The authors draw upon survey evidence of expert conceptualisations of the value of public knowledge in environmental decisionmaking. In the context of local air quality management in particular, they consider how experts understand the potential benefits of technological citizenship, and what status they accord to lay knowledge relative to their own roles. Evidence suggests a continuing expert-deficit model of lay knowledge, with suspicions that the public misunderstand environmental issues. Although the need for public ‘buy-in’ to the solutions to problems such as air pollution is supported, this does not translate to a more proactive engagement of lay knowledge in the assessment of such issues. Experts seem to be personally challenged by such notions. The authors discuss the need for a cultural shift in expert understanding of the value of lay knowledge, supported by a move away from an oversimplification of the need for, and value of, public participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnexRPFochtW, 2002, “Public participation in life cycle assessment and risk assessment: A shared need”Risk Analysis22861–877
2.
Anon, 2004, “The Air Quality Limit Values (Amendment) (England) Regulations, 2004”, SI No. 2588 (The Stationery Office, London)
BaumanZ, 1990, “Philosophical affinities of postmodern society”The Sociological Review38411–444
5.
BeckU, 1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London)
6.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 1999, “Clearing the smog? Public responses to air quality information”Local Environment4279–294
7.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2001, “Public understanding of air pollution: The ‘localisation’ of environmental risk”Global Environmental Change11(2) 133–145
8.
BickerstaffKWalkerG, 2002, “Risk, responsibility, and blame: An analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses”Environment and Planning A342175–2192
9.
BlakeJ, 1999, “Overcoming the ‘value–action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience”Local Environment4257–278
10.
BrooksC, 2004, The Potential for and Barriers to, Public Involvement in Environmental Decisionmaking: The Case of Local Air Quality Management unpublished PhD thesis, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
11.
BushJMoffattSDunnCE, 2001, “Keeping the public informed? Public negotiation of air quality information”Public Understanding of Science10213–239
12.
ClarkJBurgessJStirlingAStuddK, 2001, “Local outreach: The development of criteria for the evaluation of close and responsive relationships at the local level”, R&D Technical Report SWCON 204, Environment Agency, Rio House, Bristol BS32 4UD
13.
CleaverF, 2001, “Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Books, London) pp 36–55
14.
DEFRA, 2003Local Air Quality Management. Policy Guidance LAQM.PG(03)Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
15.
DETR, 2000The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland and Wales, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London)
16.
EdenS, 1998, “Environmental issues: Knowledge, uncertainty and the environment”Progress in Human Geography22425–432
17.
FearonJD, 1998, “Deliberation as discussion”, in Deliberative Democracy Ed. ElsterJ (Cambridge University Press, New York) pp 44–68
18.
FuntowiczSORavetzJR, 1991, “A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues”, in Ecological Economics Ed. ConstanzaR (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 137–152
19.
HabermasJ, 1984Theory of Communicative Rationality Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Polity Press, Cambridge)
20.
HajerMKesselringS, 1999, “Democracy in the risk society? Learning from the new politics of mobility in Munich”Environmental Politics8(3) 1–23
21.
HarrisonCMBurgessJClarkJ, 1998, “Discounted knowledges: Farmers' and residents' understanding of nature conservation goals and practices”Journal of Environmental Management54305–320
22.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2000Science and Society 3rd Report (The Stationery Office, London)
23.
HowelDMoffattSPrinceHBushJDunnCE, 2002, “Urban air quality in North-East England: Exploring the influences on local views and perceptions”Risk Analysis22121–130
24.
HowelDMoffatSBushJDunnCEPrinceH, 2003, “Public views on the link between air pollution and health in Northeast England”Environmental Research91(3) 163–171
25.
IrwinA, 1995, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development (Routledge, London)
26.
IrwinASimmonsPWalkerG, 1999, “Faulty environments and risk reasoning: The local understanding of industrial hazards”Environment and Planning A311311–1326
27.
KelayTUzzellDGaterslebenBHughesSHellawellE, 2003, “Integration of scientific and lay accounts of air pollution”, paper presented at World Congress on Risk, Brussels, 22–25 June, copy available from D Uzzell, Department of Psychology, Surrey University, Guildford, Surrey
28.
KothariU, 2001, “Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU] (Zed Books, London) pp 139–152
29.
LairdF, 1993, “Participatory analysis, democracy and technological decision-making”Science, Technology and Human Values18341–361
30.
LimogesC, 1993, “Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts”Public Understanding of Science2417–426
31.
LindblomCECohenDK, 1979Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
32.
McDanielsTLGregoryRSFieldsD, 1999, “Democratising risk management: Successful public involvement in local water management decisions”Risk Analysis19497–510
33.
MoffattSBushJDunnCHowelDPrinceH, 1999, “Public awareness of air quality and respiratory health and the impact of health advice”, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, and Department of Geography, University of Durham
34.
MuntonR, 2003, “Deliberative democracy and environmental decisionmaking”, in Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science Eds BerkhoutFLeachMScoonesI (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 109–136
35.
O'NeillJ, 2002, “Representing people, representing nature, representing the world”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy19483–500
36.
PettsJ, 1995, “Waste management strategy development: A case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management38519–536
37.
PettsJ, 1997, “The public–expert interface in local waste management decisions: Expertise, credibility and process”Public Understanding of Science6359–382
38.
PettsJ, 2001, “Evaluating the effectiveness of deliberative processes: Waste management case studies”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management44207–226
39.
PettsJ, 2003, “Barriers to deliberative participation in EIA”Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management5269–293
40.
PettsJ, 2005, “Health, responsibility, and choice: Contrasting negotiations of air pollution and immunisation information”Environment and Planning A37791–804
41.
PettsJLeachB, 2000, “Evaluating methods for public participation: Literature review”, R&D Technical Report E135, Environment Agency, Rio House, Bristol BS32 4UD
42.
PettsJHorlick-JonesTMurdockG, 2001Social Amplification of Risk: The Media and the Public Contract Research Report 329/2001 (HSE Books, Sudbury, Suffolk)
43.
PettsJWheeleySHomanJNiemeyerS, 2003Risk Literacy and the Public: MMR, Air Pollution and Mobile Phones Final Report for the Department of Health, Centre for Environmental Research and Training, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en
44.
PhillimorePMoffattS, 2004, “If we have wrong perceptions of our area, we cannot be surprised if others do as well. Representing risk in Teesside's environmental politics”Journal of Risk Research7(2) 171–184
45.
RCEP, 1998Setting Environmental Standards Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 21st report (The Stationery Office, London)
46.
RennO, 1995, “Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework”Science and Public Policy22(3)1–11
47.
RennOWeblerTRakelHDienelPJohnsonB, 1993, “Public participation in decision making: A three step procedure”Policy Sciences26191–214
48.
RennOWeblerTWiedemannP, 1995Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)
49.
StirlingA, 2004, “Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology”, in Science and Citizens Eds LeachMScoonesIWynneB (Zed Books, London)
50.
Tewdwr-JonesMAllmendingerP, 1998, “Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning”Environment and Planning A301975–1989
51.
UNECE, 1998Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental MattersUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, http://www.unece.org/env/pp/documents/cep43e.pdf
52.
UNECE, 2000The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation GuideUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva
53.
WalkerGSimoonsPWynneBIrwinA, 1998, Public Perception of Risks Associated with Major Accident Hazards (HSE Books, Sudbury, Suffolk)
54.
WeblerT, 1995, “‘Right’ discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick”, in Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Eds RennOWeblerTWiedemannP (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 35–86
55.
WynneB, 1991, “Knowledges in context”Science, Technology and Human Values16111–121
56.
WynneB, 1992, “Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science”Public Understanding of Science1281–304
57.
WynneB, 1996, “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert – lay knowledge divide”, in Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology Eds LashSBronislawSWynneB (Sage, London) pp 44–83
58.
WynneB, 2001, “Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs”Science as Culture10445–481
59.
YearleyS, 2000, “Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study”Public Understanding of Science9105–122
60.
YearleySCinderbySForresterJBaileyPRosenP, 2003, “Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study”Environmental Values12247–262
