Since its very appearance, probably thanks to its provocative name, new economic geography (NEG) has stirred a debate on whether it is economic geography proper or rather geographical economics. In both cases, its real novelty has been questioned. We focus on this last issue. In particular, we argue that many NEG ideas have been around for a long time in the works of economic geographers and location theorists. However, NEG has the fundamental merit of having framed those ideas within a general equilibrium model encompassing most of these ideas. This has drawn economic geography and location theory from the periphery to the center of mainstream economic theory. More importantly, it has made already existing ideas more amenable to empirical scrutiny and policy analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AudretschDFeldmanM, 2004, “Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2714–2739.
2.
BaldwinR EForslidRMartinPhOttanvianoGIPRobert-NicoudF, 2003Economic Geography and Public Policy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
3.
BeckmannM J, 1976, “Spatial equilibrium in the dispersed city”, in Mathematical Land Use Theory Ed. PapageorgiouY Y (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) pp 117–125.
4.
BehrensKLamorgeseAOttavianoGIPTabuchiT, 2004, “Testing the home market effect in a multi-country world: the theory”, DP 4468, Centre for Economic Policy Research, http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP4468.asp.
5.
BrakmanSGarrenseinHVan MarrewijkC, 2001An Introduction to Geographical Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
6.
ChamberlinE H, 1933The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
7.
d'AspremontCGabszewiczJ JThisseJ-F, 1979, “On Hotelling's ‘Stability in competition’”Econometrica471045–1050.
8.
d'AspremontCGabszewiczJ JThisseJ-F, 1983, “Product differences and prices”Economics Letters1119–23.
9.
de PalmaAGinsburghVPapageorgiouY YThisseJ-F, 1985, “The principle of minimum differentiation holds under sufficient heterogeneity”Econometrica53767–781.
10.
DixitA KStiglitzJ E, 1977, “Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity”American Economic Review67297–308.
11.
DurantonGPugaD, 2004, “Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2064–2117.
12.
DurlaufS N, 2004, “Neighborhood effects”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ-F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2173–2242.
13.
EatonB CLipseyR G, 1977, “The introduction of space into the neoclassical model of value theory”, in Studies in Modern Economics Eds ArtisMNobayA (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 59–96.
14.
FujitaM, 1988, “A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: A Differentiated product approach”Regional Science and Urban Economics1887–124.
15.
FujitaMThisseJ-F, 2002Economics of Agglomeration. Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
16.
FujitaMKrugmanPVenablesA J, 1999The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions and International Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
17.
GabszewiczJ JThisseJ-F, 1986, “Spatial competition and the location of firms”, in Location Theory Eds GabszewiczJ JThisseJ-FFujitaMSchweizerU (Harwood Academic, Chur) pp 1–71.
18.
GabszewiczJ JThisseJ-F, 1992, “Location”, in Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Volume 1 Eds AumannR EHartS (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 281–304.
19.
HaigR M, 1926, “Toward an understanding of the metropolis. I. Some speculations regarding the economic basis of urban concentration”Quarterly Journal of Economics40179–208.
20.
HakimiS L, 1964, “Optimum location of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph”Operations Research13462–475.
21.
HansenPLabbéMPeetersDThisseJ-F, 1987, “Faculty location analysis”, in Systems of Cities and Facility Location Eds HansenPLabbéMPeetersDThisseJ-FHendersonJ V (Harwood Academic, Chur) pp 1–70.
22.
HarrisC, 1954, “The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States”Annals of the Association of American Geographers64315–348.
23.
HeadKMayerT, 2004, “The empirics of agglomeration and trade”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2609–2669.
24.
HeckscherE, 1918The Continental System: An Economic Interpretation (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
HendersonJ V, 1988Urban Development. Theory, Fact and Illusion (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
27.
HendersonJ VThisseJ F, 2004Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
28.
HirschmanA O, 1958The Strategy of Development (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
29.
HooverE M, 1936Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
30.
HotellingH, 1929, “Stability in competition”Economic Journal3941–57.
31.
IrwinD A, 1996Against The Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
32.
IsardW, 1956Location and Space-economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
33.
IssermanA M, 1996, “‘It's obvious, it's wrong, and anyway they said it years ago’? Paul Krugman and large cities”International Regional Science Review1937–48.
34.
KaldorN, 1935, “Market imperfection and excess capacity”Economica235–50.
35.
KaldorN, 1970, “The case for regional policies”Scottish Journal of Political Economy17337–348.
36.
KoopmansT C, 1957Three Essays on the State of Economic Science (McGraw-Hill, New York).
37.
KrugmanP R, 1991a, “Increasing returns and economic geography”Journal of Political Economy99483–499.
38.
KrugmanP R, 1991b, “History versus expectations”Quarterly Journal of Economics106651–667.
39.
KrugmanP R, 1993, “On the relationship between trade theory and location theory”Review of International Economics1110–122.
40.
KrugmanP R, 1995Development, Geography, and Economic Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
41.
KuehnA AHambugerM J, 1963, “A heuristic program for locating warehouses”Management Science9643–666.
42.
LampardE E, 1955, “The history of cities in the economically advanced areas”Economic Development and Cultural Change3321–342.
43.
LernerASingerH W, 1937, “Some notes on duopoly and spatial competition”Journal of Political Economy45145–186.
44.
LöschA, 1940Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft (Gustav Fischer, Jena); English translation The Economics of Location (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1954).
45.
LouveauxFThisseJ-FBeguinH, 1982, “Location theory and transportation costs”Regional Science and Urban Economics12529–545.
46.
MarshallA, 1890Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London), 8th edition published in 1920.
47.
MartinR, 1999, “The new ‘geographical turn’ in economics: Some critical reflections”Cambridge Journal of Economics2365–91.
48.
MatsuyamaK, 1995, “Complementarities and cumulative process in models of monopolistic competition”Journal of Economics Literature33701–729.
49.
MillJ, 1821Elements of Political Economy (Baldwin, Cradock and Joy, London).
50.
MuthR F, 1971, “Migration: Chicken or egg?”Southern Economic Journal3295–306.
51.
MyrdalG, 1957Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions (Duckworth, London).
52.
OhlinB, 1933Interregional and International Trade (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA); revised version published in 1968.
53.
OhlinBHesselbornP OWijkmanP M (Eds), 1977The International Allocation of Economic Activity (Macmillan, London).
54.
OttavianoGIP, 2003, “Regional policy in the global economy: Insights from new economic geography”Regional Studies37665–674.
55.
OttavianoGIPThisseJ F, 2004, “Agglomeration and economic geography”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2564–2608.
56.
OttavianoGIPTabuchiTThisseJ F, 2002, “Agglomeration and trade revisited”International Economic Review43409–436.
57.
PapageorgiouY YThisseJ-F, 1985, “Agglomeration as spatial interdependence between firms and households”Journal of Economic Theory3719–31.
58.
PetrieWMF, 1923Social Life in Ancient Egypt (Constable, London).
59.
PinkseJSladeM EBrettC, 2002, “Spatial price competition: A Semiparametric approach”Econometrica701111–1153.
60.
RicardoD, 1817The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (John Murray, London).
61.
Rosenstein-RodanP N, 1943, “Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe”Economic Journal53202–11.
62.
RosenthalSStrangeW, 2004, “Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4 Eds HendersonJ VThisseJ-F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 2120–2171.
63.
SakashitaN, 1967, “Production function, demand function and location theory of the firm”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association20109–129.
StahlK, 1983, “A note on the microeconomics of migration”Journal of Urban Economics14318–326.
66.
StahlK, 1987, “Theories of urban business location”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 2 Ed. MillsE S (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 759–820.
67.
StarrettD, 1978, “Market allocations of location choice in a model with free mobility”Journal of Economic Theory1721–37.
68.
StollsteimerJ F, 1963, “A working model for plant numbers and locations”Journal of Farm Economics45631–645.
69.
TellierL NPolanskyB, 1989, “The Weber problem: Frequency of different solution types and extensions to repulsive forces and dynamic processes”Journal of Regional Science29387–405.
70.
TorrensD, 1815Essay on the External Corn Trade (J Hatchard, London).
71.
UllmanE, 1941, “A theory of location for cities”American Journal of Sociology46853–864.
von ThünenJ H, 1826Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie (Perthes, Hamburg); English translation The Isolated State (Pergamon Press, Oxford.
74.
WeberA, 1909Über den Standort der Industrien (JCB Mohr, Tübingen); English translation: The Theory of the Location of Industries (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, 1929).
75.
WitzgallC, 1964, “Optimal location of a central facility: mathematical models and concepts”, Report 8388 National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
