The antagonism of neoliberalism to local intervention raises questions over the future of planning theory and practice. Recent reviews suggest planning's response to regulatory reform has been to become more flexible, although this may simply reflect nothing more than instrumental pragmatism. Drawing on regulation theory in this paper I review the reforms which have taken place in New Zealand since 1984, when New Zealand moved sharply from a form of regulation described as ‘peripheral Fordism’. Planning after Fordism risks being confined to mediating environmental relations, despite the likelihood of far-reaching social conflict and economic contradictions in the emergent form of capitalism. Two choices face planning in New Zealand; adapt to the mandate of environmental management or extend planning to confront other (social and economic) challenges in the emergent form of capitalism. The second alternative requires planners to adopt a more active and critical role than has been evident to date.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmbroseP, 1986Whatever Happened to Planning? (Methuen, London)
2.
AmbroseP, 1994Urban Process and Power (Routledge, London)
3.
AminAThomasD, 1996, “The negotiated economy: State and civic institutions in Denmark”Economy and Society25255–281
4.
BostonJMartinJPallotJWalshP (Eds), 1989Reshaping the State: New Zealand's Bureaucratic Revolution (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
5.
BrashD, 1996, “New Zealand's remarkable reforms”, Fifth Annual Hayek Memorial Lecture, Institute of Economic Affairs, London
6.
BrindleyTRydinYStokerG, 1989Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the Thatcher Years (Unwin Hyman, London)
7.
BrittonSLe HeronRPawsonE, 1992Changing Places in New Zealand: A Geography of RestructuringNew Zealand Geographical Society, Department of Geography, University of Canterbury, Christchurch
8.
BuhrsTBartlettR V, 1993Environmental Policy in New Zealand Oxford Readings in New Zealand Politics (Oxford University Press, Auckland)
9.
BurtonLCocklinC, 1996, “Water resource management and environmental policy reform in New Zealand: Regionalism, allocation and indigenous relations”Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy7(2) 75–106
10.
BushG, 1995Local Government and Politics in New Zealandsecond edition (Auckland University Press, Auckland)
11.
ClarkG, 1992, “‘Real’ regulation: The administrative state”Environment and Planning A24615–627
12.
CocklinC, 1996, “The Resource Management Act: Issues of interpretation and meaning”, working paper, Department of Geography, University of Auckland, New Zealand
13.
CocklinCFursethO J, 1994, “Geographical dimensions of environmental restructuring in New Zealand”Professional Geographer46459–467
14.
DixonJMontzB, 1995, “From concept to practice: Implementing cumulative impact assessment in New Zealand”Environmental Management19445–456
15.
DormerA, 1994The Resource Management Act 1991: The Transition and BusinessThe New Zealand Business Roundtable, Box 10–147, The Terrace, Wellington
16.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
17.
ForesterJ, 1993Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice (State University of New York Press, New York)
18.
FriedmannJ, 1993, “Toward a non-Euclidean mode of planning”Journal of the American Planning Association59482–484
19.
GambleA, 1988The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism (Macmillan Education, London)
20.
YehGar-On A, 1993, “Urban development of Hong Kong in the 21st century: Opportunities and challenges”, in Pacific Asia in the 21st Century: Geographical and Developmental Perspectives Ed. YeungY (The Chinese University Press, Hong Kong) pp 69–103
21.
GleesonB J, 1995, “The commodification of resource consent in New Zealand”New Zealand Geographer5142–48
22.
GoodchildB, 1990, “Planning and the modern/postmodern debate”Town Planning Review61119–137
23.
GrundyK, 1994, “Section 5: In search of logic”Planning Quarterly Journal of the New Zealand Planning Institute11622–25
HayC, 1995, “Restating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local state”Economy and Society24387–407
26.
HealeyP, 1992, “The reorganisation of state and market in planning”Urban Studies29411–434
27.
HintonSHutchingsJ, 1994, “Regional councils debate responsibilities”Planning Quarterly Journal of the New Zealand Planning Institute1154–6
28.
HolmesF, 1976New Zealand at the Turning Point Report of the Task Force on Economic and Social Planning, to the Minister of National Development, Parliament House, Wellington
29.
JessonB, 1989Fragments of Labour (Penguin Books, Auckland)
30.
JessopB, 1990State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA)
31.
JessopB, 1995, “The regulation approach and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change?”Economy and Society24307–333
32.
KelseyJ, 1995The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment? (Auckland University Press, Auckland)
33.
Le HeronR, 1993Globalized Agriculture (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
34.
Le HeronRPawsonE, 1996Changing Places: New Zealand in the Nineties (Longman Paul, Auckland)
35.
LowN P, 1994, “Growth machines and regulation theory: The institutional dimension of the regulation of space in Australia”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18451–469
36.
McDermottP, 1995, “Resource and environmental management: Still in transition”Planning Quarterly1163–5
37.
McDermottPForgieVHowellR (Eds), 1996, “An agenda for local government: Proceedings from the new local government conference”, Occasional Papers in Local Government Studies 2, Massey University, Palmerston North
38.
McKinlayP, 1990Redistribution of Power? Devolution in New Zealand (Victoria University Press for the Institute of Policy Studies, Wellington)
39.
McLoughlinB, 1994, “Centre or periphery? Town planning and spatial political economy”Environment and Planning A261111–1122
40.
MemonP A, 1991, “Shaking off a colonial legacy in town and country planning in New Zealand, 1870s to 1980s”Planning Perspectives619–32
41.
MemonP A, 1993Keeping New Zealand Green: Recent Environmental Reforms (University of Otago Press, Otago)
42.
MemonP AGleesonB J, 1995, “Towards a new planning paradigm? Reflection on New Zealand's Resource Management Act”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design22109–124
43.
National Development Act1979 (New Zealand Government, Wellington)
44.
O'BrienMWilkesC, 1993The Tragedy of the Market (Dunmore Press, Palmerston North)
45.
PainterJGoodwinM, 1995, “Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation”Economy and Society24334–356
46.
PhilpottB, 1971, “Productivity, economic growth and the national development conference”, Project on Economic Planning Occasional Paper, Victoria University, Wellington
47.
PioreMSabelC F, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
48.
ReadeE, 1987British Town and Country Planning (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks)
49.
Resource Management Act1991 (New Zealand Government, Wellington)
50.
RoweisS T, 1983, “Urban planning as professional mediation of territorial politics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1139–162
51.
ScottGBushnellPSalleeN, 1990, “Reform of the core public sector: The New Zealand experience”Public Sector13(3) 11–24
52.
TeitzM, 1996, “American planning in the 1990s: Evolution, debate and challenge”Urban Studies33649–471
53.
Town and Country Planning Act1977 (New Zealand Government, Wellington)
54.
Treasury, 1984Economic Management Briefing Papers to Incoming Government, New Zealand Treasury, 1 The Terrace, Box 3724, Wellington
55.
UptonS, 1994, “The Resource Management Act. Section 5: Sustainable management of natural and physical resources”, Minister's Address to the Resource Management Law Association Conference, Ministry for the Environment, Box 10–362, Wellington
