The term ‘community’ is an integral part of the discourse regarding social-service and human-service delivery in the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Yet, there are a host of meanings and goals that are part of the project of community; these meanings reflect the ambiguous position of community with respect to ideas of publicity and privacy. In this paper I explore some of those meanings and goals through the use of interviews with women who work in nonprofit, community-based organizations that support human and social services. The focus is on the ways in which the women frame the concept of community and the ways in which these may be part of a strategy to create political and material spaces for caring, empowerment, and justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsN, 1992, “Towards reconceptualizing political action”Sociological Inquiry62327–347
2.
BaechlerJ, 1993, “Individual, group, and democracy”, in Democratic Community Eds ChapmanJShapiroI (New York University Press, New York) pp 15–40
3.
BarberB, 1998A Place for Us: How to Make Society Civil and Democracy Strong (Hill and Wang, New York)
4.
BlomleyN, 1997, “Landscapes of property”Law and Society Review32567–612
5.
BrownM, 1999, “Reconceptualizing public and private in urban regime theory: governance in AIDS politics”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research2370–87
6.
ButlerJLaclauEZizekS, 2000Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (Verso, New York)
7.
CastlesS, 2000, “Underclass or exclusion: social citizenship for ethnic minorities”, in Citizenship, Community and Democracy Ed. VastaE (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 22–44
8.
CohenJ, 1995, “Rethinking privacy: the abortion controversy”, in Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy Eds WeintraubJKumarK (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 133–165
9.
CopeM, 1997, “Responsibility, regulation, and retrenchment: the end of welfare?”, in State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society Eds StaeheliLKodrasJFlintC (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 181–205
10.
CresswellT, 1996In Place/Out of Place (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
11.
DanielsA K, 1988Invisible Careers: Women Civic Leaders from the Volunteer World (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
12.
DwyerC, 1999, “Contradictions of community: questions of identity for young British Muslim women”Environment and Planning A3153–68
13.
EdwardsPEdwardsJWattsA, 1984, “Women, work and social participation”Journal of Voluntary Action Research137–22
14.
ElshtainJ B, 1995, “The displacement of politics”, in Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy Eds WeintraubJKumarK (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 166–181
15.
EtzioniA, 1993The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society (Touchstone Books, New York)
16.
FraserN, 1997Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the Postsocialist Condition (Routledge, New York)
17.
GalstonW, 1991, “Rights do not equal rightness”The Responsive Community17–8
18.
GoheenP, 1998, “Public space and the geography of the modern city”Progress in Human Geography22470–496
19.
HabermasJ, 1984The Theory of Communicative Action translated by McCarthyT (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
20.
HartleyJ, 1992The Politics of Pictures: The Creation of the Public in the Age of Popular Media (Routledge, New York)
21.
KillianT, 1998, “Public and private, power and space”, in Philosophy and Geography II, The Production of Public Space Eds LightASmithJ M (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 115–133
22.
KodrasJ E, 1997, “Restructuring the state: devolution, privatization and the geographic redistribution of power and capacity in governance”, in State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society Eds StaeheliL AKodrasJ EFlintC (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 79–96
23.
LaschC, 1988, “The communitarian critique of liberalism”, in Community in America: The Challenge of ‘Habits of the Heart’ Eds ReynoldsCNormanR (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 171–183
24.
LowM, 1999, “‘Their masters' voice’: communitarianism, civic order, and political representation”Environment and Planning A3187–111
25.
MansbridgeJ, 1993, “Feminism and democratic community”, in Democratic Community Eds ChapmanJShapiroI (New York University Press, New York) pp 339–395
26.
Mark-LawsonJSavageMWardeA, 1985, “Gender relations and local politics: struggles over welfare policies, 1918–1939”, in Localities, Class, and Gender Eds MurgatroydLSavageMShapiroDUrryJWalbySWardeAMark-LawsonJ (Pion, London) pp 195–231
27.
MarshallT H, 1950Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
28.
MillerB, 1992, “Collective action and rational choice: place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest”Economic Geography6822–42
29.
Moore MilroyBWismerS, 1994, “Communities, work and public/private sphere models”Gender, Place and Culture171–90
30.
NaplesN, 1992, “Activist mothering: cross-generational continuity in the community work of women from low-income urban neighborhoods”Gender and Society6441–463
31.
PardoM, 1995, “Doing it for the kids: Mexican American community activists, border feminists”, in Feminist Organization: Harvest of the New Women's Movement Eds FerreeM MMartinP (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 356–371
32.
ParsonsTBalesR, 1955Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process (Free Press, New York)
33.
SilkJ, 1999, “The dynamics of community, place, and identity”Environment and Planning A315–17
34.
SkocpolTAb-WeinMHowardCLehmannS, 1993, “Women's associations and the enactment of mothers' pensions in the United States”American Political Science Review87686–701
35.
SquiresJ, 1994, “Private lives, secluded places: privacy as political possibility”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12387–401
36.
StaeheliL A, 1996, “Publicity, privacy, and women's political action”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14601–619
37.
StaeheliL A, 1997, “Citizenship and the search for community”, in State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society Eds StaeheliL AKodrasJFlintC (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 60–75
38.
StaeheliL AClarkeS E, forthcoming, “The new politics work and time: structuring participation by household, work, and identity”Urban Geography24(3)
39.
StaeheliL AMartinP, 1998, “Mobilizing women, mobilizing gender: mobilizing difference?”, presented at the Royal Geographical Society/Institute of British Geographers Annual Meeting, Kingston, England; copy available from Lynn Staeheli
40.
StaeheliL AMitchellD, forthcoming, “Spaces of public and private”, in Spaces of Democracy, Eds BarnettCLowM (Sage, London)
41.
TrontoJ A, 1993Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care (Routledge, New York)
42.
WeintraubJ, 1995, “The theory and politics of the public/private distinction”, in Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy Eds WeintraubJKumarK (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 1–42
43.
WekerleG, forthcoming, “Women and the local state”, in Mapping Gender, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography Eds StaeheliL AKofmanEPeakeL (Routledge, New York)
44.
WhiteJ A, 2000Democracy, Justice, and the Welfare State: Reconstructing Public Care (Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA)
45.
WolchJ, 1990The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition (The Foundation Center, New York)
46.
YoungI, 2000Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
