Residential development in fire-prone wildlands is occurring at an unprecedented rate. Community-based evacuation planning in many areas is an emerging need. In this paper we present a method for using microscopic traffic simulation to develop and test neighborhood evacuation plans in the urban–wildland interface. The method allows an analyst to map the subneighborhood variation in household evacuation travel times under various scenarios. A custom scenario generator manages household trip generation, departure timing, and destination choice. Traffic simulation, route choice, and dynamic visualization are handled by a commercial system. We present a case study for a controversial fire-prone canyon community east of Salt Lake City, Utah. GIS was used to map the spatial effects of a proposed second access road on household evacuation times. Our results indicate that the second road will reduce some household travel times much more than others, but all evacuation travel times will become more consistent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CameronGDuncanG, 1996, “Paramics: Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic”Journal of Supercomputing1025–53.
2.
CortnerHGardnerP, 1990, “Fire hazards at the urban–wildland interface: What the public expects”Énvironmental Management1457–62.
3.
CovaTChurchR, 1997, “Modeling community evacuation vulnerability using GIS”International Journal of Geographical Information Science11763–784.
4.
CutterS, 1996, “Vulnerability to environmental hazards”Progress in Human Geography20529–539.
5.
DavisJ, 1990, “The wildland–urban interface: Paradise or battleground”Journal of Forestry8826–31.
6.
De SilvaFEgleseR, 2000, “Integrating simulation modeling and GIS: Spatial decision support systems for evacuation planning”Journal of the Operational Research Society51423–430.
7.
DrabekT, 1996Disaster Évacuation Behavior: Tourists and other Transients Monograph 58, Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, CO..
8.
EwertA, 1993, “The wildland–urban interface: An introduction and overview”Journal of Leisure Research251–5.
9.
GAO, 1998Western National Forests: Catastrophic Wildfires Threaten Resources and Communities GAO/T-RCED-98–273, United States Government Accounting Office, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20548, http://www.gao.gov.
10.
GAO, 1999, Western National Forests: Nearby Communities Are Increasingly Threatened by Catastrophic Wildfires GAO/T-RCED-99–79, United States Government Accounting Office, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20548, http://www.gao.gov.
11.
GatrellAVincentP, 1991, “Managing natural and technological hazards”, in Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and Potential Applications Eds MasserIBlakemoreM (Longman Scientific and Technical, New York) pp 148–180.
12.
GreenbergJBradleyG1997, “Analyzing the urban–wildland interface with GIS: Two case studies”Journal of Forestry9518–22.
13.
HobeikaAKimSBeckwithR, 1994, “A decision support system for developing evacuation plans around nuclear power stations”Interfaces2422–35.
14.
HossainM, 1999, “Capacity estimation of traffic circles under mixed traffic conditions using micro-simulation technique”Transportation Research A3347–61.
15.
JohnsonJZeiglerD, 1986, “Evacuation planning for technological hazards: an emerging imperative” Cities 3 (May) 148–156.
16.
KruseRRybaA, 1999Data Structures and Program Design in C++ (Prentice-Hall, Saddle River, NJ).
17.
MeyerMMillerE, 1984Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-oriented Approach (McGraw-Hill, New York).
18.
MoellerMUrbanikTDesrosiersA, 1981, “CLEAR (calculated logical evacuation and response): a generic transportation network evacuation model for the calculation of evacuation time estimates”, prepared for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Pacific Northwest Laboratory, NUREG/CR-2504, Washington, DC.
19.
OES, 1992, “The East Bay Hills Fire—a multi-agency review of the October 1991 fire in the Oakland/Berkeley hills”, Office of Emergency Services, East Bay Hills Fire Operations Review Group, Governor's Office, Sacramento, CA..
20.
PeatMarwickMitchellCompany, 1973, “Network flow simulation for urban traffic control, system—Phase II, v. 1”, prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC 20590.
QuarantelliEBaisdenBBourdessT, 1980, “Evacuation behavior and problems: Findings and implications from the research literature”, Report 27, Disaster Research Center,Ohio State University, Columbus, OH..
25.
RathiASantiagoA, 1990, “The new NETSIM simulation program”Traffic Engineering and Control31317–320.
26.
RogersG, 1989, “Communication of emergency warning: A Cyclical process”Disaster Management123–32.
27.
RogersG OSorensenJ H, 1991, “Diffusion of emergency warning: Comparing empirical and simulation results”, in Risk Analysis Prospects and Opportunities Eds ZerrosCKnoxK EAbramsonLCoppockR (Plenum Press, New York) pp 117–134.
28.
RossS, 1989Introduction to Probability Models (Academic Press, New York).
29.
San Francisco Chronicle1991, “Charing Cross bottleneck was big killer”, 2 November, page A14.
30.
SheffiYMahmassaniHPowellW, 1982, “A transportation network evacuation model,” Transportation Research A16209–218.
31.
Sinuany-SternZSternE, 1993, “Simulating the evacuation of a small city: The effects of traffic factors”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences2797–108.
32.
SMARTEST, Simulation Modelling Applied to Road Transport European Scheme Tests Project, 1999, Institute for Transportation Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/smartest/.
33.
SorensenJ, 1988, “Warning and evacuation: Answering some basic questions”Industrial Crisis Quarterly2195–209.
34.
SorensenJ, 1991, “When shall we leave?: Factors affecting the timing of evacuation departures”International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters9153–165.
35.
SouthworthF, 1991, “Regional evacuation modeling: a state-of-the-art review”, ORNL/TM–11740, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN37831.
36.
SouthworthFChinS-M, 1987, “Network evacuation modelling for flooding as a result of dam failure”Environment and Planning A191543–1558.
37.
SternESinuany-SternZ, 1989, “A behavioral-based simulation model for urban evacuation”Papers of the Regional Science Association6687–103.
38.
TufekciSKiskoT, 1991, “Regional evacuation modeling system (REMS): A Decision support system for emergency area evacuations”Computers and Industrial Engineering2189–93.
39.
TweedieSRowlandJWalshSRhotenRHagleP, 1986, “A methodology for estimating emergency evacuation times”The Social Science Journal21189–204.
40.
UrbanikTDesrosiersALindellM KSchullerC R, 1980, “Analysis of techniques for estimating evacuation times for emergency planning zones”, Emergency Preparedness Program Office, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA; to request a copy e-mail: pnl.techlib@pnl.gov.
41.
YangQKoutsopoulosH, 1996, “A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems”Transportation Research C4113–129.
