The San Francisco Bay Area has taken on a distinct polycentric metropolitan form, with three tiers of hierarchical employment centers encircling downtown San Francisco, the region's primary center. In this paper it is found that polycentric development is associated with differentials in suburban and urban commute trip times: commute trips made by employees of suburban centers are shorter in duration than commute trips made by their counterparts in larger and denser urban centers. Differentials were even greater, however, with respect to commuting modal splits. Lower density, outlying employment centers averaged far higher rates of drive-alone automobile commuting and insignificant levels of transit commuting. Smaller, outlying centers were also the least self-contained, with a large number averaging twenty or more times as many external as internal commutes. The effects of housing availability and prices on the residential locational choices of those working both in urban and in suburban employment centers are also investigated in this paper. Locational choices are stratified by occupational class and type of center. High housing prices in and around employment centers were found to displace workers to residences in other subregions, except in the case of professional workers in fast-growing, outlying centers. These workers were attracted to higher-priced nearby housing. In the empirical analysis, significant segmentation in housing choices among workers in fast-growing suburban centers was found. This could be partly due to selective land-use policies implemented by local governments in these areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
ARC, 1985, “Transportation problems and strategies for major activity centers in the Atlanta Region”, Atlanta Regional Commission, 3715 Northside Park, 200 North Creek, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30327
3.
BaerwaldT, 1982, “Land use changes in suburban clusters and corridors”Transportation Research Board number 861, 7–12
4.
BellD, 1991, “Office location: city or suburbs?”Transportation18239–259
5.
BookoutL, 1992, “Neotraditional town planning: cars, pedestrians, and transit”Urban Land51(2) 10–15
6.
CerveroR, 1986, “Transit in Canada: innovation and integration at its best”Transportation Quarterly14305–322
7.
CerveroR, 1989aAmerica's Suburban Centers: The Land Use—Transportation Link (Unwin Hyman, Winchester, MA)
8.
CerveroR, 1989b, “Jobs-housing balancing and regional mobility”Journal of the American Planning Association55136–150
9.
CerveroR, 1995, “Changing live—work spatial relationships: implications for metropolitan structure and mobility”, in Cities in Competition: The Emergence of Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century Eds BrotchieJNewtonPHallPBattyMBlakeleyE (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne) pp 330–347
10.
CerveroRLandisJ, 1992, “Suburbanization of jobs and the journey to work: a submarket analysis of commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area”Journal of Advanced Transportation26275–297
11.
ClarkWBurtJ, 1980, “The impact of workplace on residential location”Annals of the Association of American Geographers70(1) 59–67
12.
DanielsP, 1972, “Transport changes generated by decentralized offices”Regional Studies6273–289
13.
DanielsP, 1981, “Transport changes generated by decentralized offices: a second survey”Regional Studies15507–520
14.
DekaD, 1990, “Employment and residential location patterns in the Ottawa—Hull Region: 1971–86”, Masters thesis, School of Urban Planning, McGill University, Montreal
15.
DownsA, 1992Stuck in Traffic: Coping with Peak-hour Traffic Congestion (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
16.
DownsA, 1994New Visions for Metropolitan America (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
17.
DubinR, 1991, “Commuting patterns and firm decentralization”Land Economics67(1) 15–29
18.
DunphyR, 1982, “Defining regional employment centers in an urban area”Transportation Research Record number 861, 13–15
19.
EllwoodD, 1986, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: are there teenage jobs missing in the ghetto?”, in Black Youth Employment Crisis Eds FreemanRHolzerH (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 147–190
20.
FultonW, 1987, “Boundary fights lead to tax-sharing debate”California Planning and Development Report2(9) 1–5
21.
FultonW, 1991Guide to California Planning (Solano Press, Point Arena, CA)
22.
GarreauJ, 1991Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York)
23.
GiulianoG, 1992, “Is jobs—housing balance a transportation issue?”Transportation Research Board number 1305, 305–312
24.
GiulianoGSmallK, 1991, “Subcenters in the Los Angeles Region”Regional Science and Urban Economics21163–182
25.
GiulianoGSmallK, 1993, “Is the journey to work explained by urban structure?”Urban Studies301485–1500
26.
GordonPRichardsonH WJunM, 1991, “The commuting paradox: evidence from the top twenty”Journal of the American Planning Association57416–420
27.
GordonPRichardsonH WWongH L, 1986, “The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles”Environment and Planning A18161–173
28.
GuestACluettC, 1976, “Workplace and residential location: a push-pull model”Journal of Regional Science16399–410
29.
HamiltonB, 1982, “Wasteful commuting”Journal of Political Economy901035–1053
30.
HamiltonERabinovitzFAlschulerJSilvernP, 1991, “Applying the jobs/housing balance concept”Urban Land50(10) 15–18
31.
HartshornTMullerP, 1992, “Suburban business centers: employment indications”, US Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Washington, DC
32.
HeikkilaEDale-JohnsonDGordonPKimJPeiserRRichardsonH, 1989, “What happened to the CBD-distance gradient?: land values in a polycentric city”Environment and Planning A21221–232
33.
House Bill 3133, “An Act relating to property tax exemptions for multiple-unit rental housing”, 68th Oregon Legislative Assembly
34.
HuPYoungJ, 1992, “Summary of travel trends: 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
35.
HughesM, 1992, “Employment decentralization and accessibility: a strategy for stimulating regional mobility”Journal of the American Planning Association57288–299
36.
HumphreyT, 1990, “Suburban congestion: recommendations for transportation and land use responses”Transportation16221–240
37.
IhlanfeldtKSjoquistD, 1991, “The role of space in determining the occupations of black and white workers”Regional Science and Urban Economics21295–315
38.
KainJ, 1993, “The spatial mismatch hypothesis: three decades later”Housing Policy Debate3371–460
39.
KanafaniA, 1983Transportation Demand Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York)
40.
LandisJ, 1986, “Land regulation and the price of new housing: lessons from three California cities”Journal of the American Planning Association529–21
41.
LevinsonDKumarA, 1994, “The rational locator: why travel times have remained stable”Journal of the American Planning Association60319–332
42.
LeyD, 1985, “Work-residence relationships for head office employees in an inflating housing market”Urban Studies22(1) 21–38
43.
McDonaldJ F, 1987, “The identification of urban employment subcenters”Journal of Urban Economics21242–258
44.
McDonaldJ FMcMillenD P, 1990, “Employment subcenters and land values in a polycentric urban area: the case of Chicago”Environment and Planning A221561–1574
45.
McDonaldJ FPratherP, 1994, “Suburban employment centers: the case of Chicago”Urban Studies31201–218
46.
MTC, 1993, “The journey-to-work in the San Francisco Bay Area”, WP-5, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, CA
47.
MuthR F, 1969Cities and Housing (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
48.
O'ConnorK, 1980, “The analysis of journey to work patterns in human geography”Progress in Human Geography4477–499
49.
OlenickTChengS, 1994, “Land development regulations: roadblock to affordable housing”Journal of Urban Planning and Development120(1) 22–27
50.
PivoG, 1990, “The net of beads: suburban office development in six metropolitan areas”Journal of the American Planning Association56457–469
51.
PollakowskiHWachterS, 1990, “The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices”Land Economics66315–324
52.
PucherJ, 1994, “Canadian public transport: recent developments and comparisons with the United States”Transportation Quarterly48(1) 65–78
53.
QuigleyJWeinbergD, 1977, “Intraurban residential mobility: a review and synthesis”International Regional Science Review141–66
54.
ReschovskyAKnaffE, 1977, “Tax-base sharing: an assessment of the Minnesota experience”Journal of the American Institute of Planners43361–370
55.
Rice Center, 1987, “Houston's major activity centers and worker travel behavior”, Rice Joint Center for Urban Mobility Research, Houston, TX
56.
RollestonB, 1987, “Determinants of restrictive suburban zoning: an empirical analysis”Journal of Urban Economics211–21
57.
RosettiMEversoleB, 1993, “Journey to work trends in the United States and its major metropolitan areas”, John A Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA
58.
ScottA, 1988Metropolis: From Division of Labor to Urban Form (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
59.
SimpsonW, 1987, “Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting”Urban Studies24119–128
60.
SmallKSongS, 1992, ‘“Wasteful’ commuting: a resolution”Journal of Political Economy100888–898
61.
SongS, 1994, “Modelling worker residence distribution in the Los Angeles region”Urban Studies311533–1544
62.
SpeareA, 1994, “Changes in urban growth patterns: 1980–90”, policy paper series, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
63.
SuhS, 1990, “Wasteful commuting: an alternative approach”Journal of Urban Economics28277–286
64.
ThomasR, 1969London's New Towns: A Study of Self contained and Balanced Communities (PEP, London)
65.
WabeJ, 1967, “Dispersal of employment and the journey to work”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy1345–361
66.
WachsMTaylorBLevineNOngP, 1993, “The change commute: a case-study of the jobs—housing relationship over time”Urban Studies301711–1729
67.
WhiteM, 1988, “Urban commuting journeys are not ‘wasteful’”Journal of Political Economy961097–1110
68.
WilsonA G, 1967, “A statistical theory of spatial distribution modes”Transportation Research9167–179
69.
WindsorD, 1979Fiscal Zoning in Suburban Communities (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
70.
WuK L, 1994, “A study of the spatial relationship between jobs and housing in the San Francisco Bay Area in 1990: improving the jobs—housing balance to improve regional mobility”, master's thesis, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, CA
71.
ZaxJ, 1990, “Race and commutes”Journal of Urban Economics28336–348
