Recent changes in the economic regulation of the for-hire trucking industry in Ontario (Truck Transportation Act, 1988) have provided a new opportunity to investigate the associated impacts of deregulation or regulatory reform. Two main areas of concern are the overall charge rate levels for trucking service and the charge rate levels for shipments involving small remote communities. To investigate these areas of concern, the makeup of shipment revenues before and after the initiation of regulatory reform is analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the variation in intraregional shipment charge rates with respect to commodity type as well as the size and remoteness of the communities involved.
The results of the multivariate analysis indicate that the overall charge rate levels have not declined in the majority of industry sectors examined. With respect to charge rate levels for small communities, the basic question concerns the existence of cross-subsidization. This can occur when carriers, ‘obliged’ to serve remote communities under regulation, subsidize shipments to such areas from revenues earned in busier markets. The analysis of data in this paper provides evidence that cross-subsidization was present in some sectors of the industry but not in others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AthearnFJr, 1991, “Availability of less-than-truckload service since deregulation in the ten states bordering Canada”Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum (University of Saskatchewan Press, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan) pp 69–83
2.
BartlettD LSteeleJ R, 1992America: What Went Wrong (Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City, KA)
3.
BeilockRFreemanJ, 1984, “Deregulated motor carrier service to small communities”Transportation Journal2371–82
4.
BeilockRFreemanJ, 1987, “The effect on rate levels and structures of removing entry and rate controls on motor carriers”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy21167–188
5.
BonsorN C, 1978, “The development of regulation in the highway trucking industry in Ontario”, in Government Regulation: Issues and AlternativesOntario Economic Council, 81 Wellesley Street East, Toronto, Ontario M4Y 1H6, pp 103–133
6.
BonsorN C, 1984Transportation Economics: Theory and Canadian Policy (Butterworth, Toronto)
7.
BoucherM, 1990, “The impact of deregulation on the Quebec trucking industry: A preliminary assessment”Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum (University of Saskatchewan Press, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan) pp 123–133
8.
ChowG, 1982Research Monograph 13. Rate and Cost Analysis of For-hire Trucking: Provincial ComparisonsResearch Branch, Bureau of Competition Policy, Consumer and Corporate Affairs, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OC9
9.
ChowG, 1983, “An evaluation of less-than-truckload transport in small rural communities of western Canada”The Logistics and Transportation Review19225–244
10.
CorsiT MStowersJ R, 1991, “Effects of a deregulated environment on motor carriers: A systematic, multi-segment analysis”Transportation Journal304–28
11.
DelaneyR V, 1992, “The North American scene: A macro-economic view”Transportation Quarterly4619–35
12.
Government of Canada, 1988, “National Transportation Act of 1987”, in Statutes of Canada 1987 volume 1, chapter 34, pp 881–1063 (Queen's Printer for Canada, Ottawa)
13.
Government of the United States, 1980, “Motor Carrier Act of 1980”, in United States Statutes at Large, 96th Congress, 2nd Session volume 94, pp 793–826 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
14.
HarperD VJohnsonJ C, 1987, “The potential consequences of deregulation of transportation revisited”Land Economics63137–146
15.
KahnA E, 1970The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions. Volume 1: Economic Principles (John Wiley, New York)
16.
KaplanH, 1989Policy and Rationality: The Regulation of Canadian Trucking (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
17.
KayJVickersJ, 1990, “Regulatory reform: An appraisal”, in Deregulation or Re-regulation: Regulatory Reform in the U.S. and Europe Ed. MajoneG (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 223–251
18.
KlingR W, 1990, “Deregulation and structural change in the LTL motor freight industry”Transportation Journal2947–53
19.
McMullenB S, 1987, “The impact of regulatory reform on U.S. motor carrier costs”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy21307–319
20.
McRaeJ JPrescottD M, 1982, “Regulation and performance in the Canadian trucking industry”, report 23, Economic Council of Canada (Government of Canada, Ottawa)
21.
MSSC, 1985Freedom to Move: A Framework for Transportation Reform Ministry of Supply and Services Canada (Government of Canada, Ottawa)
22.
OMTC, 1983, “Trucking services to small communities”, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communication, 1201 Wilson Avenue, Downsview, Ontario M3M 1J8
23.
Ontario Governments, 1927, “Public Commercial Vehicles Act of 1927”, in The Revised Statutes of Ontario 1927 volume 3, chapter 253, page 3281 (Ontario Press, Toronto)
24.
Ontario Government, 1989, “Bill 88, The Truck Transportation Act (1988): An act to regulate truck transportation”1st Session, 34th Legislature Ontario (Queens Printer for Ontario, Toronto)
25.
SpadyR HFriedlaenderA F, 1978, “Hedonic cost functions for the regulated trucking industry”The Bell Journal of Economics9159–179
26.
SpulberD S, 1989Regulation and Markets (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
27.
StanburyW T, 1989, “Reforming direct regulation in Canada”, in The Age of Regulatory Reform Eds ButtonK JSwannD (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 49–79
28.
Statistics Canada, 19871986 Census of Canada Ottawa
29.
Statistics Canada, 1988Trucking in Canada 1986Surface and Marine division
30.
Statistics Canada, 1989Trucking in Canada 1987
31.
Statistics Canada, 1990Trucking in Canada 1988
32.
Statistics Canada, 1991Trucking in Canada 1989
33.
SwannD, 1989, “The regulatory scene: An overview”, in The Age of Regulatory Reform Eds ButtonK JSwannD (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 1–27
34.
UttonM A, 1986The Economics of Regulating Industry (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
35.
WatersonM, 1988Regulation of the Firm and Natural Monopoly (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
36.
WoudsmaC GKanaroglouP S, 1992, “Modelling the structure of for-hire motor carrier revenues, by commodity, and community with an example from Ontario under Regulation, 1987”, RR-293, Quantitative Program in Economics and Population, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
37.
YingJ S, 1990, “The inefficiency of regulating a competitive industry: Productivity gains in trucking following reform”The Review of Economics and Statistics72191–201
