This paper gives the first systematic statistical assessment of the factors explaining the membership of sector business associations. An important aspect of the argument is the importance of differentiating associations by the types of their members because this reflects their demand orientation and their decisionmaking structures. Associations of companies (traditionally termed trade associations), individuals (traditionally termed professional associations), owner-managers, mixed member types, and federations are each different types of member bodies. The estimates in the paper, using new survey evidence, confirm the significance of these distinctions and demonstrate the different factors explaining association membership size, density of encompassing of members (as a proportion of the number of businesses in their sector, and the proportion of the sector's turnover), as well as the membership joining and lapsing rates. The results generally confirm the dominance of the logic of influence on trade associations and the logic of services on other associations. The role of sector concentration, association age, association size, and management structure are also shown to be significant explanatory variables for some association types.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichHStaberUZimmerCBeggsJ J, 1990, “Minimalism and organizational mortality: Patterns of disbanding among US Trade Associations 1900–1983”, in Organisational Evolution: New Directions Ed. SinghJ V (Sage, London) pp 21–52
2.
BennettR J (Ed.), 1997Trade Associations in Britain and Germany: Responding to Internationalization and the EU (Anglo-German Foundation, London)
3.
BennettR J, 1998a, “The logic of membership of sectoral business associations”, Review of Social Economy forthcoming
4.
BennettR J, 1998b, “Business association and their potential to contribute to economic development: Reexploring an interface between the state and market”Environment and Planning A301367–1387
5.
BennettR J, 1998c, “Explaining the membership of voluntary local business associations, the example of British Chambers of Commerce”Regional Studies32503–514
6.
BlankS, 1973Industry and Government in Britain: The Federation of British Industries in Politics, 1945–65 (Saxon House, Farnborough, Hants)
7.
BoléatM, 1996Trade Association Strategy and ManagementAssociation of British Insurers, 51 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HQ
8.
BowenS, 1997, “Companies, trade associations and information exchange”Trade Associations in Britain and Germany: Responding to Internationalization and the EU Ed. BennettR J (Anglo-German Foundation, London)
9.
BowmanJ R, 1989Capitalist Collective Action: Competition, Co-operation and Conflict in the Coal Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
CBD Research, 1996Directory of Business AssociationsCBD Research Ltd, 15 Wickham Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 5JS
11.
CP, 1997, “Benchmarking of small, medium and large trade association”, Compass Partnership, Association of British Insurers, 51 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HQ
12.
CrouchCTraxlerF, 1995Organised Industrial Interest in Europe: What Future? (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
13.
CzadaR MWindhoff-HéritierA (Eds), 1991Political Choice: Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality (Campus, Frankfurt am Main)
14.
LordDevlin, 1972Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Industrial and Commercial RepresentationAssociation of British Chambers of Commerce, 22 Carlisle Place, London SW1P 1JA and Confederation of British Industry, Centre Point, New Oxford Street, London WC1A 1DU
15.
DTI, 1996A Best Practice Guide for the Model Trade AssociationDepartment of Trade and Industry, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H OET
16.
Financial Times1996, “The voice trainer: The new president of the Chartered Accountants talks about his strategies for unity in diversity”, 5 June
17.
FichmanMLevinthalD A, 1988, “Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships”, working paper, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
18.
GrantW (Ed.), 1987Business Interests, Organisational Development and Private Interest Government (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin)
19.
HardyM W, 1993Regression with Dummy Variables (Sage, London)
20.
HirschmanA O, 1970Exit, Voice and Loyalty (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
HirschmanA O, 1982Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
22.
LanzalacoL, 1992, “Coping with heterogeneity: Peak associations of business within and across Western European nations”, in Organised Interest in the European Community Eds GreenwoodJGroteJ RRonitK (Sage, London) pp 173–192
23.
LindbergL NCampbellJ LHollingsworthJ R, 1991, “Economic governance and the analysis of structural change in the American economy”, in Governance of the American Economy Eds CampbellJ LHollingsworthJ RLindbergL N (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 3–34
24.
LorenzE H, 1993, “Flexible production systems and the social construction of trust”Politics and Society21307–324
25.
MeisterA, 1984Participation, Association, Development and Change translated and edited by RossJ C (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)
26.
MizruchiM S, 1992The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and their Consequences (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
OlsonM, 1971The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups2nd edition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
PriceJ L, 1977The Study of Turnover (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA)
30.
SadowskiDJacobiO (Eds), 1991Employers' Associations in Europe: Policy and Organisation (Nomos, Baden-Baden)
31.
SalisburyR H, 1984, “Interest representation: The dominance of institutions”American Political Science Review78(1) 64–76
32.
StaberU, 1987, “Corporatism and the governance structure of American trade associations”Political Studies35278–288
33.
StaberU, 1989, “Age-dependence and historical effects on the failure rates of worker cooperatives”Economic and Industrial Democracy1059–80
34.
StreeckW, 1991, “Interest heterogeneity and organizing capacity: Two class logics of collective action?”, in Political Choice: Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality Eds CzadaR MWindhoff-HéritierA (Campus, Frankfurt am Main) pp 169–198
35.
StreeckWSchmitterP C (Eds), 1985Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State (Sage, London)
36.
The Times1996, “Those who adapt will flourish: Francis Gibb talks in his last week as secretary-general of the Law Society”, 28 May
37.
UngerBvan WaardenF, 1995Convergence of Diversity: Internationalisation and Economic Policy Response (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
38.
UseemM, 1984The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
39.
van SchendelenM P C M (Ed.), 1993National, Public and Private EC Lobbying (Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants)
40.
van WaardenF, 1991, “Two logics of collective action? Business associations as distinct from trade unions: The problem of associations of organizations”, in Employers' Associations in Europe: Policy and Organisation Eds SadowskiD and JacobiO (Nomos, Baden-Baden) pp 51–84
