In this paper we attempt to assess the changes in the Turkish production structure, and labor income in particular, between the 1970s and the 1990s. During this period a shift has taken place from an inward-looking policy towards an outward-oriented one. For our analysis we use two partially closed (or extended) input–output models. The demand-driven model is traditional for this type of analysis and examines the effects of a demand pull (for example, an increase in exports). For an open economy, however, it is not only important to investigate the effects of a demand pull, but also to examine how a cost push (for example, an increase in import prices) affects total gross output, value added, or labor income, for example. To study the effects of a cost push we introduce the partially closed supply-driven input–output model. Instead of analyzing the effects of a specific exogenous demand pull or cost push, we focus on various types of multiplier.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BateyP W J, 1985, “Input–output models for regional demographic–economic analysis: some structural comparisons”Environment and Planning A1773–99
2.
BateyP W JMaddenM, 1981, “Demographic–economic forecasting within an activity–commodity framework: some theoretical considerations and empirical results”Environment and Planning A131067–1083
3.
BateyP W JMaddenM, 1983, “The modelling of demographic-economic change within the context of regional decline: analytical procedures and empirical results”Socio-Economic Planning Sciences17315–328
4.
BateyP W JWeeksM J, 1989, “The effects of household disaggregation in extended input–output models”, in Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis Eds MillerR EPolenskeK RRoseA Z (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 119–133
5.
BazzazanFBateyP W J, 2003, “The development and empirical testing of extended input–output price models”Economic Systems Research1569–86
6.
CavalcantiJ E A, 2001, “Income distributive effects in the Brazilian economy”Economic Systems Research13275–287
7.
DefournyJThorbeckeE, 1984, “Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework”Economic Journal94111–136
8.
DemanS, 1988, “Stability of supply coefficients and consistency of supply-driven and demand-driven input–output models”Environment and Planning A20811–816
9.
DewhurstJ H LlMaddenM, 2001, “The spatial decomposition of a biregional extended input–output model”, in Input–Output Analysis: Frontiers and Extensions Eds LahrM LDietzenbacherE (Palgrave, Basingstoke) pp 403–430
10.
DietzenbacherE, 1989, “On the relationship between the supply-driven and the demand-driven input–output model”Environment and Planning A211533–1539
11.
DietzenbacherE, 1997, “In vindication of the Ghosh model: a reinterpretation as a price model”Journal of Regional Science37629–651
DietzenbacherEHoenA R, 1998, “Deflation of input–output tables from the user's point of view: a heuristic approach”Review of Income and Wealth44111–122
14.
DietzenbacherEHoenA R, 1999, “Double deflation and aggregation”Environment and Planning A311695–1704
15.
GhoshA, 1958, “Input–output approach in an allocation system”Economica2558–64
16.
GroenewoldNHaggerA JMaddenJ R, 1987, “The measurement of industry employment contribution in an input–output model”Regional Studies3255–263
17.
Günlük-ŞenesenG, 1998, “An input–output analysis of employment structure in Turkey: 1973–1990”, WP 9809, Economic Research Forum, Cairo
18.
Günlük-ŞenesenGÖzarŞ, 2001, “Gender-based occupational segregation in the Turkish banking sector”, in The Economics of Women and Work in the Middle East and North Africa Ed. CinarM (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 247–267
19.
Günlük-ŞenesenGŞenesenÜ, 2001, “Reconsidering import dependency in Turkey: the breakdown of sectoral demands with respect to suppliers”Economic Systems Research13417–428
20.
HewingsG J DSonisMMaddenMKimuraY (Eds), 1999Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure: Essays in Honour of Kenichi Miyazawa (Springer, Heidelberg)
21.
KöseA HYeldanA E, 1996a, “Cok sektorlu hesaplanabilir genel denge modellerinin veri tabani uzerine notlar: Turkiye 1990 sosyal hesaplar matrisi” [Some notes on the necessary database of multisectoral computable general equilibrium models: a social accounting matrix for Turkey, 1990]ME TU Studies in Development2359–83
22.
KöseA HYeldanA E, 1996b, “Turkiye ekonomisinde sektorel Isgücü istihdami ve ucret yapisi uzerine bir deneme” [An essay on sectoral employment and wage structure of the Turkish economy], İşletme, Finans Dergisi, 11/118, İktisat, pp 11–25
23.
LenzenM, 2001, “A generalized input–output multiplier calculus for Australia”Economic Systems Research1365–92
24.
MaddenMBateyP W J, 1980, “Achieving consistency in demographic–economic forecasting”Papers of the Regional Science Association4491–106
25.
MaddenMBateyP W J, 1986, “A demographic–economic model of a metropolis”, in Population Structures and Models: Developments in Spatial Demography Eds WoodsRReesP (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 273–297
26.
MaddenMTriggA B, 1990, “Interregional migration in an extended input–output model”International Regional Science Review1365–85
27.
MillerR E, 1989, “Stability of supply coefficients and consistency of supply-driven and demand-driven input–output models: a comment”Environment and Planning A211113–1120
MiyazawaK, 1976Input–Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution (Springer, Heidelberg)
30.
OnaranÖ, 2002, “Measuring wage flexibility: the case of Turkey before and after structural adjustment”Applied Economics34767–781
31.
OnaranÖYentürkN, 2001, “Do low wages stimulate investments? An analysis of the relationship between distribution and investments in Turkish private manufacturing industry”International Review of Applied Economics15359–374
OosterhavenJ, 1988, “On the plausibility of the supply-driven input–output model”Journal of Regional Science28203–217
34.
OosterhavenJ, 1989, “The supply-driven input–output model: a new interpretation but still implausible”Journal of Regional Science29459–465
35.
PyattG, 2001, “Some early multiplier models of the relationship between income distribution and production structure”Economic Systems Research13139–163
36.
PyattGRoundJ I, 1979, “Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework”Economic Journal89850–873
37.
RoseA ZBeaumontP, 1989, “Interrelational income distribution multipliers for the US economy”, in Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis Eds MillerR EPolenskeK RRoseA Z (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 134–147
38.
State Institute of Statistics, 1994The Input–Output Structure of the Turkish Economy 1990State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry, Ankara
39.
TarpFRoland-HolstDRandJ, 2002, “Trade and income growth in Vietnam: estimates from a new social accounting matrix”Economic Systems Research14157–184
40.
TaylorL, 1979Macro Models for Developing Countries (McGraw-Hill, New York)
41.
TriggA B, 1987, “The spatial and distributional impacts of public expenditure programmes: a social accounts approach”Papers of the Regional Science Association6121–38
42.
TriggA BMaddenM, 1995, “A CGE solution to the household rigidity problem in extended input–output models”, in Social and Demographic Accounting Eds HewingsG J DMaddenM (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 145–163
43.
YeldanE, 2001Küresellesme Sürecinde Türkiye Ekonomisi [The Turkish economy in the globalization process] (Iletisim, Istanbul)
