In this paper the authors describe the application of spatial choice models to microlevel intermetropolitan migration destination choice data from the US Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) for the period 1985–90. The metropolitan and the microlevel data facilitate an analysis incorporating well-defined geographic units and their respective attributes, as well as an analysis disaggregated by the personal factors of migrants. The PUMS files provide one of the richest sources of national-level migration micro data in terms of geographic resolution, the number of individual or household characteristics recorded, sample size, and availability. The focus of the modelling exercise is to examine the performance of competing-destinations migration models which are based on the assumption that migrants process spatial information hierarchically. To date the only empirical testing of such models has been undertaken with aggregate spatial flow data, so the PUMS data provide a unique opportunity to examine the behaviour of the competing destinations framework in more detail. The authors provide information on the determinants of intermetropolitan migration within the USA and on the validity of the theoretical foundations of the competing-destinations framework. Traditional spatial choice models are shown to be severely misspecified and the distance-decay parameter estimates from such models to be potentially biased in such a manner that they exhibit the well-known ‘spatial structure’ effect. This effect does not appear when the parameters are estimated from competing-destinations models.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonW PPapageorgiouY Y, 1994, “An analysis of migration streams for the Canadian regional system 1952–1983: 1. Migration probabilities”Geographical Analysis2615–36
2.
BatsellR R, 1981, “A multiattribute extension of the Luce model which simultaneously scales utility and substitutability”, working paper, J H Jones Graduate School of Administration, Rice University, Houston, TX
3.
Ben-AkivaMLermanS R, 1985Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BorgersATimmermansH J P, 1987, “Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: A simulation experiment”Regional Science and Urban Economics1729–47
5.
BoyerRSavageauD, 1989Places Rated Almanac: Your Guide to Finding the Best Places to Live in America (Prentice Hall, New York)
6.
BoylePFlowerdewR, 1995, “Analysing local-area age- and sex-specific migration flow data from the 1991 Census”, paper presented at the Institute of British Geographers Annual Meeting, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne; copy available from Dr Boyle, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds
7.
CurtisAFotheringhamA S, 1995, “Large-scale information surfaces: An analysis of city-name recalls in the United States”Geoforum26(1) 75–87
8.
DeJongG FGardnerR W, 1981, “Introduction and overview”, in Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries Eds DeJongG FGardnerR W (Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY) pp 1–10
FischerM MNijkampP, 1987, “From static towards dynamic discrete choice modelling”Regional Science and Urban Economics173–27
11.
FikT JMulliganG F, 1990, “Spatial flows and competing central places: Towards a general theory of hierarchical interaction”Environment and Planning A22527–549
12.
FikT JAmeyR GMulliganG F, 1992, “Labor migration amongst hierarchically competing and intervening origins and destinations”Environment and Planning A241271–1290
13.
FotheringhamA S, 1981, “Spatial structure and distance-decay parameters”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71425–436
14.
FotheringhamA S, 1983, “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations”Environment and Planning A1515–36
15.
FotheringhamA S, 1986, “Modelling hierarchical destination choice”Environment and Planning A18401–418
16.
FotheringhamA S, 1991, “Statistical modeling of spatial choice: An overview”, in Spatial Analysis in Marketing: Theory, Methods, and Applications Eds GhoshAIngeneC (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 95–118
17.
FotheringhamA SCurtisA, 1992, “Encoding spatial information: The evidence for hierarchical processing”, in Theories and Methods of Spatio-temporal Reasoning Eds FrankACamparI (Springer, Dortmund) pp 269–287
18.
FotheringhamA SO'KellyM E, 1989Spatial Interaction Models: Formulations and Applications (Kluwer, Dordrecht)
19.
FotheringhamA SPellegriniP A, 1996, “Microdata for migration analysis: A comparison of sources in the US, Britain and Canada”Area28347–357
20.
GouldPWhiteR, 1974Mental Maps (Penguin Books, New York)
21.
GreeneW H, 1995LIMDEP Version 7.0 (Econometric Software, Bellport, NY)
22.
HaynesK EFotheringhamA S, 1990, “The impact of space on the application of discrete choice models”Review of Regional Studies20(2) 39–49
23.
IshikawaY, 1987, “An empirical study of the competing destination model using Japanese interaction data”Environment and Planning A191359–1373
24.
KanaroglouPFergusonM R, 1996, “Discrete spatial choice models for aggregate destinations”Journal of Regional Science36271–290
25.
KanaroglouPLiawK-LPapageorgiouY Y, 1986, “An analysis of migratory systems: 1. Theory”Environment and Planning A18913–928
26.
KrmenecA JEsparzaA, 1993, “Modeling interaction in a system of markets”Geographical Analysis25354–368
27.
LiawK-L, 1990, “Joint effects of personal factors and ecological variables on the interprovincial migration pattern of young adults in Canada”Geographical Analysis22189–208
28.
LiawK-LKawabeH, 1994, “The dependence of marriage migrations in Japan on personal factors and ecological variables”Mathematical Population Studies4235–258
29.
LiawK-LLedentJ, 1987, “Nested logit model and maximum quasi-likelihood method”Regional Science and Urban Economics1767–88
30.
LiawK-LKanaroglouPMoffettP, 1986, “Metropolitan outmigration pattern of Canadian labour force entrants, 1971–76”The Canadian Geographer30229–242
31.
LoL, 1991, “Substitutability, spatial structure, and spatial interaction”Geographical Analysis23132–146
32.
LongL H, 1988Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States, Census Monograph Series: The Population of the United States in the 1980s (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)
33.
McFaddenD, 1974, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior”, in Frontiers in Econometrics Ed. ZarembkaP (Academic Press, New York) pp 105–142
34.
McFaddenD, 1978, “Modelling the choice of residential location”, in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models Eds KarlqvistALundqvistLSnickersFWeilbullJ W (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 75–96
35.
MaierGWeissP, 1991, “The discrete choice approach to migration modelling”, in Migration Models: Macro and Micro Approaches Eds StillwellJCongdonP (Bellhaven Press, London) pp 17–33
36.
MorrillR, 1994, “Age-specific migration and regional diversity”Environment and Planning A261699–1710
37.
MyrdalG, 1957Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (Methuen, London)
38.
NewboldK BLiawK-L, 1994, “Return and onward interprovincial migration through economic boom and bust: From 1976–81 to 1981–86”Geographical Analysis26228–245
39.
NewboldK BLiawK-L, 1995, “Return and onward migration in Canada, 1976–1981: An explanation based on personal and ecological variables”The Canadian Geographer39(1) 16–30
40.
PellegriniP A, 1996Migration Modeling Using the Public Use Microdata Samples, 1985–1990 unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
41.
PellegriniP A, 1997a, “Spatial structure and intermetropolitan migration destination choice”, paper presented at the 44th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Buffalo, NY, November; copy available from author
42.
PellegriniP A, 1997b, “Intermetropolitan migration in the US, 1985–1990: The role of migrant selectivity”, copy available from author
43.
PellegriniP AFotheringhamA S, 1997, “Modeling the destination choices of migrants”, copy available from authors
44.
PoolerJ, 1994, “An extended family of spatial interaction models”Progress in Human Geography18(1) 17–39
45.
RossiP H, 1955Why Families Move (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
46.
ShawR P, 1985Intermetropolitan Migration in Canada: Changing Determinants over Three Decades (New Canada Publications, Toronto)
47.
SjaastadL A, 1962, “The costs and returns of human migration”Journal of Political Economy7080–93
48.
StevensS S, 1957, “On the psychophysical laws”Psychological Review64153–181
49.
ThillJ C, 1992, “Choice set formation for destination choice modelling”Progress in Human Geography16361–382
50.
USBC, 1991State and Metropolitan Area Data BookUS Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
51.
USDC, 19931990 Census of Population and Housing, Public Use Microdata Samples—United States: 5 Percent Sample, Compact Discs and Technical DocumentationUS Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Data User Services Division, Washington, DC
52.
WrigleyN, 1985Categorical Data Analysis for Geographers and Environmental Scientists (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
