Faced with anxieties about meeting welfare needs, and worries about the nature and meaning of citizenship, there is evidence of increasing state-initiated moves to develop the role and responsibilities of voluntary associations. Existing research suggests, however, that there are tensions between the spatial distribution of voluntary resources and welfare needs, and that the relationship between voluntary activity and active citizenship is more complex than is often acknowledged. Focusing on the voluntary welfare sector in Glasgow, the authors first examine the uneven distribution of voluntary activity across the city and its relationship to ‘need’. Although in contrast to previous research this reveals strong representation of voluntary organisations in deprived areas of the city (largely as a result of state funding programmes), important tensions and conflicts remain between where organisations are funded to provide services and the needs of vulnerable populations. In the second part of the paper the relationship between voluntarism and citizenship in Glasgow is examined. Highlighting the existence of a distinction between ‘grass-roots’ and ‘corporatist’ voluntary organisations, the authors illustrate the ways in which voluntarism can be associated with both the empowerment and the disempowerment of citizens. In the conclusions it is emphasised that developments in Glasgow resonate with wider concerns about the impact of welfare reform on the voluntary sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnheierH KSalamonL, 1999, “Volunteering in cross-national perspective: international comparisons”Law and Contemporary Problems6243–61
2.
BaileyNTurokIDochertyI, 1999Edinburgh and Glasgow: Contrasts in Competitiveness and Cohesion (University of Glasgow, Glasgow)
3.
BrownKKennySTurnerBPrinceJ, 2000Rhetorics of Welfare: Uncertainty, Choice and Voluntary Association (Macmillan, London)
4.
BrownM, 1997RePlacing Citizenship: AIDS Activism and Radical Democracy (Guilford Press, London)
5.
BrysonJ RMcGuinessMFordR G, 2002, “Chasing a ‘loose and baggy monster’: almshouses and the geography of charity”Area3448–58
6.
ClarkeJGewirtzSMcLaughlinE (Eds), 2000New Managerialism, New Welfare? (Sage, London)
7.
DeakinN, 1995, “The perils of partnership: the voluntary sector and the state 1945–1992”, in An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector Eds SmithJ DRochesterCHedleyR (Routledge, London) pp 40–65
8.
FyfeN RMilliganC, 2003, “Out of the shadows: exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism”Progress in Human Geography27397–413
9.
GCC, 1997The Council and the Voluntary Sector: Working Together for the Good of the City (Glasgow City Council Publications, Glasgow)
10.
GeigerR KWolchJ R, 1986, “A shadow state? Voluntarism in metropolitan Los Angeles”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4351–366
11.
GibbKKearnsAKeoghanMMackayDTurokI, 1998, “Revising the Scottish Area Deprivation Index”, Scottish Office Central Research Unit, St Andrew's House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
12.
Glasgow Alliance, 1999, “Creating tomorrow's Glasgow”, Glasgow Alliance, 39 St Vincent Place, Glasgow G1 2ER
13.
GRA, 1998, “Social inclusion inquiry”, draft discussion paper, Glasgow Regeneration Alliance; copy available from Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow
14.
HirstP, 1994Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Polity Press, Cambridge)
15.
KendallJ, 2000, “The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: whys and wherefores”Policy and Politics28541–562
16.
KendallJKnappM, 1995, “A loose and baggy monster: boundaries, definitions and typologies”, in An Introduction to the Voluntary Sector Eds SmithJ DRochesterCHedleyR (Routledge, London) pp 66–95
17.
KramerR, 1981Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
18.
LewisJ, 1999, “Reviewing the relationship between the voluntary sector and the state in Britain in the 1990s”Voluntas10255–270
19.
MaloneyWSmithGStokerG, 2000, “Social capital and urban governance: adding a more contextualised top-down perspective”Political Studies48802–820
20.
MarstonSStaeheliL A (Eds), 1994, “Theme issue: citizenship”Environment and Planning A26848–955
21.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, London)
22.
MitchellK, 2001, “Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state”Economy and Society30165–189
23.
MohanJGorskyM, 2001, “Don't look back? Voluntary and charitable finance of hospitals in Britain, past and present”, Office of Health Economics and Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London
24.
MorisonJ, 2000, “The government–voluntary sector compacts: governance, governmentality, and civil society”Journal of Law and Society2798–132
25.
PainterJPhiloC (Eds), 1995, “Special issue: spaces of citizenship”Political Geography14107–193
26.
PinchS, 1997Worlds of Welfare: Understanding the Changing Geographies of Social Welfare Provision (Routledge, London)
27.
PowellFGuerinD, 1997Civil Society and Social Policy (A&A Farmar, Dublin)
28.
PowellM (Ed.), 1999New Labour, New Welfare State? The ‘Third Way’ in British Social Policy (Policy Press, Bristol)
29.
PutnamR D, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civil Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
30.
PutnamR D, 1995, “Bowling alone: America's declining social capital”Journal of Democracy665–78
31.
PutnamR D, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York)
32.
SalamonL M, 1999, “The non-profit sector at the crossroads: the case of America”Voluntas105–23
33.
SalamonL M (Ed.), 2002The State of Non-profit America (Brookings Institution Press, in association with Aspen Institute, Washington, DC)
34.
Scottish Parliament, 1999, “Voluntary sector debate”, 23 September, Official Report volume 2, number 8, columns 767–804
35.
Scottish Parliament, 2002, “Report on inquiry into the voluntary sector”, paper 531, Social Justice Committee, Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh EH99 1SP
36.
StaeheliL A, 1994, “Restructuring citizenship in Pueblo, Colorado”Environment and Planning A26849–871
37.
TaylorM, 1992, “The changing role of the non-profit sector in Britain: moving towards the market”, in Government and Third Sector Ed. GidronB (Jossey Bass, San Fransisco, CA), pp 147–175
38.
TurnerB S, 2001, “The erosion of citizenship”British Journal of Sociology52189–210
39.
TurokIHopkinsN, 1998, “Competition and area selection in Scotland's new urban policy”Urban Studies352021–2061
40.
WolchJ R, 1989, “The shadow state: transformations in the voluntary sector”, in The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Eds WolchJ RDearM (Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA) pp 197–221
41.
WolchJ R, 1990The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition (The Foundation Centre, New York)
WolchJ RDinhS, 2001, “The new poor laws: welfare reform and the localization of help”Urban Geography22482–489
44.
WolchJ RGeigerR K, 1983, “The distribution of urban voluntary resources: an exploratory analysis”Environment and Planning A151067–1082
45.
WolchJ RGeigerR K, 1986, “Urban restructuring and the not-for-profit sector”Economic Geography623–18
46.
WrigglesworthRKendallJ, 2000, “The impact of the third sector in the UK: the case of social housing”, WP-10, Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics, London
