In this paper I explore the key elements of the mode of regulation operating at the urban scale in Toronto's postwar period to learn what it was that inspired an entire generation of scholars to call Toronto the ‘city that works' in this period. Despite the significant amount of literature discussing the general character of regulation operating at the city-region scale in the Fordist or managerial period of urban development, it is argued that surprisingly little empirical research has actually documented what allegedly made these Fordist metropolitan regions ‘work‘. Drawing on archival research in addition to insights from Canadian applied regulation theory and from an analysis of Canada's changing fiscal federalism, I argue that, although Toronto did develop within the context of a Fordist regime of accumulation, the particular elements of the mode of regulation it developed at the urban scale were distinctive and important in providing the conditions underlying the economic success of the region. Toronto may have benefited disproportionately from national regulatory policies. However, its economic dynamism also constituted one of the cornerstones of the nation's economic and social viability. Further, its more localized regulatory structures and social context had a specific institutional and cultural richness, which, in concert with its highly developed economic structure, served to stave off many of the crisis tendencies being felt by other industrial regions in the 1970s and 1980s. One of the principal and unique institutional innovations was the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto (’Metro'), which can be regarded as a key (although hitherto underemphasized) component of the Canadian Fordist regime of accumulation. More than just a conduit through which nationally driven Keynesian welfare programs were delivered, Metro was also an innovator of unique urban-based postwar development policies. I conclude by demonstrating what this story of postwar Toronto can tell us more generally about urban government and governance under Fordism, and about the managerial paradigm and the regulation approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlboGJensonJ, 1997, “Remapping Canada: The state in the era of globalization”, in Understanding Canada: Building on the New Canadian Political Economy Ed. ClementW (McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp 215–239.
2.
AminA, 1994, “Post-Fordism: Models, fantasies and phantoms of transition”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–39.
3.
BantingK G, 1987The Welfare State and Canadian Federalism (McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal).
4.
BarlowI M, 1996Metropolitan Government (Routledge, London).
5.
Berridge Lewinberg Greenberg Dark Gabor Ltd, BlaisPGertlerM S, 1995, “Adapting to the new realities: industrial land outlook for Metropolitan Toronto, Durham, York, Halton, Peel, Hamilton-Wentworth and Waterloo”; copy available from the City of Toronto Planning Department, Toronto.
6.
Board of Trade, 1968, “Annual report”, Toronto Board of Trade, Toronto.
7.
Boston Consulting Group, 1995, “The fourth era: The economic challenges facing the GTA: Summary of a study prepared by the Toronto office of the Boston Consulting Group for the Greater Toronto Area Task Force, Toronto, Ontario”, in Greater Toronto CD-rom version (Queen's Pinter, Toronto).
8.
BoudreauJ, 1999, “Megacity Toronto: Struggles over differing aspects of middle-class politics”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23771–781.
9.
BoudreauJ, 2000The Megacity Saga: Democracy and Citizenship in this Global Age (Black Rose Books, Montreal).
10.
BourneL S, 1997, “Governance, efficiency and social equity in large urban agglomerations: Examples from the recent Toronto experience”, paper presented at the International Geographical Union, Mexico City, Mexico; copy available from L S Bourne, Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto.
11.
BrennerN, 1998, “Global cities, global states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”Review of International Political Economy5(1)1–37.
12.
BrittonJ N HGilmourJ, 1978The Weakest Link: A Technological Perspective on Canadian Industrial Development (Science Council of Canada, Ottawa).
13.
BromleyI, 1994, “Five reasons why the last recession was so deep, so long, so Toronto”, paper presented at the 1994 Economic Forum on the Future of the Greater Toronto Area, Toronto, Ontario; copy available from I Bromley, Ontario Ministry of EconomicDevelopment and Trade, Toronto.
14.
CameronDSimeonR, 1997, “Ontario in confederation: The not-so-friendly giant”, in The Government and Politics of Ontario Ed. WhiteG (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
15.
CaulfieldJ, 1988, “The interpretation of urban reform”Urban History Review17105–111.
16.
ClementW, 1978A Practical Guide to Canadian Political Economy (Lorimer, Toronto).
17.
ClementW, 1989, “Debates and directions: A Political economy of resources”, in The New Canadian Political Economy Eds ClementWWilliamsG (McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp 83–102.
18.
CochraneW, 1993Whatever Happened to Local Government (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
19.
ColtonT J, 1980Big Daddy: Frederick G. Gardiner and the Building of Metropolitan Toronto (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
20.
Crocker and Associates Inc., 1980, “Qualitative research into the perceptions and attitudes of business, labour and local government towards an economic development strategy for the Economic Development Steering Committee of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto”, copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
21.
CroucherS, 1997, “Constructing the image of ethnic harmony in Toronto, Canada: The politics of problem definition and nondefinition”Urban Affairs Review32319–347.
22.
DonaldB, 2002, “The permeable city: Toronto's spatial shift at the turn of the millennium”The Professional Geographer54190–203.
23.
EsserJHirschJ, 1994, “The crisis of fordism and the dimensions of a ‘post-Fordist’ regional and urban structure”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 387–408.
24.
FieldN CKerrD P, 1968Geographical Aspects of Industrial Growth in the Metropolitan Toronto Region (Queen's Printer, Toronto).
25.
FilionP, 1995, “Fordism, post-fordism and urban policy-making: Urban renewal in a medium-size Canadian city”Canadian Journal of Urban Research443–71.
26.
FilionP, 1996, “Metropolitan planning objectives and implementation constraints: Planning in a post-Fordist and postmodern age”Environment and Planning A281637–1660.
27.
FloridaRJonasA, 1991, “U.S. urban policy: The postwar state and capitalist regulation”Antipode23349–384.
28.
FriskenF, 1990Planning and Servicing the Greater Toronto Area: The Interplay of Provincial and Municipal Interests Urban Studies Program, York University, Toronto.
29.
FriskenF, 1994The Changing Canadian Metropolis: A Public Policy Perspective (Institute of Governmental Studies Press, Berkeley, CA).
30.
FriskenFBourneL SGadGMurdiR A, 1997Governance and Social Well-being in the Toronto Area: Past Achievements and Future ChallengesCentre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto.
31.
GadG, 1985, “Office location dynamics in Toronto: Suburbanization and central district specialization”Urban Geography6331–351.
32.
GardnerR L, 1983, “Industrial development in metropolitan Toronto: Issues, prospects and strategy”, paper prepared for the Economic Development Office of the Chairman, Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto; copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 225 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
33.
GertlerM S, 1988, “The limits of flexibility: Comments on the post-Fordist vision of production and its geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series13419–432.
34.
GertlerM S, 1991Toronto: The State of the Regional Economy (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Toronto).
35.
GertlerM S, 1995, “ ‘Being there’: Proximity, organization and culture in the production and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies”Economic Geography711–26.
36.
GoldenbergC, 1965Report of the Royal Commission on Metropolitan Toronto (Queen's Printer, Toronto).
37.
GoodwinM, 1996, “Governing the spaces of difference: Regulation and globalization in London”Urban Studies331395–1406.
38.
GoodwinM, 2001, “Regulation as process: Regulation theory and comparative urban and regional research”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment1671–87.
39.
GrahamK APhillipsS DMasloveA M, 1998Urban Governance in Canada: Representation, Resources, and Restructuring (Harcourt Brace Canada, Toronto).
40.
HarrisR, 1986, “Boom and bust: The effects of house price inflation on homeownership patterns in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver”The Canadian Geographer30302–315.
41.
HarveyD, 1989a, “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism”Geografiska Annaler B713–17.
42.
HarveyD, 1989bThe Condition of Postmodernity (Blackwell, Oxford).
43.
HayC, 1995, “Re-stating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local state”Economy and Society24387–407.
44.
HirstPZeitlinJ, 1991, “Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: Theory, evidence and policy implications”Economy and Society201–56.
45.
HobsonPSt-HilaireF (Eds), 1997Urban Governance and Finance (Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal).
46.
HolmesJ, 1991, “The globalization of production and the future of Canada's mature industries: The case of the automotive industry”, in The New Era of Global Competition: State Policy and Market Power Eds DracheDGertlerM S (McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp 153–180.
47.
HudsonR, 1989, “Labour-market changes and new forms of work in old industrial regions: Maybe flexibility for some but not flexible accumulation”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space75–30.
48.
IsinE F, 1998, “Governing Toronto without government: Liberalism and neoliberalism”Studies in Political Economy56169–191.
49.
JensonJ, 1989, “ ‘Different’, but not ‘exceptional’: Canada's permeable fordism”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology2669–94.
50.
JensonJ, 1990, “Representations in crisis: The roots of Canada's permeable fordism”Canadian Journal of Political Science23653–683.
51.
JensonJ, 1993, “Naming nations: Making nationalist claims in Canadian public discourse”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30337–358.
52.
JessopB, 1990, “Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect”Economy and Society19153–216.
53.
JessopB, 1995, “Towards a Schumpeterian workfare regime in Britain? Reflections on regulation, governance, and the welfare state”Environment and Planning A271613–1626.
54.
JessopB, 1997, “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: Accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory Ed. LauriaM (Sage, London) pp 51–73.
55.
JessopBPeckJTickellA, 1999, “Retooling the machine: Economic crisis, state restructuring, and urban politics”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasA E GWilsonD (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 141–159.
56.
JonesM R, 1997, “Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831–864.
57.
KeilR, 1998a, “Toronto in the 1990s: Dissociated governance?”Studies in Political Economy56151–167.
58.
KeilR, 1998bLos Angeles (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
59.
KeilR, 2000, “Governance restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or secession”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24758–781.
60.
KeilRKipferS, 2002, “The urban experience”, copy available from Roger Keil, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto.
61.
KilbournW, 1984Toronto Remembered: A Celebration of the City (Stoddart, Toronto).
62.
LemonJ T, 1985Toronto Since 1981: An Illustrated History (James Lorimer, Toronto).
63.
LemonJ T, 1996Liberal Dreams and Nature's Limits (Oxford University Press, Toronto).
64.
LewisR, 1996, “Redesigning the workplace: The North American flexible factory in the interwar period”, copy available from R Lewis, Department of Geography, University of Toronto, Toronto.
65.
LeyD, 1996The New Middle Class and the Remaking of the Central City (Oxford University Press, New York).
LorimerJ, 1983, “Citizens and the corporate development of the contemporary Canadian city”Urban History Review2–3 June.
68.
MacdonaldD S, 1985Report for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa).
69.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999a, “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale and explanation”Political Geography18697–730.
70.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999b, “Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527.
71.
MacLeodGJonesM, 1999, “Reregulating a regional rustbelt: Institutional fixes, entrepreneurial discourse, and the ‘politics of representation’”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17575–605.
72.
MagnussonW, 1996The Search for Political Space (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
73.
MarstonS A, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242.
74.
MayerM, 1991, “Politics in the post-Fordist city”Socialist Review21105–124.
75.
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 1974–89, “Annual reports”, copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
76.
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 1989, “Demographic changes within the municipality of metropolitan Toronto”, copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
77.
Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, Chief Administrator's Office, 1993, “Metro's role: factsheet number 2”, copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
78.
NashCSkaburskisA, 1998, “Toronto's changing rent control policy”, in Rent Control: Regulation and the Rental Housing Market Eds KeatingW DTeitzM BSkaburskisA (Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 169–192.
79.
NellesH V, 1990, “ ‘Red tied’: Fin de siècle politics in Ontario”, in Canadian Politics in the 1990s Ed. WilliamsG (Nelson Canada, Toronto).
80.
NorrieK, 1993, “Intergovernmental transfers in Canada: An historical perspective on some current policy choices”, in A Partnership in Trouble: Renegotiating Fiscal Federalism Ed. LeslieP M (CD Howe Institute, Toronto) pp 87–129.
81.
O'GradyJ, 1994, “Province of Ontario, Canada: Removing the obstacles to negotiated adjustments”, in Creating Economic Opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring Eds SengenbergerWCampbellD (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva).
82.
Ontario Ministry of Treasury and Economics, 1988Ontario Economic Accounts: Quarterly Historical Data 1961–1987 (Queen's Printer, Toronto).
83.
Ontario Ministry of Treasury, Economics and Intergovernmental Affairs, Municipal Finance Branch, 1976Regional Government in Perspective: A Financial Review (Queen's Printer, Toronto).
84.
PainterJ, 1995, “Regulation theory, post-Fordism and urban politics”, in Theories of Urban Politics Eds JudgeEStokerGWolmanH (Sage, London) pp 276–295.
85.
PainterJGoodwinM, 1995, “Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation”Economy and Society24334–356.
86.
PeckJ, 2000, “Doing regulation”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkGGertlerMFeldmanM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 61–80.
87.
ReaK J, 1985The Prosperous Years: The Economic History of Ontario, 1939–1975 (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
88.
RobartsJ, 1977Report of the Royal Commission on Metropolitan Toronto, Volumes 1 and 2 (Queen's Printer, Toronto).
89.
RoseA, 1972Governing Metropolitan Toronto (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
90.
RutherfordT, 2002, “Local representations in crisis: Associational governance and the case of the UK”, paper presented at the Association of American Geographers 98th Annual Meeting 20 March, Los Angeles, CA; copy available from T D Rutherford, Department of Geography, Syracuse University,Syracuse, NY.
91.
SanctonA, 2000, “The municipal role in governance of Canadian cities”, in Canadian Cities in Transition Eds BuntingTFilionP (Oxford University Press, Toronto) pp 425–442.
92.
SayerA, 1989, “Postfordism in question”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research13666–695.
93.
SchoenbergerE, 1988, “From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies, and international location”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6245–262.
94.
SewellJ, 1993The Shape of the City. Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).
95.
SharpeL J, 1996, “Is there a case for metropolitan government?”, in Urban Regions in a Global Context: Directionsfor the Greater Toronto Area Eds BellJ KWebberS, Centre for Urban and Community Studies and Program in Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 83–102.
96.
SmallwoodF, 1963Metro Toronto: A Decade Later (Bureau of Municipal Research, Toronto).
97.
SpeltJ, 1973Canadian Cities Series: Toronto (Collier Macmillan Canada, Toronto).
98.
StokerGMossbergerK, 1995, “The post-Fordist local state: The dynamics of its development”, in Local Government in the 1990s Eds StewartJKingD (Macmillan, Baskingstoke, Hants) pp 210–227.
99.
SwyngedouwE, 1989, “The heart of the place: The resurrection of locality in an age of hyperspace”Geografiska Annaler B7131–43.
100.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford, New York) pp 138–166.
101.
TAIDB (Toronto Area Industrial Development Board), copy available from The City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
102.
1958, “Brochure statistics and information 1938–1979”, series 30 subseries 2, file 2.
103.
1970, “President's report to the board”, series 30, subseries 2, file 2.
104.
1975a, “News bulletin”.
105.
1975b, “Annual report”.
106.
TickellAPeckJ A, 1992, “Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism: Missing links in regulationist research”Progress in Human Geography16190–218.
107.
ToddG, 1998, “Megacity: Globalization and governance in Toronto”Studies in Political Economy56193–216.
108.
WekerleGPeakeL, 1996, “New social movements and women's urban activism”, in City Lives and City Forms: Critical Research and Canadian Urbanism Eds CaulfieldJ KPeakeL (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) pp 263–281.
109.
WilliamsK TWilliamsC JHaslamC, 1987, “The end of mass production?”Economy and Society16405–439.
110.
WolfeD AGertlerM S, 1998, “The regional innovation system in Ontario”, in Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World Eds BraczykH JCookePHeidenreichM (UCL Press, London) pp 99–135.
111.
Wood Gundy Limited, Dominion Securities Corporation, Harris and Partners Limited, 1975, “The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: an economic and financial survey: Fiscal Agency Group”, copy available at the City of Toronto Archives, 255 Spadina Road, Toronto, Ontario M5R 2V3.
