Ecotones, such as advancing treelines, have been examined as complex self-organizing systems. Frontiers of human settlement may share some of their spatial characteristics, because they too include feedbacks between spatial pattern and process. Advancing frontiers of three study areas in the Amazonian region of Ecuador are analyzed with the aid of Landsat imagery to detect change. Power-law distributions of advancing deforestation are found, which are indicative of possible complexity. Alternative approaches in self-organized complexity, including self-organized percolation and the inverse-cascade model, and an approach to complexity involving optimization—highly optimized tolerance—are considered. Some combination of these, based on their common ancestry in percolation theory, might provide insights into population–environment interaction at settlement frontiers.
AlftineKJMalansonGP, 2004, “Directional positive feedback and pattern at an alpine tree line”Journal of Vegetation Science153–12
3.
AllenPMEnglenGSanglierM, 1986, “Self-organizing systems and the laws of socioeconomic geography”European Journal of Operational Research25127–140
4.
AnLLindermanMQiJShortridgeALiuJ, 2005, “Exploring complexity in a human–environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration”Annals of the Association of American Geographers9554–79
BattyMLongleyPA, 1994Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function (Academic Press, London)
8.
BattyMXieY, 1996, “Preliminary evidence for a theory of the fractal city”Environment and Planning A281745–1762
9.
BattyMCouclelisHEichenM, 1997, “Urban systems as cellular automata”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24159–164
10.
BenensonI, 1999, “Modeling population dynamics in the city: From a regional to a multi-agent approach”Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society3149–170
11.
BrownLASierraRSouthgateDLabaoL, 1992, “Complementary perspectives as a means of understanding regional change: Frontier settlement in the Ecuador Amazon”Environment and Planning A24939–961
12.
BrownLASierraRDiGiacintoSSmithWR, 1994, “Urban system evolution in a frontier settings”Geographical Review84249–265
13.
CarlsonJMDoyleJ, 1999, “Highly optimized tolerance: A mechanism for power laws in designed systems”Physical Review E601412–1427
14.
CarlsonJMDoyleJ, 2000, “Highly optimized tolerance: Robustness and design in complex systems”Physical Review Letters842529–2532
15.
DomanskiR, 1983, “Self-organization in spatial systems: Evolutionary problems for regional science”Papers of the Regional Science Association531–4
16.
EvansTPKelleyH, 2004, “Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change”Journal of Environmental Management7257–72
17.
EvansTPManireADe CastroFBrondizioEMcCrackenS, 2001, “A dynamic model of household decision making and parcel level landcover change in the eastern Amazon”Ecological Modeling14395–113
18.
HaagG, 1994, “The rank-size distribution of settlements as a dynamic multifractal phenomenon”Chaos, Solitons and Fractals4519–534
19.
HakenH, 1975, “Cooperative phenomena in systems far from thermal equilibrium and in nonphysical systems”Reviews of Modern Physics4767–121
20.
HollandJH, 1998Emergence: From Chaos to Order (Helix, Reading, MA)
21.
HughesBD, 1995Random Walks and Random Environments. Volume 2: Random Environments (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
KeittTHMarquetPA, 1996, “The introduced Hawaiian avifauna reconsidered: Evidence for self-organized criticality?”Journal of Theoretical Biology182161–167
24.
LevinSA, 1998, “Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems”Ecosystems1431–436
25.
LevinSA, 2003, “Complex adaptive systems: Exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable”Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society403–19
26.
LiBL, 2002, “A theoretical framework of ecological phase transitions for characterizing tree-grass dynamics”Acta Biotheoretica50141–154
27.
LungY, 1988, “Complexity and spatial dynamics modeling—from catastrophe-theory to self-organizing processes—a review of the literature”Annals of Regional Science2281–111
MalansonGP, 1999, “Considering complexity”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89746–753
30.
MalansonGP, 2003a, “Habitats, hierarchical scales, and nonlinearities: An ecological perspective on linking household and remotely sensed data on land-use/cover change”, in People and the Environment: Approaches for Linking Household and Community Surveys to Remote Sensing and GIS Eds FoxJRindfussRWalshSJMishraV (Kluwer, Dordrecht) pp 265–283
31.
MalansonGP, 2003b, “Dispersal across continuous and binary representations of landscapes”Ecological Modelling16917–24
32.
MalansonGPCramerBE, 1999, “Ants in labyrinths: Lessons for critical landscapes”The Professional Geographer51155–170
33.
ManrubiaSCSoleRV, 1996, “Self-organized criticality in rainforest dynamics”Chaos, Solitons and Fractals7523–541
34.
MansonSM, 2001, “Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory”Geoforum32405–414
35.
MansonS, 2004, “The SYPR integrative assessment model: Complexity in development”, in Integrated Land-Change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatan Eds TurnerBLGeogheganJFosterDR (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 271–291
36.
MarquetteCBilsborrowRE, 1994Population and the Environment in Developing Countries: Literature Survey and Research Bibliography (UN Population Division, New York)
37.
MasseyD, 1999, “Space–time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24261–276
38.
MessinaJPWalshSJ, 2001, “2.5 D Morphogenesis: Modeling land-use and landcover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon”Plant Ecology15675–88
39.
MilneBT, 1998, “Motivation and benefits of complex systems approaches in ecology”Ecosystems1449–456
40.
MoranEFBrondizioE, 1996, “Land use change after deforestation in Amazonia”, in People and Pixels Eds LivermanDMoranEFRindfussRRSternPC (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 94–120
41.
NepstadDCarvalhoGBarrosACAlencarACapobiancoJPBishopJMoutinhoPLefebvrePSilvaULPrinsE, 2001, “Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests”Forest Ecology and Management154395–407
42.
NRC, 1999Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change National Research Council Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Change (National Academy Press, Washington, DC)
43.
O'SullivanD, 2004, “Complexity science and human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series29282–295
44.
PanWKYWalshSJBilsborrowREFrizzelleBGErlienCMBaqueroF, 2004, “Farm-level models of spatial patterns of land use and land cover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment101117–134
45.
ParkerDCBergerTMansonSM, 2002Agent-Based Models of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change LUCC Report Series 6, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Bloomington, IN
46.
PetersonGD, 2002, “Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern”Ecosystems5329–338
47.
PhillipsJD, 1999a, “Spatial analysis in physical geography and the challenge of deterministic uncertainty”Geographical Analysis31360–372
48.
PhillipsJD, 1999b, “Divergence, convergence, and self-organization in landscapes”Annals of the Association of American Geographers89466–488
49.
PhippsM, 1989, “Dynamical behavior of cellular automata under the constraint of neighborhood coherence”Geographical Analysis21197–215
50.
PhippsMJ, 1992, “From local to global: The lesson of cellular automata”, in Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology Eds DeAngelisDLGrossLS (Academic Press, New York) pp 165–178
51.
PichónFBilsborrowRE, 1999, “Land use systems, deforestation, and demographic factors in the humid tropics: Farm-level evidence from Ecuador”, in Population and Deforestation in the Humid Tropics Eds BilsborrowRHoganD (International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Liège, Belgium) pp 175–207
52.
PrigogineI, 1997The End of Certainty (Free Press, New York)
53.
RescherN, 1998Complexity: A Philosophical Overview (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)
54.
RogersonPA, 1985, “Disequilibrium adjustment processes and chaotic dynamics”Geographical Analysis17185–198
55.
RudelTHorowitzB, 1993Tropical Deforestation: Small Farmers and Forest Clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon (Columbia University Press, New York)
56.
RyderRBrownLA, 2000, “Urban-system evolution on the frontier of the Ecuadorian Amazon”Geographical Review90511–535
57.
SapovalBRossoMGouyetJF, 1985, “The fractal nature of a diffusion front and the relation to percolation”Journal de Physique Lettres46L149–L156
58.
SarmientoFOFrolichLM, 2002, “Andean cloud forest tree lines—naturalness, agriculture and the human dimension”Mountain Research and Development22278–287
59.
ShaliziCR, 2006, “Methods and techniques in complex systems science: An overview”, in Complex Systems Science in Biomedicine Eds DeisboeckTSKreshJKeplerTB (Kluwer, Dordrecht) forthcoming
SneppenK, 1992, “Self-organized pinning and interface growth in a random medium”Physical Review Letters693539–3542
62.
SoaresBSCerqueiraGCPennachinCL, 2002, “DINAMICA—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier”Ecological Modelling154217–235
63.
SoleRVGoodwinBC, 2000Signs of Life (Basic Books, New York)
64.
SoleRVManrubiaSC, 1995, “Self-similarity in rain forests—evidence for a critical state”Physical Review E516250–6253
65.
SoleRVManrubiaSCBentonMKauffmanSBakP, 1999, “Criticality and scaling in evolutionary ecology”Trends in Ecology and Evolution14156–160
66.
SouthgateDSierraRBrownL, 1991, “The causes of tropical deforestation in Ecuador—a statistical analysis”World Development191145–1151
67.
StraussfogelD, 1991, “Modeling suburbanization as an evolutionary system dynamic”Geographical Analysis231–24
68.
TorrensPMO'SullivanD, 2001, “Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design28163–168
69.
TurcotteDL, 1990, “Implications of chaos, scale-invariance, and fractal statistics in geology”Global Planetary Change89301–308
70.
TurcotteDLRundleJB, 2002, “Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA992463–2465
71.
TurcotteDLMalamudBDMoreinGNewmanWI, 1999, “An inverse-cascade model for self-organized critical behavior”Physica A268629–643
72.
WeidlichW, 1994, “Settlement formation at the meso-scale”Chaos, Solitons and Fractals4507–518
73.
WeidlichWMunzM, 1990, “Settlement formation. 1. A dynamic theory”Annals of Regional Science2483–106
74.
WhiteREngelenG, 1994, “Urban systems dynamics and cellular automata: Fractal structures between order and chaos”Chaos, Solitons and Fractals4563–583
75.
WiensJACrawfordCSGoszJR, 1986, “Boundary dynamics—a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems”Oikos45421–427
76.
WilkinsonDBarsonyM, 1984, “Monte Carlo study of invasion percolation clusters in two and three dimensions”Journal of Physics A17L129–L135
77.
WillingerWGovindanRJaminSPaxsonVShenkerS, 2002, “Scaling phenomena in the Internet: Critically examining criticality”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA992573–2580
78.
WilsonJBAgnewADQ, 1992, “Positive-feedback switches in plant communities”Advances in Ecological Research23263–336
79.
WolpertJ, 1964, “The decision process in spatial context”Annals of the Association of American Geographers54537–558
80.
WuFLMartinD, 2002, “Urban expansion simulation of Southeast England using population surface modelling and cellular automata”Environment and Planning A341855–1876
81.
ZapperiSLauritsenKBStanleyHE, 1995, “Self-organized branching processes: Mean-field theory for avalanches”Physical Review Letters754071–4074
82.
ZengYMalansonGP, 2006, “Endogenous fractal dynamics at alpine treeline ecotones”Geographical Analysis in press
