrument of Economic Policy: Comparative and Critical Approaches (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin)
17.
DahrendorfR, 1989, “Changing social values under Mrs Thatcher”, in Thatcherism Ed. SkidelskyRBasil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 191–201
18.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
19.
DerridaJ, 1978Writing and Difference (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, Hants)
20.
DworkinR (Ed.), 1986aThe Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
21.
DworkinR, 1986bLaw's Empire (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
EagletonT, 1990The Ideology of the Aesthetic (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
FishS, 1982, “Interpretation and the pluralist vision”Texas Law Review60495–505
25.
FishS, 1989Doing What Comes Naturally (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
26.
FissO, 1982, “Objectivity and interpretation”Stanford Law Review34739–764
27.
FriedmanL, 1985, “On regulation and legal process”, in Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences Ed. NollRUniversity of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 111–136
28.
GiddensA, 1986New Rules of Sociological Method (Hutchinson, London)
29.
HancherLMoranM, 1989, “Organising regulatory space”, in Capitalism, Culture and Economic Regulation Eds HancherLMoranMClarendon Press, Oxford) pp 271–301
30.
HartH, 1961The Concept of Law (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
31.
HarveyD, 1987, “Three myths in search of a reality in urban studies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5365–377
32.
HarveyD, 1990The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
33.
HayI, 1992, “Place, power, and medical liability insurance in the United States”Environment and Planning A24645–661
34.
HirschJ, 1984, “Notes towards a reformulation of state theory”, in Rethinking Marx Eds. HaenninenSPaldanLArgument Verlag, Berlin) pp 43–58
35.
HirstPZeitlinJ, 1988, “Crisis, what crisis?”New Statesmen 18 March, pages 10–12
36.
HirstPZeitlinJ, 1990, “Flexible specialisation vs post-Fordism: Theory, evidence and policy implications”, paper presented to the conference on Pathways to Industrialisation and Regional Development in the 1990s, Arrowhead Lake, CA, 15–17 March; copy available from the authors, Birkbeck College, University of London, London
37.
JessopB, 1988, “Regulation theory, post-Fordism and the state: More than a reply to Werner Bonefeld”Capital and Class34147–168
38.
KelmanM, 1987A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
39.
LakeR WDischL, 1992, “Structural constraints and pluralist contradictions in hazardous waste regulation”Environment and Planning A24663–681
40.
LevinsonS, 1982, “Law as literature”Texas Law Review60373–404
41.
LipietzA, 1985, “Le national et le régional: Quelle autonomie face à le crise capitalise mondiale?”, Couverture Orange 8521, CEPREMAP, Paris)
42.
LipietzA, 1986, “Behind the crisis: The exhaustion of a regime of accumulation: A ‘regulation school’ perspective on some French empirical works”Review of Radical Political Economy1813–33
43.
LipietzA, 1987Mirages and Miracles: The Crisis of Global Fordism (Verso, London)
44.
LyotardJ, 1984The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
45.
MardenP, 1990a, “Flexibility and labour regulation: A suggested interpretation of the determinants of changing work relations”, WP27, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria
46.
MardenP, 1990b, “Modern capitalist society and a theory of regulation: Searching for the elusive Archimedean point”, WP31, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria
47.
MardenP, 1992, “The deconstructionist tendencies of postmodern geographies: A compelling logic?”Progress in Human Geography (forthcoming)
48.
MooreM, 1984, “The need for a theory of legal theories: Assessing pragmatic instrumentalism”Cornell Law Review69988–1046
49.
MooreM, 1985, “A natural law theory of interpretation”South Californian Law Review58277–398
50.
MooreM, 1989, “The interpretive turn in modern theory: A turn for the worse?”Stanford Law Review41871–957
51.
PioreMSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
52.
RabinowPSullivanW (Eds), 1979Interpretive Social Science: A Reader (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
53.
RortyR, 1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
54.
RortyR, 1982Consequences of Pragmaticism (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
55.
RothP, 1987Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A Case for Methodological Pluralism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
56.
ScottA, 1988, “Flexible production systems and regional development: The rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12171–186
57.
SelznickP, 1985, “Focusing organizational research on regulation”, in Regulation and the Social Sciences Ed. NollRUniversity of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 363–369
58.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
59.
StorperMScottA, 1988, “The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes”, in The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Eds WolchJDearMUnwin Hyman, London) pp 21–39
60.
SunsteinC, 1990After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
61.
WhiteJ, 1982, “Law as language”Texas Law Review60415–445
62.
WittgensteinL, 1953Philosophical Investigations translated by AnscombeG E M (Macmillan, New York)
63.
WrightC, 1987Realism, Meaning and Truth (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
