Research on migration decisionmaking has been centered on the notion that residential satisfaction and mobility intentions are intervening variables which fully mediate the effects of structural factors on moving behavior. Results from empirical studies, however, have rendered only modest support for this view. The author examines the role of residential satisfaction and mobility intentions vis-à-vis structural variables in migration decisionmaking with the aid of data drawn from the 1985–1989 waves of the American Housing Survey. A conceptual model is derived which is based on behavioral theories developed in social psychology, namely the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Several previously ignored links among structural variables, mobility predispositions, and moving behavior are incorporated. Empirical analyses show that, although satisfaction and intentions are important predictors of mobility, most of the structural variables that are commonly known to be related to migration also have direct effects on subsequent moving behavior, independent of satisfaction and intentions. The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior provide a theoretical framework for a better understanding of the complex relationships between structural variables, residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI, 1985, “From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior”, in Action Control Eds KuhlJBeckmannJ, (Springer, Berlin) pp 11–39
2.
AjzenI, 1988Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL)
3.
AjzenI, 1991, “The intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50179–211
4.
AjzenIFishbeinM, 1980Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
5.
AjzenIMaddenTJ, 1986, “Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology22453–474
6.
BachRLSmithJ, 1977, “Community satisfaction, expectations of moving, and migration”Demography14147–167
7.
BeckLAjzenI, 1991, “Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior”Journal of Research in Personality25285–301
8.
Ben-AkivaMLermanSR, 1985Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
BoC, 1991American Housing Survey (CD-ROM), US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Washington, DC
10.
BrownLALongbrakeDB, 1970, “Migration flows in intra-urban space: Place utility considerations”Annals of the Association of American Geographers60368–384
11.
BrownLAMooreEG, 1970, “The intra-urban migration process: A perspective”Geografiska Annaler Series B531–13
12.
BrownLAHortonFEWittickRI, 1970, “On place utility and the normative allocation of intra-urban migrants”Demography7175–183
13.
CadwalladerM, 1989a, “A conceptual framework for analysing migration behavior in the developed world”Progress in Human Geography13494–511
14.
CadwalladerM, 1989b, “A synthesis of macro and micro approaches to explaining migration: Evidence from inter-state migration in the United States”Geografiska Annaler71B85–94
15.
CadwalladerM, 1992Migration and Residential Mobility: Macro and Micro Approaches (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
16.
ChaikenSStangorC, 1987, “Attitudes and attitude change”Annual Review of Psychology44117–154
17.
ClarkWAVOnakaJL, 1983, “Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility”Urban Studies2047–57
18.
ClarkWAVOnakaJL, 1985, “An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice”Environment and Planning A17915–930
19.
ClarkWAVHuffJOBurtJE, 1979, “Calibrating a model of the decision to move”Environment and Planning A11689–704
20.
DaviesRBCrouchleyR, 1984, “Calibrating longitudinal models of residential mobility and migration”Regional Science and Urban Economics4231–247
21.
DeaneGD, 1990, “Mobility and adjustments: Paths to the resolution of residential stress”Demography2765–79
22.
De JongGF, 1994, “Choice process in migration intentions and behavior”, WP 95-04, Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
23.
De JongGFFawcettJT, 1981, “Motivations for migration: An assessment and a value-expectancy research model”, in Migration Decision-Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries Eds De JongGFGardnerRW, (Pergamon Press, New York) pp 13–58
24.
De JongGFGardnerRW, (Eds), 1981Migration Decision-making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries (Pergamon Press, New York)
25.
De JongGFWilmothJMAngelJLCornwellGT, 1992, “Geographic mobility of the very old: Motives and explanations”, WP 1992-10, Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
26.
DesbaratsJ, 1983, “Spatial choice and constraints on behavior”Annals of the Association of American Geographers73340–357
27.
FishbeinMAjzenI, 1975Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
28.
FishbeinMAjzenI, 1981, “Attitudes and voting behavior: An application of the theory of reasoned action”, in Progress in Applied Social Psychology, Volume 1 Eds StephensonGMDavisJM, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 253–313
29.
GodinG, 1993, “The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: Overview of findings emerging from research problems and usefulness for exercise promotion”Journal of Applied Sport Psychology5141–157
30.
GolantSM, 1982, “Individual differences underlying the dwelling satisfaction of the elderly”Journal of Social Issues38121–133
HaddenLLegerM, 1990Codebook for the American Housing Survey (Abt Associates Inc., Cambridge, MA)
33.
HarrisonWThompsonVDRodgersJL, 1985, “Robustness and sufficiency of the theory of reasoned action in longitudinal prediction”Basic and Applied Psychology625–40
34.
HuffJOClarkWAV, 1978, “Cumulative stress and cumulative inertia: A behavioral model of the decision to move”Environment and Planning A101101–1119
35.
KingGW, 1975, “An analysis of attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of intentions and behavior”Speech Monographs42237–244
36.
LandaleN. S.GuestAM, 1985, “Constraints, satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered”Demography22199–222
37.
LeeBA, 1978, “Residential mobility on skid row: Disaffiliation, powerlessness, and decisionmaking”Demography15285–300
38.
LeeBAOropesaRSKananJW, 1994, “Neighborhood context and residential mobility”Demography31249–270
39.
McFaddenD, 1974, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior”, in Frontiers in Econometrics Ed. ZarembkaP, (Academic Press, New York) pp 105–142
40.
McHughKE, 1984, “Explaining migration intentions and destination selection”Professional Geographer36315–325
41.
McHughKEGoberPReidN, 1990, “Determinants of short- and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters”Demography2781–95
42.
MaddenTJEllenPSAjzenI, 1992, “A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin183–9
43.
ManskiCFMcFaddenD, 1981, “Alternative estimators and samples designs for discrete choice analysis”, in Structural Analysis of Discrete Data Eds ManskiCFMcFaddenD, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
44.
MichelsonW, 1977Environmental Choice, Human Behavior and Residential Satisfaction (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
45.
MooreEG, 1986, “Mobility intention and subsequent relocation”Urban Geography7497–514
46.
NewmanSJDuncanGJ, 1979, “Residential problems, dissatisfaction, and mobility”Journal of the American Planning Association45154–166
47.
OlsonJM, 1993, “Attitudes and attitude change”Annual Review of Psychology44117–154
48.
OnakaJClarkWAV, 1983, “A disaggregate model of residential mobility and housing choice”Geographical Analysis15287–304
49.
RossiP, 1955Why Families Move: A Study of the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility (The Free Press, New York)
50.
RossiPH, 1980, “Introduction to the second edition”, in Why Families Move2nd edition (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 15–50
51.
SchifferDBAjzenI, 1985, “Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49843–851
52.
SellRRDe JongGF, 1983, “Deciding whether to move: Mobility, wishful thinking and adjustment”Sociology and Social Research67146–165
53.
SpeareAJr, 1974, “Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility”Demography11173–188
54.
SpeareAJrGoldsteinSFreyWH, 1975Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA)
55.
SpeareAJrKobrinFKingkadeW, 1982, “The influence of socioeconomic bonds and satisfaction on interstate migration”Social Forces61551–574
56.
TesserAShafferDR, 1990, “Attitudes and attitude change”Annual Review of Psychology41479–523
57.
Vinokur-KaplanD, 1978, “To have—or not to have—another child: Family planning attitudes, intentions, and behavior”Progress in Applied Social Psychology829–46
58.
WaldorfB, 1994, “Assimilation and attachment in the context of international migration”Papers in Regional Science73241–266
59.
WolpertJ, 1965, “Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate”Papers of the Regional Science Association15159–169
60.
WolpertJ, 1966, “Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress”Journal of Social Issues2291–102
