One of the most important outcomes of federal reregulation of the financial services sector since 1989 has been the completion of the shift from locally organized flows of credit to the housing sector, to a national mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market. In this paper the way in which the rise of MBSs has reshaped access to credit across social and spatial divisions is examined, and the implications of battles to shape the MBS market and of the practices of the two principal agencies in that market for the geography of financial exclusion are explored. Although the reregulation of the government-sponsored secondary markets promises to help break down entrenched patterns of financial exclusion, the government-sponsored enterprises are placed in the complex position of mediating social demands for more inclusionary credit practices and investor demands for continued high returns and low risks. It is unclear whether reform efforts will be sustained in the new political and economic environment of the mid-1990s.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarthJ RBrumbaughR DJr, 1992, “Turmoil among depository institutions: Implications for the U.S. real estate market”Housing Policy Debate3901–926
2.
BenstonG JKaufmanG C, 1990, “Understanding the savings and loan debacle”The Public Interest99 (Spring) 79–95
3.
BradfordC, 1979, “Financing home ownership—the federal role in neighborhood decline”Urban Affairs Quarterly14313–335
4.
BrattR G, 1989Rebuilding a Low-income Housing Policy (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
5.
BushV, 1992a, “Do tighter standards put the heat on lenders?”Savings InstitutionsCXIII (April) 18–23
BushV, 1994, “Secondary markets and affordable housing”Savings and Community Banker3 (January) 33–38
8.
CampenJ T, 1993, “Banks, communities and public policy”, in Transforming the U.S. Financial System: Equity and Efficiency for the 21st Century Eds DymskiG AEpsteinGPollinR (M E Sharpe, Armonk, NY) pp 221–249
9.
CannerG BPassmoreWSmithD S, 1994, “Residential lending to low-income and minority families: Evidence from the 1992 HMDA data”Federal Reserve Bulletin (February) 79–108
10.
CarronA SBrumbaughR DJr, 1991, “The viability of the thrift industry”Housing Policy Debate2(1) 1–24
11.
CBA, 1992, “Affordable mortgage survey”, Consumer Bankers Association, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, 30th floor, Arlington, VA 22209–3908
12.
CBHUA, 1994, “Government-sponsored Enterprises Interim Housing Goals Performance in 1993”, 103rd Congress, 2nd Session, 13 April, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Senate, US Congress (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
ChristianJ WWilsonM L, 1984, “Capital requirements for housing in the 1980s”Contemporary Policy Issues630–42
15.
ChristophersonS, 1993, “Market rules and territorial outcomes: The case of the United States”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17274–288
16.
CoakleyJ, 1994, “The integration of property and financial markets”Environment and Planning A26696–714
17.
Community Reinvestment Act, 1977, PL 95–128 Title VIII 91 Stat. 1147
18.
CorbridgeSThriftN, 1994, “Money, power and space: Introduction and overview”, in Money Power and Space Eds CorbridgeSMartinRThriftN (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–25
19.
CrenshawA B, 1990, “Proposals target U.S.-backed agencies; administration wants assurances on finances in light of S&L crisis”Washington Post 17 July, section C, page 2
20.
d'AristaJ WSchlesingerT, 1993, “The parallel banking system”, in Transforming the U.S. Financial System: Equity and Efficiency for the 21st Century Eds DymskiG AEpsteinGPollinR (M E Sharpe, Armonk, NY) pp 157–199
21.
DiPasqualeDCummingsJ L, 1992, “Financing multifamily rental housing: The changing role of lenders and investors”Housing Policy Debate377–116
22.
DymskiGVeitchJWhiteM, 1991, “Taking it to the bank: Poverty, race, and credit in Los Angeles”, a report to the City of Los Angeles, copy available from Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, CA
23.
Fair Housing Act, 1988, PL 100–430 102 Stat. 1619
24.
Fannie Mae, 1993, “Housing impact report, 1992–1993”, Federal National Mortgage Association, 3900 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20016
25.
FergusJ TGoodmanJ LJr, 1993, “The 1989–92 credit crunch for real estate: A retrospective”Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association225–32
FishbeinA J, 1992, “The ongoing experiment with ‘regulation from below’: Expanded reporting requirements for HMDA and CRA”Housing Policy Debate3601–636
28.
FloridaR L, 1986, “The political economy of financial deregulation and the reorganization of housing finance in the United States”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research10207–231
29.
FloridaR LFeldmanM M A, 1988, “Housing in US Fordism”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12187–209
30.
Freddie Mac, undated [1993], “Freddie Mac affordable housing initiatives information summary”, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, 8200 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22102
31.
ForsellL D, 1994, “Cash from the capital markets”Mortgage Banking54 (July) 46–55
32.
FRB, various years Domestic Financial Statistics Federal Reserve Board (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
33.
GalsterG C, 1992, “Research on discrimination in housing and mortgage markets: Assessment and future directions”Housing Policy Debate3639–684
34.
GAO, 1990, “Government-sponsored enterprises: The government's exposure to risk”, General Accounting Office, PO Box 6015, Gaithersburg, MD 20884–6015
GranorMSutcliffeP, 1994, “Bending the condo rules”Real Estate Today (February) 39–41
37.
HarneyK R, 1990, “The nation's housing—major lenders turn tough on low-documentation loans”Washington Post 17 March, section E, page 1
38.
HarneyK R, 1993, “The nation's housing—even if you fail this mortgage test, you can still make the grade”Washington Post 19 June, section E, page 3
39.
HillE W, 1993, “The changing role of depository institutions in the mortgage market”, paper presented at the Fannie Mae University Colloquium Series, Wayne State University, 10 February; mimeograph available from the author, Department of Urban Studies, Cleveland State University Cleveland, OH
40.
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, 1975, PL 94–200 Title III 89 Stat. 1125
41.
Housing and Community Development Act, 1992, PL 102–550 106 Stat. 3672
42.
HR, 1992, “Housing and Community Development Act of 1992”, 102nd Congress, 2nd Session, 5 October, House of Representatives, US Congress (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
43.
HUD, 1992a, “1991 Report to Congress on the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation”, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, PO Box 6091, Rockville, MD 20850
44.
HUD, 1992b, “1991 Report to Congress on the Federal National Mortgage Association”, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, PO Box 6091, Rockville, MD 20850
45.
ICF, 1991, “The secondary market and community lending through lenders' eyes”, report to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation by ICF Inc.; copy available from ICF Inc., 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031
46.
JCHS, 1993, “State of the nation's housing 1993”, Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
47.
KaneE J, 1984, “Change and progress in contemporary mortgage markets”Housing Finance Review3257–282
48.
KnightJ, 1993, “Fannie Mae is criticized as it reports profit gain”Washington Post 13 July, section D, page 1
49.
KushnerJ A, 1992, “Federal enforcement and judicial review of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988”Housing Policy Debate3537–600
50.
KyriakosM, 1993, “Renters create roadblocks to condo loans; condo owners face problems refinancing”Washington Post 10 July, section E, page 1
51.
LeaM J, 1990, “Housing and the capital markets”, in Building Foundations: Housing and Federal Policy Eds DiPasqualeDKeyesL C (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 187–208
52.
LehmanH J, 1990a, “Freddie Mac bans buying of risky mortgage loans; rules tighten low-down-payment lending”Washington Post 15 December, section F, page 1
53.
LehmanH J, 1990b, “New risk test studied for secondary lenders; lawmakers worry about financial cleanup”Washington Post 7 July, section E, page 1
54.
LehmanH J, 1991, “Fed finds wider low-income gap; Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac programs fall short, analysis shows”Washington Post 2 November, section F, page 1
55.
LeyshonAThriftN, 1993, “The restructuring of the U.K. financial services industry in the 1990s: A reversal of fortune?”Journal of Rural Studies9223–241
56.
LeyshonAThriftN, 1994, “Access to financial services and financial infrastructure withdrawal: Problems and policies”Area26268–275
57.
LiefB JGoeringS, 1987, “The implementation of the federal mandate for fair housing”, in Divided Neighborhoods: Changing Patterns of Racial Segregation Ed. TobinG A (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 227–267
58.
LitanR E, 1991The Revolution in U.S. Finance (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
59.
MacDonaldH, 1992, “Special interest politics and the crisis of financial institutions in the USA”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy10123–146
60.
MacDonaldH, 1995, “Secondary mortgage markets and federal housing policy”Journal of Urban Affairs17(1) 53–79
61.
MasseyDCondranGDentonN, 1987, “The effect of residential segregation on black social and economic well-being”Social Forces6629–56
62.
OrfieldG, 1988, “Race and the liberal agenda: The loss of the integrationist dream, 1965–1974”, in The Politics of Social Policy in the United States Eds WeirMOrloffShola ASkocpolT (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 313–356
63.
ParzingerT M, 1992, “The long-term impact of FIRREA on real estate finance”Real Estate Review2055–59
64.
PearlsteinSKnightJ, 1993, “Banks lose out as depositors go elsewhere; many options available for saving, borrowing, investing”Washington Post 22 August, section A, page 1
65.
PizzoSFrickerMMuoloP, 1991Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans (Harper Collins, New York)
66.
SalmonJ L, 1991, “Mortgage buyer targets ‘teaser’ ARMs; Fannie Mae tightens eligibility standards; Freddie Mac may follow”Washington Post 28 December, section E, page 3
67.
SCCI, 1993, “Existing efforts to end the crisis: A report card”, 103rd Congress, 1st Session, 18 February, Subcommittee on Consumer Credit and Insurance, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, US Congress (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
68.
SchmidtS, 1992, “RTC's packaging of S&Ls' assets raises questions; securities benefit investors, not taxpayers, critics say”Washington Post 12 November, section A, page 1
69.
SCRA, 1991, “Secondary mortgage markets and redlining”, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, 28 February, Subcommittee on Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Senate, US Congress (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
70.
SHCD, 1991a, “Treasury, CBO and GAO reports on FNMA, FHLMC and the Federal Home Loan Bank system”, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, 15 May and 29 May, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, US Congress (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
71.
SHCD, 1991b, “Government-Sponsored Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1991”, 102nd Congress, 1st Session, 18 July and 19 July
72.
SHCD, 1992, “Multifamily housing finance and production”, 102nd Congress, 2nd Session, 23 July
