Growing concerns about the consequences of large scale production systems and, subsequently, the growing public demand for changing the dominant mode of agricultural production have become important issues on the European political agenda. In recent years the number of new or alternative food supply chains and networks that incorporate claims of sustainability and quality has grown impressively. However, compared to conventional food supply chains and networks these alternative chains and networks remain rather small. By using the example of Dutch wheat and bread, in this paper I demonstrate that the prevailing sociotechnical regime constrains the growth of new promising sustainable food supply chains and networks. Constraints are both of a technical and an institutional nature. Strategic niche management is proposed as a promising design tool to overcome some of the encountered constraints, with the aim of contributing to a transition towards a more sustainable sociotechnical regime.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddensN H H, 1952Seeds and Planting Materials in Dutch Agriculture (H Veenman en Zonen, Wageningen) (in Dutch)
2.
BouwmanP J, 1946History of Zeeland's Agriculture in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century and of the Zeeland's Farmer's Association 1843–1943 (H Veenman en Zonen, Wageningen) (in Dutch)
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of the sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–233
5.
CallonM, 1991, “Techno-economic networks and irreversibility”, in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 132–162
6.
De HaanH, 1949, “Twenty-five years list of varieties”Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift611–56 (in Dutch)
7.
DorstJ C, 1957, “A quarter of a century of plant breeding”, in Between Variety and Crop: A Series of Articles Composed on the Occasion of the 25-year Anniversary of the NAKNederlandse Algemene Keuringsdienst, PO Box 1115, 8300 BC Emmeloord, pp 121–131 (in Dutch)
8.
GeelsFKempR, 2000Transitions from a Socio-technical Perspective: Background Report for the Fourth National Environmental PlanMaastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht University, Maastricht and Centre for Studies of Science, Technology and Society, Twente University, Enschede
9.
GielenC, 1983Breeders' Rights (Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle) (in Dutch)
10.
HoogmaR J F, 2000Exploiting Technological Niches: Strategies for Experimental Introduction of Electric Vehicles (Twente University Press, Enschede)
11.
JongerdenJRuivenkampG, 1996Patterns of DiversityTechnological and Agricultural Development Group, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen (in Dutch)
12.
KaudererI J, 1993, “Wheat classification: the link between breeder, farmer and processor”, in From Quantity to Quality: Quality Day Cereals 1993 (Stichting Nederlands Graancentrum, Wageningen) pp 62–74 (in Dutch)
13.
KaudererI J, 1994, “From more to better”, in From Quantity to Quality: Quality Day Cereals 1994 (Stichting Nederlands Graancentrum, Wageningen) pp 47–61 (in Dutch)
14.
KelfkensM, 1992, “Quality of wheat in the Netherlands and the EU: past present and future”, in From Quantity to Quality: Quality Day Cereals 1992 (Stichting Nederlands Graancentrum, Wageningen) pp 3–26 (in Dutch)
15.
KelfkensMAngelinoS A G F, 1993, “The quality of baking wheat: who cares?”, in From Quantity to Quality: Quality Day Cereals 1993 (Stichting Nederlands Graancentrum, Wageningen) pp 3–31 (in Dutch)
16.
KempRSchotJHoogmaR J F, 1998, “Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management”10175–196
17.
MoorsE H MWiskerkeJ S CRipA, 2002, “The dynamics of innovation: a sociotechnical perspective”, in Seeds of Transition: Essays on Novelty Production, Niches and Regimes in Agriculture Eds WiskerkeJ S CVan der PloegJ D (Van Gorcum, Assen) pp 25–42
18.
OerlemansN JWiskerkeJ S C, 2000, “Making agriculture sustainable: a description and analysis of barriers and driving forces for farmers' networking and institutional strategies in the Netherlands”, un published report, Centre for Agriculture and Environment, PO Box 10015, 3505 AA, Utrecht
19.
Oortwijn BotjesJ G, 1957, “Remembrance of the foundation of the NAK”, in Between Variety and Crop: A Series of Articles Composed on the Occasion of the 25-year Anniversary of the NAKNederlandse Algemene Keuringsdienst, pp 12–18 (in Dutch)
20.
RipAKempR, 1998, “Technological Change”, in Human Choice and Climate Change Eds RaynerSMaloneE L (Batelle Press, Columbus, OH) pp 327–399
21.
RoepD, 2000Innovative Work: Tracks of Capacity and Incapacity PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen (in Dutch)
22.
RotmansJKempRVan AsseltMGeelsFVerbongFMolendijkK, 2000Transitions and Transition Management: the Case of Low-emission Energy SupplyICIS, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven and MERIT, Maastricht University, Maastricht (in Dutch)
23.
SchotJ W, 1991Societal Steering of Technological Development: Constructive Technology Assessment as Contemporary Luddism (Twente University Press, Enschede) (in Dutch)
24.
SneepJ, 1976, “History, laws and organisations”, unpublished report, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen (in Dutch)
StassartP, 1999On Knowing About Taste: 101 Routes for Quality Food ChainsFondation Universitaire Luxembourgeoise, Arlon and Vredeseilanden-Coopido, Leuven (in French)
Van BeukeringP H M, 1992, “Legal protection of breeders' products”, in Production of Seeds and Planting Materials Ed. ZevenA C, Department of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, pp 1–13 (in Dutch)
29.
Van der KooijP A C E, 1990The Development of Breeders' Rights (Tjeenk Willink, Zwolle) (in Dutch)
30.
Van der PloegJ D, 1999The Virtual Farmer (Van Gorcum, Assen) (in Dutch)
31.
Van der PloegJ DRentingHMinderhoud-JonesM, 2000, “The socio-economic impact of rural development: realities and potentials”Sociologia Ruralis40 (special issue) 391–547
32.
Van LenteH, 1993Promising Technology: The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments (Twente University Press, Enschede)
33.
Van ZandenJ L, 1986, “Modernisation and the growing impact of government intervention”, in Agricultural History of the Netherlands: from Pre-historic Times to present Ed. NoordegraafL (Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag) pp 85–140 (in Dutch)
34.
WeberMHoogmaR J FLaneBSchotJ, 1998Experimenting with Sustainable Transport Innovations: A Workbook for Strategic Niche Management (Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville)
35.
WiskerkeJ S C, 1995, “Arable farmers: a new interpretation of sustainable baking wheat cultivation”, in Beyond Modernization: the Impact of Endogenous Rural Development Eds Van der PloegJ DVan DijkG (Van Gorcum, Assen) pp 233–255
36.
WiskerkeJ S C, 1997Zeeland's Arable Agriculture Between and Continuity: a Sociological Study on Diversity in Farming, Technology Development and Rural Innovation PhD thesis, Department of Sociology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen (in Dutch)
37.
WiskerkeJ S C, 2001, “Multi-functionality and rural development: topics for a new socio-economic research agenda”Tijdschrift voor sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de landbouw16114–119
38.
WiskerkeJ S CVan der PloegJ D, 2002Seeds of Transition: Essays on Novelty Production, Niches and Regimes in Agriculture (Van Gorcum, Assen)
39.
WiskerkeJ S CVerhoevenF P MBrussaardL, 2002, “Redesigning Dutch dairy farming: a farmer's driven multi-disciplinary approach”Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science50 (special issue)
