In order to research the dynamics of the German model of corporate governance, data pertaining to major holdings of voting rights in listed companies between 1997 and 2001 were examined. The change that took place in this short period of time is striking, with a falling level of ownership concentration, dissolving cross-holdings, and financial sector institutions losing their position as blockholders. The concentration of voting rights is lowest in companies included in the DAX30 stock-market index. Factors affecting the types of holders of voting rights in a company include the company size, age, economic sector, and location. The analysis shows that Germany made a quick step towards some aspects of the Anglo-American system of corporate governance. However, there are also areas of strong persistence of the German model. In addition, I show that the German model is far from uniform, with different types of companies and different regions demonstrating a variety of corporate governance arrangements as well as distinctive development trajectories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarberT, 1999, “West LB told credit rating put on alert”Financial Times 10 July
2.
BarcaFBechtM, 2001The Control of Corporate Europe (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
3.
BaumannK-H, 1998, “Takeovers in Germany and EU regulation: experience and practice”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 659–682
4.
BebchukL, 1999, “A rent protection theory of corporate ownership and control”, WP 7203, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
5.
BebchukLRoeM, 1999, “A theory of path dependence in corporate governance and ownership”Stanford Law Review52121–170
6.
BechtM, 1999, “European corporate governance: trading off liquidity against control”, http://www.ssrn.com
BerglöfE, 1996, “Corporate governance”, in The European Equity Markets: A Report of the European Capital Markets Institute Ed. SteilB (Royal Institute of International Affairs, London) pp 147–184
10.
BergströmCRydqvistK, 1990, “The determinants of corporate ownership”Journal of Banking and Finance14137–153
11.
BerleA AMeansG C, 1932The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Macmillan, New York)
12.
BerndtC, 1998, “Ruhr firms between dynamic change and structural persistence: globalization, the ‘German model’ and regional place-dependence”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23331–352
13.
BernhardtW, 2000, “Acquisitions, mergers and cancellations in Germany—in the white water of shareholder value”Corporate Governance: An International Review8327–334
14.
BlommensteinH JFunkeN, 1998Institutional Investors in the New Financial Landscape (OECD, Paris)
15.
BøhrenOØdegaardB A, 2000, “The ownership structure of Norwegian firms: characteristics of an outlier”, Norwegian School of Management, http://www.ssrn.com
16.
BoltonPVonThadden E L, 1998, “Blocks, liquidity and corporate control”Journal of Finance531–26
17.
BreuerR, 1998, “The role of financial intermediaries and capital markets”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 537–550
18.
CladeraR C, 1997, “Determinants of ownership structure: a panel data approach to the Spanish case”, http://www.ssrn.com
19.
ClarkG LWójcikD, 2003, “An economic geography of global finance: ownership concentration and stock price volatility in German firms and regions”Annals of the Association of American Geographers forthcoming
20.
ClarkG LMansfieldDTickellA, 2002, “The German social market in the world of global finance: pension investment management and the limits of consensual decision making”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2791–110
21.
CoffeeJ C, 1999, “The future as history: the prospects for global convergence and its implications”, WP 144, Centre for Law and Economic Studies, Columbia University, New York
22.
CovalJ DMoskowitzT J, 1999, “Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios”Journal of Finance542045–1073
23.
DahlqvistMRobertssonG, 2001, “Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors and firm characteristics”Journal of Financial Economics59413–440
DemsetzHLehnK, 1985, “The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences”Journal of Political Economy931115–1177
26.
DoreR, 2000Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism. Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
27.
DoremusP NKellerW MPaulyL WReichS, 1998The Myth of the Global Corporation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
28.
EdwardsJFischerK, 1994Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
29.
EdwardsJNiblerM, 2000, “Corporate governance in Germany: the role of banks and ownership concentration”, http://www.ssrn.com
30.
FoxM B, 1998, “Required disclosure and corporate governance”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 701–718
31.
FranksJMayerC, 1990, “Capital markets and corporate control: a study of France, Germany and the UK”Economic Policy10191–231
32.
FranksJMayerC, 1992, “Corporate control: a synthesis of the international evidence”, unpublished paper, London Business School, London
33.
FranksJMayerC, 2001, “Ownership and control of German corporations”Review of Financial Studies14943–977
34.
GarretC S, 2001, “From consensus to conflict? The evolving institutions and values of German political economy and the implications for Europe”, paper presented at the Conference of the International Studies Association, Chicago, IL, 24 February; copy available from the author, Suite 213, Ingraham Hall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
35.
GortonGSchmidF, 1996, “Universal banking and the performance of German firms”, WP 5453, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
36.
GrinblattMKeloharju, 2001, “How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades”Journal of Finance561053–1074
37.
HerrigelG, 1996The Sources of German Industrial Power (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
38.
HoptK J, 1998, “The German two-tier board: experience, theories, reforms”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: the State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 227–259
39.
JenkinsonTLjungqvistA, 2001, “The role of hostile stakes in German corporate governance”Journal of Corporate Finance7397–446
40.
JensenM C, 1993, “The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems”Journal of Finance48831–880
41.
JürgensURuppJ, 2001The German System of Corporate Governance: Characteristics and Changes Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, available from U Jürgens, at Juergens@medea.wz-berlin.de
42.
KökeJ, 2001, “Control transfers in corporate Germany: their frequency, causes, and consequences”, Centre for European Economic Research, Manheim, http://www.ssrn.com
43.
KönigPVan der LendeE, 2000, “The pension system of ‘Germany PLC’”Global Pensions Quarterly October–November, Morgan Stanley UK Group, 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 4QA
44.
KrätkeS, 1999, “Wem gehört die Hauptstadt? Regionale Kapitalverflechtungen des Berliner Unternehmenssektors”Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie4365–75
45.
LaPorta RLopez de SilanesFShleiferAVishnyR, 1998, “Law and finance”Journal of Political Economy1061113–1155
46.
LaPorta RDe Silanes LopezFShleiferA, 1999, “Corporate ownership around the world”, Journal of Finance54471–517
47.
MajorT, 2000a, “The pillar of Germany's bank system: West LB defends the public role of Landesbanks”Financial Times 3 March
48.
Major, 2000b, “VW faces criticism over fall in shares”Financial Times 24 May
49.
MorckR K, 2000Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
50.
MSCI, 2002, “Methodology and Index Policy”, Morgan Stanley Capital International, http://www.msci.com
51.
MülbertP O, 1998, “Bank equity holdings in non-financial firms and corporate governance: the case of German universal banks”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 445–498
52.
NobesCParkerR, 2000Comparative International Accounting (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex)
53.
O'SullivanM, 2000Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
54.
O'SullivanM, 2001, National Systems of Corporate Governance, Synthesis Report, available from M O'Sullivan, at Mary.o.sullivan@insead.fr
55.
PriggeS, 1998, “A survey of German corporate governance”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 943–1045
56.
ProwseS D, 1992, “The structure of corporate ownership in Japan”Journal of Finance471121–1140
57.
ProwseS D, 1994, “BIS economic papers 41: corporate governance in an international perspective”, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel
58.
RajanR GZingalesL, 2001, “The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the 20th century”, WP 8178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
59.
Rodríguez-PoseAZademachH M, 2003, “Rising metropolis: the geography of mergers and acquisitions in Germany”Urban Studies forthcoming
60.
RoeM J, 1998, “German co-determination and German securities markets”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 361–372
61.
RoeM J, 2000, “Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control”Stanford Law Review53539–606
62.
SchmidtP J, 1998, “Disclosure and auditing: a German auditor's perspective”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 743–753
63.
Schneider-LennéE, 1994, “The role of German markets and the German universal banks, supervisory boards, and interlocking directorships”, in Capital Markets and Corporate Governance Eds DimsdaleNPrevezerN (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 284–305
64.
ShleiferAVishnyR W, 1997, “A survey of corporate governance”Journal of Financial Economics52737–783
65.
SternbergRTomásyC, 1999, “Munich as Germany's no. 1 high technology region: empirical evidence, theoretical explanations and the role of small firm/large firm relationships”Regional Studies33367–379
66.
StoryJWalterI, 1997Political Economy of Financial Integration in Europe: The Battle of the Systems (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
67.
StreeckW, 1997, “German capitalism: does it exist? Can it survive?”, in Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity Eds CrouchCStreeckW (Sage, London) pp 33–54
68.
Van der ElstC, 2000, “The equity markets, ownership structures and control: towards an international harmonisation?”, WP 2000–04, Financial Law Institute, Gent University, Gent
69.
WalterISmithR, 2000High Finance in the Euro-zone: Competing in the New European Market (Pearson Education, Harlow, Essex)
70.
WengerEKasererC, 1998, “German banks and corporate governance: a critical view”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 499–536
71.
WójcikD, 2002a, “Länder are the building blocks of the German capital market”Regional Studies36877–895
72.
WójcikD, 2002b, “Cross-border corporate ownership and capital market integration in Europe: evidence from portfolio and industrial holdings”Journal of Economic Geography2455–491
73.
WymeerschE, 1998, “A status report on corporate governance rules and practices in some continental European states”, in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research Eds HoptK JKandaHRoeM JWymeerschEPriggeS (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 1045–1200
