Earlier economic models of city size have either focused on urban agglomeration effects while ignoring the spatial structure of the rural hinterland, or made unrealistic assumptions (for example, uniform rural population distribution) so as to simplify the problem. Following the classic von Thünen framework, we present a two-sector spatial equilibrium model of a city located at the center of an agricultural hinterland. The city produces industrial goods, and the rural area produces agricultural goods. Both goods are consumed both by urban and by rural residents. Market equilibrium for these goods determines: (1) the spatial size of the region, (2) the urbanization ratio (urban to total population) and the population size of the city, and (3) the rural spatial structure (wage, population distribution, land rent, and agricultural yield). Given various sets of exogenous parameters pertaining to the industrial, agricultural, and transportation production functions and to population preferences, the model is solved numerically, and response functions are estimated and analyzed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abdel-RahmanH M, 1988, “Product differentiation, monopolistic competition and city size”Regional Science and Urban Economics1869–86
2.
Abdel-RahmanH MFujitaM, 1993, “Specialization and diversification in a system of cities”Journal of Urban Economics33189–222
3.
AlperovichG, 1982a, “Capital-labor substitution and city hierarchies”Annals of Regional Science1657–63
4.
AlperovichG, 1982b, “Scale economies and diseconomies in the determination of city size distribution”Journal of Urban Economics12202–213
5.
ArnottR, 1979, “Optimal city size in a spatial economy”Journal of Urban Economics665–89
6.
ArnottRStiglitzJ, 1979, “Aggregate land rents, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size”Quarterly Journal of Economics93471–500
7.
BeckmannM J, 1958, “City hierarchies and the distribution of city size”Economic Development and Cultural Change6243–248
8.
BeckmannM J, 1971, “Von Thünen revisited: a neoclassical land use model”Swedish Journal of Economics741–7
9.
BeckmannM JMcPhersonJ C, 1970, “City size distribution in a central place hierarchy: an alternative approach”Journal of Regional Science1025–33
10.
BeguinH, 1984, “The shape of city-size distributions in a central place system”Environment and Planning A16749–758
11.
CalemP SCarlinoG A, 1991, “Urban agglomeration economies in the presence of technical change”Journal of Urban Economics2982–95
12.
ChipmanJ S, 1970, “External economies of scale and competitive equilibrium”Quarterly Journal of Economics84347–385
13.
CromleyR GHaninkD M, 1989, “A financial-economic von Thünen model”Environment and Planning A21951–960
14.
FischO, 1974, “Impact analysis on optimal urban densities and optimal city size”Journal of Regional Science14233–246
15.
FischO, 1976, “Optimal city size, land tenure and the economic theory of clubs”Regional Science and Urban Economics633–44
16.
FogartyM SGarofaloG A, 1988, “Urban spatial structure and productivity growth in the manufacturing sector of cities”Journal of Urban Economics2360–70
17.
FujitaM, 1989Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
18.
HendersonJ V, 1974, “The sizes and types of cities”American Economic Review64640–656
19.
HendersonJ V, 1977a, “Externalities in a spatial context: the case of air pollution”Journal of Public Economics789–110
20.
HendersonJ V, 1977bEconomic Theory and the Cities (Academic Press, New York)
21.
HendersonJ V, 1986, “Efficiency of resource usage and city size”Journal of Urban Economics1947–70
22.
HendersonJ V, 1987, “System of cities and inter-city trade”, in System of Cities and Facility Location Eds HansePLabbéMPetersDThisseJ-FHendersonJ V (Harwood Academic, New York) pp 71–119
23.
HochmanO, 1981, “Land rents, optimal taxation, and local fiscal independence in an economy with local public goods”Journal of Public Economics1159–85
24.
KanemotoY, 1980Theories of Urban Externalities (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
25.
KanemotoY, 1990, “Optimal cities with indivisibility in production and interactions between firms”Journal of Urban Economics2746–59
26.
KellermanA, 1989a, “Agricultural location theory 1: basic models”Environment and Planning A211381–1396
27.
KellermanA, 1989b, “Agricultural location theory 2: relaxation of assumptions and applications”Environment and Planning A211427–1446
28.
KimS, 1991, “Heterogeneity of labor markets and city size in an open spatial economy”Regional Science and Urban Economics21109–126
29.
KrugmanP, 1993a, “First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location”Journal of Regional Science33129–144
30.
KrugmanP, 1993b, “Economic geography: on the number and location of cities”European Economic Review37293–298
31.
KuboY, 1986, “Urban concentration and rural growth: a two-sector analysis”Journal of Regional Science33579–593
32.
MansfieldE, 1982Microeconomics: Theory and Applications4th edition (W W Norton, New York)
33.
MillsE S, 1967, “Transportation and patterns of urban development: an aggregative model for resource allocation in a metropolitan area”American Economic Review57197–210
34.
MillsE Sde FerrantiD M, 1971, “Market choices and optimum city size”American Economic Review61340–345
35.
MirrleesJ A, 1972, “The optimal town”Swedish Journal of Economics74114–135
36.
MohanR, 1984, “The effect of population growth, the pattern of demand and of technology on the process of urbanization”Journal of Urban Economics15125–156
37.
MulliganG F, 1981, “Production functions, export base multipliers, and urbanization ratios in city systems”Papers of the Regional Science Association4877–88
38.
MulliganG F, 1982, “Tinbergen-type central place systems”International Regional Science Review783–91
39.
MulliganG F, 1983, “Central place populations: a microeconomic consideration”Journal of Regional Science2383–92
40.
MuthR F, 1961, “Economic change and rural—urban land conversions”Econometrica291–23
41.
PengS K, 1991, “City type, city size, trade patterns, and interurban transport costs in a spatial economy”Environment and Planning A231639–1652
42.
RicardoD, 1951On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation Ed. SraffaP (J M Dent, London)
43.
SheshinskiE, 1973, “Congestion and the optimal city size”American Economic Review6261–66
44.
ShiehY-N, 1992, “Launhardt on von Thünen's rings: a note”Regional Science and Urban Economics22637–641
45.
TaylorC A, 1986, “Spatial utility equilibrium and city size distribution in a central place system”Journal of Urban Economics191–22
46.
UptonC, 1981, “An equilibrium model of city size”Journal of Urban Economics1015–36
47.
von ThünenJ H, 1966Von Thünen's State translated by WartenbergC M, Ed. HallP (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
48.
WeberM J, 1973, “Equilibrium of location in an isolated state”Environment and Planning A5751–759
