The unilateral militarism of the George W Bush administration has rekindled interest in imperialism within geography and elsewhere in the social sciences, leading some authors to refer to a new imperialism, or neo-imperialism. This paper critically interrogates the notion that the foreign policy of this administration represents a significant break from past US practices, with the use of concepts from Gramsci and Poulantzas to analyze the class and class-fractional bases of US foreign policy both during and after the Cold War. It is argued that there are certain important continuities in contemporary US imperialism and that there are also differences that owe to the present, post-Cold-War context. It is suggested that if this analysis of continuities is correct then the problems and dangers posed by the “new imperialism” may not be as readily resolvable within a capitalist framework as is suggested by various contemporary commentators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 2003, “American hegemony into American empire? Lessons from the invasion of Iraq”Antipode35871885
2.
BeckerDSklarRFriedenJ, 1987Postimperialism: International Capitalism and Development in the Late Twentieth Century (Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO)
3.
BierstekerT, 1995, “The ‘triumph’ of liberal economic ideas in the developing world”, in Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development Ed. StallingsB (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 174196
4.
BowlesSGordonDWeisskopfT, 1983Beyond the Waste Land: A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline (Doubleday, New York)
5.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002, “Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’”Antipode34349379
6.
ChomskyN, 1986Turning the Tide: US Intervention in Central America and the Search for Peace (South End Press, Boston, MA)
7.
ChomskyN, 1999aThe Fateful Triangle: Israel, the United States, and the Palestinians (South End Press, Boston, MA)
8.
ChomskyN, 1999bThe New Military Humanism: Lessons from Kosovo (Common Courage Press, Monroe, ME)
9.
ChomskyN, 2001A New Generation Draws the Line: Kosovo, East Timor, and the Standards of the West (W W Norton, New York)
10.
ChomskyN, 2003Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance (Henry Holt, New York)
CumingsB, 1990The Origins of the Korean War, Volume II: The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
13.
CumingsB, 2004North Korea: Another Country (The New Press, New York)
14.
FergusonT, 1984, “From normalcy to New Deal: Industrial structure, party competition and American public policy in the Great Depression”International Organization384194
15.
FergusonT, 1995Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-driven Political Systems (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
16.
FergusonTRogersJ, 1986Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics (Hill and Wang, New York)
17.
Gibson-GrahamJKResnickSWolffR (Eds), 2000Class and its Others (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
18.
Gibson-GrahamJKResnickSWolffR (Eds), 2001Re/presenting Class: Essays in Postmodern Marxism (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
19.
GlassmanJ, 2004, “Transnational hegemony and US labor foreign policy: Towards a Gramscian international labor geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22573593
20.
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci Eds HoareQNowell-SmithG (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
21.
GramsciA, 1995Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks edited and translated by BoothmanD (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
RobinsonW, 2002, “Transnationalisation of the state”, in Historical Materialism and Globalisation: Essays on Continuity and Change Eds RupertMSmithH (Routledge, New York), pp 210229
45.
RobinsonW, 2003Transnational Conflicts: Central America, Social Change, and Globalization (Verso, London)
46.
RupertM, 1995Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
47.
RupertM, 2000Ideologies of Globalization: Contending Visions of a New World Order (Routledge, London)
48.
RupertM, 2003, “The global justice movement in a neo-imperial moment”, in Critical Theories, International Relations and the Anti-globalization Movement Eds EschleCMaiguashaB (Routledge, London)
49.
SaidE, 1992The Question of Palestine (Vintage, New York)
50.
SandersJ, 1983Peddlers of Crisis: The Committee on the Present Danger and the Politics of Containment (South End Press, Boston, MA)
51.
ShaikhATonakEA, 1994Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
52.
ShoupLMinterW, 1977Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (Monthly Review Press, New York)
53.
SklairL, 2001The Transnational Capitalist Class (Blackwell, Oxford)
54.
SmithN, 2003American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
55.
SparkeM2003, “American empire and globalisation: Postcolonial speculations on neocolonial enframing”Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography24373389
56.
StiglitzJ, 2002Globalization and its Discontents (W W Norton, New York)
57.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, London) pp 137166
58.
ThompsonEP, 1978The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (Merlin Press, London)
59.
ToyeJ, 1987Dilemmas of Development: Reflections on the Counter-revolution in Development Theory and Policy (Blackwell, Oxford)
60.
WallersteinI, 2003The Decline of American Power: The US in a Chaotic World (The New Press, New York)
61.
WilliamsWA, 1988The Tragedy of American Diplomacy (W W Norton, New York)
62.
WilliamsWAMcCormickTGardnerLLaFeberW (Eds), 1985America in Vietnam: A Documentary History (Anchor Press, Garden City, NY)
