Geographers have been arguing recently that the idea of what is ‘international’ in this field has been occupied by the hegemonic discourses of Anglo-American geography and journals. This paper takes this lively debate as an indicator of the global challenges facing higher education and research and provides an analysis of the changing conditions of knowledge production, characterised by internationalisation and competition. Knowledge production is governed to an increasing degree through practices based on market-like operations. The author argues that this may lead to the homogenisation of social science publication practices, which are known to be heterogeneous and context dependent. One indicator of this homogenisation is the demand for publishing in international journals that is arising in social sciences and humanities round the world. Both ‘international’ and ‘quality’ are increasingly being connected with the journals noted in the Institute of Scientific Information's (ISI) databases. Starting with an analysis of the changing conditions of knowledge production in general and in human geography in particular, the author scrutinises the spatial patterns of the international journal publishing spaces constituted by the ISI. The results show specific geographies: not only the manner in which the Anglo-American journals dominate the publishing space in science but also how the publishing spaces of the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities are very different. The publication space of social science journals is particularly limited to the English-speaking countries, and this is especially the case with human geography.
References
1.
AlbertM, 2003, “Universities and the market economy: The differential impact on knowledge production in sociology and economics”Higher Education45147–182.
2.
Antipode2000, “Special issue on the corporatization of university”32222–339.
3.
BarnesT J, 2001, “‘In the beginning was economic geography’—a science studies approach to disciplinary history”Progress in Human Geography25521–544.
4.
BattyM, 2003a, “Editorial: World class universities, world class research: What does it all mean”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design301–2.
5.
BattyM, 2003b, “The geography of scientific citation”Environment and Planning A35761–765.
6.
BecherT, 1989Academic Tribes and Territories (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks).
7.
BecherTTrowlerR L, 2001Academic Tribes and Territories2nd edition (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks).
8.
BeckU, 1997The Reinvention of Politics (Polity Press, Cambridge).
9.
BergL, 2001, “Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review”The Professional Geographer53511–521.
10.
BergL D, 2004, “Scaling knowledge: Towards a critical geography of critical geographies”Geoforum35553–558.
11.
BergLKearnsR, 1998, “America unlimited”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16128–132.
12.
BjarnasonTSigfusdottirI D, 2002, “Nordic impact: Article productivity and citation patterns in sixteen Nordic sociology departments”Acta Sociologica45253–267.
13.
BodmanA R, 1991, “Weavers of influence—the structure of contemporary geographic research”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series1621–37.
14.
BonnettA, 2003, “Geography as the world discipline: Connecting popular and academic geographical imaginations”Area3555–63.
15.
BootsB, 1996, “Referees as gatekeepers: Some evidence from geographical journals”Area877–85.
16.
BourdieuP, 1979Questions de Sociologie [Questions of sociology] (Éditions de Minuit, Paris).
17.
BourdieuPWacquantL, 1999, “On the cunning of imperialist reason”Theory, Culture and Society1641–58.
18.
BurbulesN CTorresC A (Eds), 2000Globalization and Education (Routledge, London).
19.
ButlerL, 2003, “Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts”Research Policy32143–155.
20.
CampbellKVickD WMurrayA DLittleG F, 1999, “Journal publishing, journal reputation, and the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise”Journal of Law and Society26470–501.
21.
CanagarajahA S, 2002A Geopolitics of Academic Writing (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
22.
CastreeN, 2002, “Border geography”Area34103–112.
23.
CastreeNSparkeM, 2000, “Professional geography and the corporatization of the university: Experiences, evaluations, and engagements”Antipode32222–229.
DebackereKGlanzelW, 2004, “Using bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of Flemish BOF-key”Scientometrics59253–276.
28.
DelantyG, 2001, “The university in the knowledge society”Organization8149–153.
29.
DemerittD, 2000, “The new social contract for science: Accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy”Antipode32308–329.
30.
DesbiensC, 2002, “Speaking in tongues, making geographies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space201–25.
31.
DunfordMPerronsDReillyBBullR, 2002, “Citations, authors and referees: Regional studies, 1981–2002”Regional Studies361053–1065.
32.
EC, 2001Key Figures 2001. Towards a European Research Area. Special edition. Indicators for Benchmarking of National Research Policies (European Commission, Brussels).
33.
EC, 2003Key Figures 2003–2004. Towards a European Research Area. Science, Technology and Innovation (European Commission, Brussels).
34.
EmelJLeyshonARobinsonJ, 2004, “A five-year plan? Providing a forum for excellence and diversity in geography”Geoforum351–4.
35.
FergusonR, 2003, “Publication practices in physical and human geography: A Comment on Nigel Thrift's ‘The future of geography’”Geoforum349–11.
36.
FloridaR, 2002The Rise of the Creative Class (Basic Books, New York.).
37.
FullerS, 2000The Governance of Science (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks).
38.
Garcia-RamonM D, 2003, “Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions”Progress in Human Geography271–5.
39.
Geoforum2004, “The spaces of critical geography”35523–558.
40.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyHSchwarzmanSScottPTrowM, 1994The New Production of Knowledge (Sage, London).
41.
GregsonNSimonsonKVaiouD, 2003, “Writing (across) Europe: On writing spaces and writing practices”European Urban and Regional Studies105–22.
42.
GutierrezJLópez-NievaP, 2001, “Are international journals of human geography really international?”Progress in Human Geography2553–69.
43.
HackettE I, 1990, “Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science”Journal of Higher Education61241–279.
44.
HakalaJ, 1998, “Internationalization of science: Views of the scientific elite in Finland”Science Studies1152–74.
45.
HakalaJ, 2002, “Internationalization of research—necessity, duty or waste of time? Academic cultures and profiles of internationalization”VEST157–32.
46.
HakalaJKaukonenENieminenMYlijokiO H, 2003Yliopisto: Tieteen kehdosta projektimyllyksi? [University: from a cradle of science to a project mill] (Gaudeamus, Helsinki).
47.
HargittaiI, 1999, “Deeds and dreams of Eugene Garfield: Interview by Istvan Hargittai”Chemical Intelligencer (October) 26–31.
48.
HenkelM, 1999, “The modernisation of research evaluation: The case of the UK”Higher Education38105–122.
49.
IngwersenPJacobsD, 2004, “South African research in selected scientific areas: Status 1981–2000”Scientometrics59405–423.
50.
JacobsJ M, 2003, “Editorial: Home rules”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28259–263.
51.
JohnstonR J, 1994, “Department size, institutional culture and research grade”Area26343–350.
52.
JohnstonR J, 2002, “Reflections on Thrift's optimism: Political strategies to implement his vision”Geoforum33421–425.
53.
JohnstonR J, 2003, “Geography: A Different sort of discipline?”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28133–141.
54.
JohnstonRPattieC, 2004, “On journal publication and professional responsibilities”Area3684–85.
55.
JohnstonR JSidawayJ, 2004a, “The trans-Atlantic connection: ‘Anglo-American’ geography reconsidered”Geojournal5915–22.
56.
JohnstonR JSidawayJ, 2004bGeography and Geographers6th edition (Arnold, London).
57.
KatzJ SMartinB R, 1997, “What is research collaboration?”Research Policy261–18.
58.
KingR, 2004The University in the Global Age (Palgrave Macmillan, London).
59.
KitchinR, 2003, “Disrupting and destabilizing Anglo-American and English-language hegemony in geography”Documents d'Análisi Geográfica4217–36.
60.
KitchinRFullerD, 2003, “Making the ‘black box’ transparent: Publishing and presenting geographic knowledge”Area35313–315.
61.
KongL, 1999, “Commentary: Asian higher education and the politics of identity”Environment and Planning A311525–1528.
62.
KortelainenT, 1999, “Kansallisesta kansainväliseksi. Tutkimus suomalaisen tieteellisen lehden kansainvälisestä diffuusiosta” [From national to international: A Study of the diffusion of a Finnish journal]Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. Ser. B humaniora31 (Oulu).
63.
KyvikSLarsenI M, 1997, “The exchange of knowledge: A Small country in the international research community”Science Communication18238–264.
64.
LashSFeatherstoneM (Eds), 2002Recognition and Difference: Politics, Identity, Multiculture (Sage, London).
65.
LaurieN, 2004, “The politics of publishing and print”Geoforum35141–142.
66.
LeclercMGagneJ, 1994, “International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science”Scientometrics31261–292.
67.
LewA A, 2002, “Internationalizing tourism geographies”Tourism Geographies4225–226.
MartinR, 1998, “Editorial: Marching towards the millennium”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23147–149.
70.
MartinR, 2001, “Editorial: Of publishers and popularizers”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series263–6.
71.
MatthiessenC WSchwarzA WFindS, 2002, “The top-level global research system, 1997–99: Centres, networks and nodality. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators”Urban Studies39903–927.
72.
MertonR K, 1973The Sociology of Science (Harper and Row, New York).
73.
MincaC, 2000, “Guest editorial: Venetian geographical praxis”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18285–289.
74.
MitchellK, 1999, “Commentary: ‘Scholarship means dollarship, or, money in the bank is the best tenure’”Environment and Planning A31381–388.
75.
MoreyA I, 2004, “Globalization and the emergence of for-profit higher education”Higher Education48131–150.
76.
Nature2002, “Editorial material: ‘Errors in citation statistics”’Nature415101.
77.
OECD, 1998University Research in Transition (OECD, Paris).
78.
OECD, 2000Science, Technology and Industry Outlook (OECD, Paris).
OldsK, 2001, “Guest editorial: Practices for ‘process geographies’: A View from within and outside the periphery”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19127–136.
81.
PaasiA, 2004, “Between national and international pressures: Contextualizing the progress of Finnish social and cultural geography”Social and Cultural Geography (forthcoming).
82.
PageS J, 2003, “Evaluating research performance in tourism: The UK experience”Tourism Management24607–622.
83.
ParkerMJaryD, 1995, “The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity”Organization2319–338.
84.
PenavaZPravdicN, 1989, “Comparative evaluation of information flow from national and international journals: An empirical study in a small country”Journal of Information Science1571–80.
85.
PhillipsonR, 2003English-only Europe? Challenging Language Policy (Routledge, London).
86.
PotterR, 2001, “Geography and development: ‘core and periphery’?”Area33422–439.
87.
PriceDJ de S, 1963Little Science, Big Science (Columbia University Press, New York).
88.
PriceDJ de S, 1986Little Science, Big Science … and Beyond (Columbia University Press, New York).
89.
PrichardCWillmottH, 1997, “Just how managed is the McUniversity?”Organization Studies18287–316.
90.
RenSRousseauR, 2004, “The role of China's English-language journals in scientific communication”Learned Publishing1799–104.
91.
RisteliL, 2003, “Sitaatioindeksin alkuvuosikymmenet ja oppihistorialliset yhteydet” [The early decades of citation index and its historical connections], unpublished MA thesis, Department of History, University of Oulu, Oulu.
92.
RobertsS M, 2000, “Realizing critical geographies of the university”Antipode32230–244.
93.
Rodríguez-PoseA, 2004, “On English as a vehicle to preserve geographical diversity”Progress in Human Geography281–4.
94.
RuivoB, 1994, “‘Phases' or ‘paradigms’ of science policy?”Science and Public Policy21157–164.
95.
SamersMSidawayJ, 2000, “Exclusions, inclusions, and occlusions in ‘Anglo-American geography’: Reflections on Minca's ‘Venetian geographical praxis’”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18663–666.
96.
SarlesH, 2001, “A vision: The idea of a university in the present age”Organization8403–415.
97.
SchoferE, 2003, “The global institutionalization of geological science, 1800 to 1990”American Sociological Review68730–759.
98.
ScholteJ A, 2000Globalization (Palgrave, New York).
99.
SheikhA, 2000, “Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: Reflections on the troubled question of authorship”Journal of Medical Ethics26422–426.
100.
ShortRBonicheAKimYLi LiP, 2001, “Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals”The Professional Geographer531–11.
101.
SidawayJ, 2000, “Recontextualizing positionality: Geographical research and academic fields of power”Antipode32260–270.
102.
SlaterD, 1992, “On the borders of social theory: Learning from other regions”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10307–327.
103.
SlaughterSLeslieL L, 1997Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD).
104.
SlaughterSLeslieL L, 2001, “Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism”Organization8154–161.
105.
SmithN, 2000, “Who rules this sausage factory?”Antipode32330–339.
106.
Society and Space2003, Guest editorials by B Braun, D Vaiou, O Yiftachel, H Sakho, S Chaturvedi, J Timar, and C Minca Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21131–168.
107.
SteniusK, 2003, “Journal impact factor—mittari joka vahvistaa tutkimusmaailman hierarkiaa” [Journal impact factor—an instrument that will strengthen the hierarchy in the world of research]Tieteessä tapahtuu number 6, 35–39.
108.
TaylorP J, 1985, “The value of a geographical perspective”, in The Future of Geography Ed. JohnstonR J (Methuen, London) pp 92–110.
109.
TeichlerU, 2004, “The changing debate on internationalization of higher education”Higher Education485–26.
110.
ThriftN, 2002, “The future of geography”Geoforum33291–298.
111.
TuomistoJ, 1999, “Sitaatio-ja impaktiluvut—isäntä vai renki?” [Citation and impact values—a master or a hired man]Duodecim115142–145.
112.
TurnerB LII, 2002, “Response to Thrift's ‘the future of geography”’Geoforum33427–429.
113.
UgoliniDCasilliC, 2003“The visibility of Italian journals”Scientometrics56345–355.
114.
VälimaaJ, 2004, “Nationalization, localisation and globalization in Finnish higher education”Higher Education4827–54.
115.
WaeverO, 1998, “The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations”International Organization52687–727.
116.
WalfordL, 2000, “The research assessment exercise: Its effects on scholarly journal publishing”Learned Publishing1349–52.
117.
WarnerJ, 2000, “A critical review of the application of citation studies to the research assessment exercises”Journal of Information Science26453–460.
118.
WebsterF, 2002Theories of the Information Society (Routledge, London).
119.
WheelerJ O, 1994, “Achievers of influence: Most cited authors in urban geography, 1980–1986”Urban Geography15503–506.
YlijokiO H, 2000, “Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying—a case study of four Finnish university departments”Higher Education39339–362.
122.
YlijokiO H, 2003, “Entangled in academic capitalism? A case-study on changing ideals and practices of university research”Higher Education45307–335.
123.
YeungHWC, 2001, “Editorial: Redressing the geographical bias in social science knowledge”Environment and Planning A332–9.
124.
YeungHWC, 2002, “Editorial: Deciphering citations”Environment and Planning A342093–2102.
