In this paper we examine the spatial distributions of four types of technological hazards in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area. The focus is on the locations of hazardous industrial and toxic waste sites in relation to the demographic composition of adjacent neighborhoods. Our interest is to determine whether hazardous sites, including industrial facilities in the EPA's Toxic Release Inventory, Large Quantity Generators of hazardous wastes, Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, and federally identified contamination sites, are disproportionately located in areas with lower income and minority residents. We examine patterns of environmental inequity in Phoenix, a sprawling Sunbelt city with a growing post-Fordist industrial sector. First, using 1996 EPA data for four types of technological hazards, and 1995 Special Census data for Maricopa County, we employ a GIS to map the spatial distributions of hazardous sites and to analyze the demographic characteristics of census tracts with and without point-source hazards. A second methodology is used to produce a cumulative hazard density index for census tracts, based on the number of hazard zones—one-mile-radius circles around each facility—that overlay each tract. Both methodologies disclose clear patterns of social inequities in the distribution of technological hazards. The cumulative hazard density index provides a spatially sensitive methodology that reveals the disproportionate distribution of risk burdens in urban census tracts. The findings point to a consistent pattern of environmental injustice by class and race across a range of technological hazards in the Phoenix metropolitan region.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADEQ, 1998Air Quality Data for Arizona Assessment Section, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Phoenix, AZ.
2.
ADEQ, 2001Final Permit Decision and Response to Comments: Innovative Waste Utilization 12 April, Report, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Phoenix, AZ.
3.
AndertonDAndersonAOakesJFraserM, 1994, “Environmental equity: The demographics of dumping”Demography31229–248.
4.
AngelD, 1994Restructuring for Innovation: The Remaking of the US Semiconductor Industry (Guilford Press, New York).
5.
BeenV, 1995, “Analyzing evidence of environmental justice”Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law111–36.
6.
BeenVGuptaF, 1997, “Coming to the nuisance or going to the barrios? A longitudinal analysis of environmental justice claims”Ecology Law Quarterly241–56.
7.
BoerJPastorMSaddJSnyderL, 1997, “Is there environmental racism? The demographics of hazardous waste in Los Angeles County”Social Science Quarterly78793–810.
8.
BolinBMatrangaEHackettESadallaEPijawkaDBrewerDSicotteD, 2000, “Environmental equity in a Sunbelt city: The spatial distribution of toxic hazards in Phoenix, Arizona”Global Environmental Change B: Environmental Hazards211–24.
9.
BooneCModarresA, 1999, “Creating a toxic neighborhood in Los Angeles County: A historical examination of environmental inequity”Urban Affairs Review35163–187.
10.
BowenWSallingMHaynesKCyranE, 1995, “Toward environmental justice: Spatial equity in Ohio and Cleveland”Annals of the Association of American Geographers85641–663.
11.
BrownP, 1995, “Race, class, and environmental health: A review and systematization of the literature”Environmental Research6915–30.
12.
BryantBMohaiP, (Eds), 1992Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
13.
BullardR, 1990Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
14.
BullardRJohnsonGTorresA, 2000, “Environmental costs and consequences of sprawl”, in Sprawl City: Race, Politics and Planning in Atlanta Eds BullardRJohnsonGTorresA, (Island Press, Covelo, CA) pp 21–38.
15.
CEJ, 1999Environmental Justice: Research, Education, and Health Policy Needs Committee on Environmental Justice (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
16.
ChakrabortyJArmstrongM, 2001, “Assessing the impact of airborne toxic releases on populations with special needs”The Professional Geographer53119–131.
17.
ClarkeJGerlakA, 1998, “Environmental racism in the Sunbelt? A cross-cultural analysis”Environmental Management22857–867.
18.
ColeLFosterS, 2001From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement (New York University Press, New York).
19.
CrononW, 1991Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West (Norton, New York).
20.
CutterS, 1995, “Race, class and environmental justice”Progress in Human Geography19107–118.
21.
CutterSSoleckiW, 1996, “Setting environmental justice in space and place: Acute and chronic airborne toxic releases in the Southeastern United States”Urban Geography17380–399.
22.
CutterSHolmDClarkL, 1996, “The role of geographic scale in monitoring environmental justice”Risk Analysis6517–526.
23.
CutterSHodgsonMDowK, 2001, “Subsidized inequities: The spatial patterning of environmental risks and federally assisted housing”Urban Geography2229–53.
24.
DanielsGFriedmanS, 1999, “Spatial inequity and the distribution of industrial toxic releases: Evidence for the 1990 TRI”Social Science Quarterly80244–262.
25.
DavisM, 1992City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Vintage, New York).
26.
DavisM, 1998Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster (Henry Holt, New York).
27.
DavisT, 2000, “Arizona's water disaster”, in Water in the West Ed. MillerC, (University of Oregon Press, Corvallis, OR) pp 151–157.
28.
EllisAHildebrandtMFernandoH, 1999, “Evidence of lower-atmospheric ozone ‘sloshing’ in an urbanized valley”Physical Geography20520–536.
FaberD, 1998, “The political ecology of American capitalism: New challenges for the environmental justice movement”, in The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States Ed. FaberD, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 27–59.
31.
GlickmanTHershR, 1995, “Evaluating environmental equity: The impacts of industrial hazards on selected social groups in Allegheny County Pennsylvania”, DP 95–13, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
32.
GoldmanBFittonL, 1994Toxic Wastes and Race Revisited (Center for Policy Alternatives, New York).
33.
GottliebR, 1993Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement (Island Press, Washington, DC).
34.
HarrisonB, 1994Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in an Age of Flexibility (Basic Books, New York).
35.
HarveyD, 1996a, “The environment of injustice”, in The Urbanization of Injustice Eds MerrifieldASwyngedouwE, (New York University Press, New York) pp 65–99.
36.
HarveyD, 1996bJustice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, Oxford).
37.
HarveyD, 2000Spaces of Hope (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
38.
HershR, 1995, “Race and industrial hazards: An historical geography of the Pittsburgh region, 1900 – 1990”, DP 95–18, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
39.
HockmanEMorrisC, 1998, “Progress toward environmental justice: A five-year perspective of toxicity, race and poverty in Michigan, 1990 – 1995”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41157–176.
40.
HofrichterR, 2000, “Introduction: Critical perspectives on human health and the environment”, in Reclaiming the Environmental Debate: The Politics of Health in a Toxic Culture Ed. HofrichterR, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–15.
41.
HurleyA, 1995Environmental Inequalities: Class, Race, and Industrial Pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945 – 1980 (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).
42.
JerretMEylesJColeDReaderS, 1997, “Environmental equity in Canada: An empirical investigation into the income distribution of pollution in Ontario”Environment and Planning A291777–1800.
43.
KnoxPAgnewJ, 1994Geography of the World Economy (Arnold, London).
KriegE, 1995, “A socio-historical interpretation of toxic waste sites: The case of Greater Boston”The American Journal of Economics and Sociology541–14.
47.
KriegE, 1998a, “Methodological considerations in the study of toxic waste hazards”The Social Science Journal35191–201.
48.
KriegE, 1998b, “The two faces of toxic waste: Trends in the spread of environmental hazards”Sociological Forum133–19.
49.
LaituriMKirbyA, 1994, “Finding fairness in America's cities? The search for environmental equity in everyday life”Journal of Social Issues50121–139.
50.
LesterJAllenDHillK, 2001Environmental Injustice in the United States: Myths and Realities (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).
51.
LuckinghamB, 1983, “Phoenix: The desert metropolis”, in Sunbelt Cities: Politics and Growth Since World War II Eds BernardRRiceB, (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX) pp 309–327.
52.
MerrifieldA, 2000, “General law of US capitalist accumulation: Contingent work and the working class”Antipode32176–198.
53.
MitchellJThomasDCutterS, 1999, “Dumping in Dixie revisited: The evolution of environmental inequality in South Carolina”Social Science Quarterly80229–243.
54.
MohaiP, 1995, “The demographics of dumping revisited: Examining the impact of alternate methodologies on environmental justice research”Virginia Environmental Law Journal13615–653.
55.
MonmonierM, 1997Cartographies of Danger: Mapping Hazards in America (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
56.
PastorMSaddJHippJ, 2001, “Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move in and environmental justice”Journal of Urban Affairs231–21.
57.
PellowD, 2000, “Environmental inequality formation: Toward a theory of environmental injustice”American Behavioral Scientists43581–601.
58.
PerlinSSetzerRCreasonJSextonK, 1995, “Distribution of industrial air emissions by income and race in the United States: An approach using the toxic release inventory”Environmental Science and Technology2969–80.
59.
PhillipsL, 1992, “Regional relationships between toxic releases, and environmental and human exposure to toxic substances”Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology48795–802.
60.
PijawkaK DBlairJGuhathakurtaSLebiednikSAshurS, 1998, “Environmental equity in central cities: Socioeconomic dimensions and planning strategies”Journal of Planning Education and Research18113–123.
61.
PulidoL, 1996, “A critical review of the methodology of environmental racism research”Antipode28142–159.
62.
PulidoL, 2000, “Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California”Annals of the Association of American Geographers9012–40.
63.
PulidoLSidawiSVosR, 1996, “An archaeology of environment racism in Los Angeles”Urban Geography17419–439.
64.
RingquistE, 1997, “Equity and the distribution of environmental risk: The case of TRI facilities”Social Science Quarterly78811–829.
65.
RobertsS, 1973, “Minority-group poverty in Phoenix: A socio-economic survey”Journal of Arizona History14347–362.
66.
SaddJPastorMBoerJSnyderL, 1999, “Every breath you take: The demographics of point source air pollution in Southern California”Economic Development Quarterly13107–123.
67.
ScottA, 1996, “High-technology industrial development in the San Fernando Valley and Ventura County: Observations on economic growth and the evolution of urban form”, in The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century Eds ScottASojaE, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 276–310.
68.
ScottA, 1998Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
69.
ScottMCutterSMenzelCJiMWagnerD, 1997, “Spatial accuracy of the EPA's environmental hazards databases and their use in environmental equity analysis”Applied Geographic Studies145–61.
70.
ShutkinW, 2000The Land that Could Be: Environmentalism and Democracy in the Twenty-first Century (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
71.
SojaE, 1996, “Los Angeles 1965 – 1992: From crisis-genrated restructuring to restructuring-generated crisis”, in The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century Eds ScottASojaE, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 426–462.
72.
SojaE, 2000Postmetropolis: Critical Studies in Cities and Regions (Blackwell, Oxford).
73.
SzaszA, 1994Ecopopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
74.
SzaszAMeuserM, 1997, “Environmental inequalities: Literature review and proposals for new directions in research and theory”Current Sociology4599–120.
75.
SzaszAMeuserM, 2000, “Unintended, inexorable: The production of environmental inequalities in Santa Clara County, California”American Behavioral Scientist43602–632.
76.
TeshS, 2000Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).
77.
TiefenbacherJHagelmanR, 1999, “Environmental equity in urban Texas: Race, income, and patterns of acute and chronic toxic air releases in metropolitan counties”Urban Geography20516–533.
78.
TiefenbacherJKonopkaDShelleyF, 1997, “Airborne toxic emission hazards in Texas: Measuring vulnerability of place”Applied Geographic Studies1271–286.
79.
UCC, 1987Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristic with Hazardous Waste Sites United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, New York.
80.
US GAO, 1984Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities GAO/RCED-83–168, US General Accounting Office (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
81.
US GAO, 1991aToxic Chemicals: EPA's Toxic Release Inventory is Useful but can be Improved GAO/RCED-19–121, US General Accounting Office (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
82.
US GAO, 1991bToxic Chemicals: EPA's Toxic Release Inventory Program: More Comprehensive Data and Better Public Outreach Needed GAO/T-RCED-91–75, US General Accounting Office (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
83.
WeinbergA, 1998, “The environmental justice debate: New agendas for a third generation of research”Society and Natural Resources11605–614.
84.
WilliamsR, 1999, “Environmental injustice in America and its politics of scale”Political Geography1849–73.
85.
YandleTBurtonD, 1996, “Reexamining environmental justice: A statistical analysis of historical hazardous waste landfill siting patterns in metropolitan Texas”Social Science Quarterly77477–492.
86.
ZimmermanR, 1993, “Social equity and environmental risk”Risk Analysis13649–666.
