Despite its apparent irrelevance as a scale or space of sociocultural organisation, the neighbourhood is back on the political agenda. At an international level, the neighbourhood—or, more specifically, the ‘global neighbourhood'—is being promoted as a moral space through which to manage the complex economic, political, and ecological problems of the planet. Mirroring this process at a national level, in the United Kingdom the neighbourhood has been rediscovered and now provides the parameters through which a range of antipoverty, welfare, and local democracy programmes are being delivered. In light of its contemporary political popularity, this paper presents a critical reanalysis of the concept of the neighbourhood. In particular, the analysis explores the ideological and political uses of the ideal of neighbourhood, and how these processes relate to a particular ‘politics of scale'. In order to unpack the various politics of scales associated with the neighbourhood, the analysis combines theories of scale with Lefebvre's work on the production of space. Drawing on these theoretical insights and the case of neighbourhood politics in the town of Walsall in the United Kingdom, I explore the political narratives and practices through which the neighbourhood scale is produced and contested, and question the ability of neighbourhoods, as they are currently being constructed in the United Kingdom, to offer locally empowering scales of political and social organisation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 2002, “Spatialities of globalisation”Environment and Planning A34385–399.
2.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities—Reimagining the Urban (Polity Press, Cambridge).
3.
BaumanZ, 1998Globalisation—The Human Consequences (Columbia University Press, New York).
4.
BrennerN, 1998, “Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”Review of International Political Economy51–37.
5.
BrennerN, 1999, “Beyond state–centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalisation studies”Theory and Society2839–78.
6.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale: Methodological reflections on the structuration of scale”Progress in Human Geography25591–614.
7.
BurgessE, 1925, “Can neighbourhood work have a scientific basis”, in The City Eds ParkRBurgessE (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 142–155.
8.
CarterH, 1972The Study of Urban Geography (Edward Arnold, London).
9.
CaseyE, 1997The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
10.
CastellsM, 1977The Urban Question: a Marxist Approach (Edward Arnold, London).
11.
CoxK, 1981, “Capitalism and conflict around the communal living space” in Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Society Eds DearMScottA (Methuen, London) pp 431–455.
12.
CoxKJonasA, 1993, “Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128–37.
13.
DavisM, 1989City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Verso, London).
14.
DearMLongJ, 1978, “Community strategies in locational conflict”, in Urbanization and Conflict in Market Societies Ed. CoxK (Methuen, London) pp 113–127.
15.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
16.
1998A New Deal for Communities.
17.
1999Delivering an Urban Renaissance: The Report of the Urban Task Force.
18.
2000Our Towns and Cities: The Future: Delivering an Urban Renaissance Cm 4911 (The Stationery Office, London).
19.
ForrestR, 2000, “Does neighbourhood still matter in a globalised world?”, OP 5, Centre for Comparative Public Management and Social Policy, City University of Hong Kong.
20.
GalsterG, 2001, “On the nature of neighbourhood”Urban Studies382111–2124.
HarveyD, 1996Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, Oxford).
27.
HarveyD, 2000Spaces of Hope (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
28.
HerodA, 1991, “The production of scale in United States labour relations”Area2382–88.
29.
Institute of Local Government Studies, 1997, “Evaluating community empowerment in Walsall 1996–7: an assessment of the first year's progress of ‘empowerment of communities’ living in the seven neighbourhoods of Walsall's 1996–2003 Single Regeneration Budget Scheme”, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
30.
JacobsJ, 1994The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx).
31.
JonasA, 1994“The scale politics of spatiality”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–264.
32.
JonesM R, 1997, “Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831–864.
33.
JonesM, 1998, “Restructuring the local state: Economic governance or social regulation?”Political Geography17959–988.
34.
JonesMWardK, 2002, “Excavating the logic of British neoliberal urban policy: Towards a ‘forth-cut’ theory of crisis”Antipode34473–494.
35.
KearnsAParkinsonM, 2001, “The significance of neighbourhood”Urban Studies382103–2110.
36.
KellerS, 1968The Urban Neighbourhood: A Sociological Perspective (Random House, New York).
37.
KofmanELebasE, 1996Writing on Cities—Henri Lefebvre (Blackwell, Oxford).
38.
LefebvreH, 1967, “Quartier et ville de quartier”, Cahiers de l'Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme de la Région d'Île-de-France, Institut d'Aménagement et d'Urbanisme de la Région d'Île-de-France, Paris.
LefebvreH, 1971Everyday Life in the Modern World (Allen Lane, London).
41.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford).
42.
LeyD, 1983A Social Geography of the City (Harper Row, New York).
43.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999“Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527.
44.
MacLeodGJonesM, 2001, “Renewing the geography of regions”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19669–695.
45.
MarstonS, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242.
46.
MarstonSSmithN, 2001, “States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A Response to Brenner”Progress in Human Geography25615–619.
47.
ParkR, 1925, “The city: Suggestions for investigation of human behaviour in the urban environment”, in The City Eds ParkRBurgessE (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) pp 1–46.
48.
ParkRBurgessE (Eds), 1925The City (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL).
49.
ScottA J, 1988New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production and Regional Development in North America and Western Europe (Pion, London).
50.
SeabrookJ, 1984The Idea of Neighbourhood: What Local Politics Should Be About (Pluto Press, London).
51.
SennettR, 1974The Fall of Public Man (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
52.
SennettR, 1996Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life (Faber and Faber, London).
53.
ShieldsR, 1999Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics (Routledge, London).
54.
SidorovD, 2000, “National monumentalization and the politics of scale: The resurrection of the cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90548–572.
55.
SmailesA, 1955, “Some reflections on the geographical description and analysis of townscapes”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2199–115.
56.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Place (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
57.
SmithN, 1992, “Geography, difference and the politics of scale” in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences Eds DohertyJGrahamEMalekM (Macmillan, London) pp 57–79.
58.
SmithN, 1993, “Homeless/global: Scaling places”, in Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (Routledge, London) pp 87–119.
1998Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal Cm 4045 (The Stationery Office, London).
61.
2000Report of Policy Action Team 4: Neighbourhood Management.
62.
2001aNational Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Policy Action Team Audit.
63.
2001bA New Commitment to Neighbourhood Renewal—National Strategy Action Plan.
64.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London).
65.
SojaE, 1996Third Space: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real and Imagined Places (Blackwell, Oxford).
66.
SwyngedouwE, 1996, “Reconstructing citizenship, the rescaling of the state and the new authoritarianism: Closing the Belgian mines”Urban Studies331499–1521.
67.
SwyngedouwE, 1997a, “Neither global or local: ‘glocalisation’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalisation: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford, New York) pp 138–166.
68.
SwyngedouwE, 1997b, “Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics”, in Geographies of Economies Eds LeeRWillsJ (Arnold, London) pp 169–176.
69.
The Guardian1995a, “Labour and a little local difficulty”, 10 August, page 12.
