The influence of the diffusion of information and communication technologies (ICT) on the organisation and location of firms has been the subject of an important debate in economic literature. In contrast we focus in this paper on the effects of the organisational and spatial structures and behaviours of firms on ICT adoption. These effects are tested by means of an original data set of approximately 5000 French industrial firms, which enables us to combine the different components of the firms' internal and external modes of organisation and their relations to territories, notably by taking into account the diversity of their spatial environments (urban, periurban, or rural areas). Beyond the traditional structural determinants, results confirm that organisational factors play a significant part in ICT adoption. Among these factors, the internal and external modes of coordination of firms and the codification of knowledge, practices, and relations considerably influence the adoption of ICT. Results also confirm the importance of spatial factors such as the type of areas where firms are located, and more generally the importance of the firms' spatial structure. These results theoretically emphasise the need to depart from a vision of the firm as a single-unit entity. Empirically they suggest that ICT do not only enable the firm to manage problems of distance or of proximity, but also to manage new organisational modes in space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldermanNFisherM M, 1992, “Innovation and technological change: An Austrian – British comparison”Environment and Planning A24273–288.
2.
AminACohendetP, 1999, “Learning and adaptation in decentralised business networks”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1787–104.
3.
AmirahmadiHWallaceC, 1995, “Information technology, the organization of production, and regional development”Environment and Planning A271745–1775.
4.
AntonelliC, 1988, “A new industrial organization approach”, in New Information Technology and Industrial Change: The Italian Case Ed. AntonelliC (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 1–12.
5.
AntonelliC, 1999The Microdynamics of Technological Change (Routledge, London).
6.
AokiM, 1986, “Horizontal versus vertical information structures of the firm”American Economic Review76971–983.
7.
ArthurB, 1990, “Silicon Valley locational clusters: When do increasing returns imply monopoly”Mathematical Social Sciences19116–131.
8.
BlaasENijkampP, 1994, “New technology and regional development in the European snowbelt towards a new emerging network?”, in Patterns of a Network Economy Eds JohanssonBKarlssonCWestinL (Springer, Heidelberg), pp 275–291.
9.
BresnahanTBrynjolfssonEHittL, 2000, “IT, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: A Firm-level analysis”, mimeo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Ma; Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Wharton County Junior College, Wharton, TX.
10.
BrousseauE, 1994, “EDI and inter-firm relationships: Toward a standardization of coordination process”Information Economics and Policy6319–347.
11.
BrousseauERalletA (Eds), 1996Technologies de l'information, organisation et performances économiques (Commissariat Général au Plan, Paris).
12.
BrynjolfssonEHittL M, 1995, “Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms”Economics of Innovation and New Technology3(4) 183–200.
13.
BrynjolfssonEHittL M, 2000, “Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance”Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4) 23–48.
14.
BrynjolfssonEMendelsonH, 1993, “Information systems and the organization of modern enterprise”Journal of Organizational Computing3(3) 245–255.
15.
BrynjolfssonEMaloneTGurbaxaniVKambilA, 1994, “Does information technology lead to smaller firms?”Management Science401628–1644.
16.
CabyLGreenanNGueissazARalletA, 1999, “Quelques propositions pour une modélisation” [Proposal for a modelisation], in Innovations et performances Eds ForayDMairesseJ (Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris) pp 131–169.
17.
CapelloRNijkampP, 1996, “Telecommunications technologies and regional development: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence”The Annals of Regional Science special issue on Information and Communications Networks in Space 30(1) 7–30.
18.
Chevassus-LozzaEGallianoD, 2000, “Firms location and competitiveness”, RSAI Congress, Lugano, May, pp 1–17; copy available from Inra-Esr, BP. 27–31326, Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France.
19.
CohendetPKernFMehmanpazirBMunierF, 1999, “Knowledge coordination, competence creation and integrated networks in globalised firms”Cambridge Journal of Economics23225–241.
20.
CornfordJGillespieARichardsonR, 2000, “Regional development in the information society”, in The Information Society in Europe: Work and Life in an Age of Globalization Eds DucatelKWebsterJHerrmannW (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ) pp 21–24.
21.
CretiA, 2001, “Network technologies, communication externalities and total factor productivity”Structural Change and Economic Dynamics121–28.
22.
DupuyCGillyJ P, 1999, “Industrial groups and territories: The case of Matra Marconi Space in Toulouse”Cambridge Journal of Economics23207–223.
23.
EllisonGGlaeserE L, 1997, “Geographical concentration in US manufacturing industries: A Dartboard approach”Journal of Political Economy107889–927.
24.
FischerM M, 1995, ‘Technological change and innovation behaviour”, in Technological Change, Economic Development and Space Eds BertugliaC SFischerM M (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 145–159.
25.
FischerM MJohanssonB, 1994, “Networks for process innovation by firms: Conjectures from observations in three countries”, in Patterns of a Network Economy Eds JohanssonBKarlssonCWestinL (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 261–272.
26.
ForayDMairesseJ, 1999Innovations et performances [Innovation and performances] (Éditions de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris).
27.
FunckR HKolawskiJ S, 1990, “Innovation, new information technologies and the structure of urban regions”, in The Spatial Context of Technological Development (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants) pp 75–93.
28.
GlaeserEKallalH DScheikmanJ ASheiferA, 1992, “Growth in cities”Journal of Political Economy1001126–1152.
29.
GollacMGreenanNHamon-CholetS, 2000, “L'informatisation de l'‘ancienne’ économie: Nouvelles machines, nouvelles organisations et nouveaux travailleurs” [The computerisation of the ‘old’ economy: New machinery, new organisations, new workers]Économie et Statistique339 – 340(9/10) 171–201.
30.
GreenanNHamon-CholetS, 2000, “COI: a matched employer/employee survey on organizational change and computerization”, communication at the International Conference on Establishment Surveys II, Buffalo, New York, http://www.eia.doe.gov/ices2.
GurbaxaniVWhangS, 1991, “The impact of information systems on organizations and markets”Communications of the ACM34(1) 59–73.
34.
HagströmPHedlundG, 1999, “A three-dimensional model of changing internal structure in the firm”, in The Dynamic Firm Eds ChandlerA DJrHagströmP (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 166–191.
35.
HittL M, 1999, “Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data”Information Systems Research10(9) 134–149.
36.
HwangJ H, 1998, “Computer networks and the reorganization of corporate space: The case of the Korean electronics industry”Papers in Regional Science77(2) 131–154.
37.
INSEE-INRA, 1998, “Les campagnes et leurs villes” [The countries and their towns], Collection Contours et Caractères, Insee.
38.
KarlssonC, 1995, “Innovation adoption, innovation networks and agglomeration economies”, in Technological Change, Economic Development and Space Eds BertugliaC SFischerM MPetroG (Springer, Heidelberg) pp 184–206.
39.
KatzM LShapiroC, 1985, “Network externalities, competition and compatibility”American Economic Review75424–440.
40.
KrugmanP, 1991, “Increasing returns and economic geography”Journal of Political Economy99483–499.
41.
LiF, 1995, “Corporate networks and the spatial and functional reorganizations of large firms”Environment and Planning A271627–1645.
42.
LiFWhalleyJWilliamsH, 2001, “Between physical and electronic spaces: The implications for organisations in the networked economy”Environment and Planning A33699–716.
43.
LungYPerratJRalletATorreA, 1997, “Organisation spatiale et coordination des activités d'innovation des entreprises” [Spatial organisation and coordination of innovative activities of the firms]Commissariat Général au PlanParis, October.
44.
MarshallA, 1890Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).
45.
NewlandsDWardM, 1999, “The adoption of new communication technologies by firms in rural areas: A Scottish case study”, in Innovation, Networks and Localities Eds FischerM MSuarez-VillaLSteinerM (Springer, Heidelberg) chapter 12.
46.
NonakaITakeuchiH, 1995The Knowledge-creating Company (Oxford University Press, New York).
47.
OECD, 1997Révision des classifications des secteurs et des produits de Haute Technologie DG, 216 (OECD, Paris).
48.
OtaMFujitaM, 1993, “Communication technologies and spatial organization of multi-unit firms in metropolitan areas”Regional Science and Urban Economics23695–729.
49.
RouxP, 2001, “Dynamiques organisationnelles, interactions localisées et innovation technologique: Une investigation empirique” [Organisational dynamics, localised interactions and technological innovation: An empirical investigation]Revue d'Économie Régionale et Urbaine175–96.
50.
SteinmuellerW E, 2000, “Will new information and communication technologies improve the ‘codification’ of knowledge?”Industrial and Corporate Change9361–376.
51.
StorperM, 1996The Regional World (Guilford Press, New York).
52.
ThisseJ Fvan YperseleT, 1999, “Métropoles et concurrence territoriale”Économie et Statistique326 – 32719–30.
53.
ThomasA, 2000Économétrie des variables qualitatives [Econometrics of qualitative variables] (Dunod, Paris).
54.
WilliamsonO E, 1996The Mechanisms of Governance (Oxford University Press, New York).
