A growing number of reflective and critical voices around participatory research practices have questioned the extent to which power can be transferred to participants through such methods. In this paper I begin by reflecting on everyday difficulties using participatory methods with a group of young people who belonged to a youth forum in Stoke-on-Trent, England. These difficulties point to the way that research spaces constitute contexts which can enable the production of certain kinds of knowledge, and to the way that such contexts are influenced by other spaces where people might be asked to participate and self-represent. For my fieldwork participants, official or government-led initiatives around participation in decision making were often seen as problematic. However, I also argue that the young people drew on more embodied or experiential forms of knowledge in their activities, generated through participation in everyday collective practices and sociability. Such knowledge may not have been articulated but was nonetheless powerful. This suggests new ways of thinking about participation and empowerment, both for research projects and for other kinds of intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsadT (Ed.), 1973Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter (Ithaca Press, London)
2.
BanksM, 2001Visual Methods in Social Research (Sage, London)
3.
BarnesMNewmanJSullivanH, 2004, “Power, participation and political renewal: theoretical perspectives on public participation under New Labour in Britain”Social Politics11269–279
4.
BeazleyH, 2000, “Street boys in Yogyakarta: social and spatial exclusion in the public spaces of the city”, in A Companion to the City Eds WatsonSBridgeG (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 472–488
5.
BreitbartM, 2004, “Participatory research methods”, in Key Methods in Geography Eds CliffordNValentineG (Sage, London) pp 161–178
6.
BuckinghamD, 1991, “What are words worth? Interpreting children's talk about television”Cultural Studies5228–245
7.
ChambersR, 1983Rural Development: Putting the Last First (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
8.
ChambersR, 1997Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last (Intermediate Technology Publications, London)
9.
CleaverF, 2001, “Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Press, London) pp 36–55
10.
CliffordJMarcusG (Eds), 1986Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
11.
ClokePCrangPGoodwinPPainterJPhiloC, 2002, “Observing, participating and ethnographies”, in Practising Human Geography Eds ClokePCookICrangPGoodwinM APainterJ MPhiloC (Sage, London) pp 169–206
12.
CookeBKothariU (Eds), 2001aParticipation: The New Tyranny? (Zed Press, London)
13.
CookeBKothariU, 2001b, “The case for participation as tyranny”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Press, London) pp 1–15
14.
CraigGMayoM, 1995, “Community participation and empowerment: the human face of structural adjustment or tools for democratic transformation?”, in Community Empowerment: A Reader in Participation and Development Eds CraigGMayoM (Zed Press, London) pp 1–12
15.
CrangM, 2003, “Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see?”Progress in Human Geography27499–504
16.
CrouchD, 2001, “Spatialities and the feeling of doing”Social and Cultural Geography261–75
17.
DowlerL, 2001, “Fieldwork in the trenches: participant observation in a conflict area”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 153–164
18.
ElwoodS, 2006, “Negotiating knowledge production: the everyday inclusions, exclusions and contradictions of participatory GIS research”The Professional Geographer58197–298
19.
FoucaultM, 1980Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (The Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex)
20.
FoucaultM, 1989Foucault Live (Semiotext(e), New York)
21.
GaventaJ1993, “The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: knowledge struggles in an information age”, in Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada Eds ParkPBrydon-MillerMHallBJacksonT (Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CT) pp 21–40
22.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K, 1994, “Stuffed if I know!' Reflections on post-modern feminist social research”Gender, Place and Culture1205–224
23.
HastingsA, 1998, “Connecting linguistic structures and social practices: a discursive approach to social policy analysis”Journal of Social Policy27191–211
24.
HermanTMattinglyD, 1999, “Community, justice and the ethics of research: negotiating reciprocal research relations”, in Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain Eds ProctorJSmithD (Routledge, London) pp 209–223
25.
HollandJBlackburnJ (Eds), 1998Whose Voice? Participatory Research and Policy Change (Intermediate Technology Publications, London)
26.
ImrieRRacoM (Eds), 2003Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy (Policy Press, Bristol)
27.
IngoldT, 2000The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London)
28.
JayneM, 2001Geographies of Consumption and Urban Regeneration: The Case Study of Stoke-on-Trent unpublished PhD thesis, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent
29.
KesbyM, 2005, “Re-theorising empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: beyond tyranny to transformation”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society302037–2065
30.
KindonS, 2003, “Participatory video in geographic research: a feminist practice of looking?”Area35142–153
31.
KulickDWilsonM (Eds), 1995Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork (Routledge, London)
32.
LathamAMcCormackD, 2004, “Moving cities: rethinking the materialities of urban geographies”Progress in Human Geography28701–772
33.
LorimerH, 2005, “Cultural geography: the busyness of being ‘more than representational’”Progress in Human Geography2983–94
34.
LucasT, 1998, “Youth gangs and moral panics in Santa Cruz, California”, in Cool Places: Geographies of Youth Cultures Eds SkeltonTValentineG (Routledge, London) pp 145–160
35.
LuptonR2003Poverty Street: The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Renewal and Decline (Policy Press, Bristol)
36.
MatthewsHLimbMTaylorM, 1999, “Reclaiming the street: the discourse of curfew”Environment and Planning A311713–1730
37.
MattinglyD, 2001, “Place, teenagers and representations: lessons from a community theatre project”Social and Cultural Geography2445–459
38.
MohanG, 1999, “Not so distant, not so strange: the personal and the political in participatory research”Ethics, Place and Environment241–54
39.
MohanGStokkeK, 2000, “Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism”Third World Quarterly21247–267
40.
MosseD, 1994, “Authority, gender and knowledge: theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal”Development and Change25497–526
41.
MosseD, 2001, “‘People's knowledge’, participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Press, London) pp 16–35
42.
NastH, 1994, “Opening remarks on ‘Women in the Field’”Professional Geographer4654–66
43.
NelsonNWrightS, 1995Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice (Intermediate Technology Publications, London)
44.
NewmanJ, 2001Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (Sage, London)
45.
PainR, 2004, “Social geography: participatory research”Progress in Human Geography281–12
46.
PainRFrancisP, 2003, “Reflections on participatory research”Area3546–54
47.
ParrH, 2001, “Negotiating different ethnographic contexts and building geographic knowledges: empirical examples from mental health research”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 181–195
48.
RilesA, 2001The Network Inside Out (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
49.
RoseG, 1997, “Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics”Progress in Human Geography21305–320
50.
RoseN, 2001, “Community, citizenship and the ‘third way’”, in Citizenship and Cultural Policy Eds MeredythDMinsonJ (Sage, London) pp 1–17
51.
SandersonEKindonS, 2004, “Progress in participatory development: opening up the possibility of knowledge through progressive participation”Progress in Development Studies4114–126
52.
SieberR, 2004, “Rewiring for a GIS/2”Cartographica3925–39
53.
SkeltonT, 2000, “‘Nothing to do, nowhere to go?’: teenage girls and ‘public’ space in the Rhondda Valleys, South Wales”, in Children's Geographies: Playing, Living, Learning Eds HollowaySValentineG (Routledge, London) pp 80–99
54.
SmithS, 2001, “Doing qualitative research: from interpretation to action”, in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers: Issues and Debates Eds LimbMDwyerC (Arnold, London) pp 23–40
55.
TaylorM, 2002Public Policy in the Community (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
56.
ThriftN, 1996Spatial Formations (Sage, London)
57.
ThriftN, 1998, “The rise of soft capitalism”, in Unruly World: Globalization, Governance and Geography Eds HerodATuathailG ORobertsS (Routledge, London) pp 25–71
58.
ThriftN, 2003, “Practising ethics”, in Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research Eds PrykeMRoseGWhatmoreS (Sage, London) pp 105–121
59.
ThriftN, 2004, “Summoning life”, in Envisioning Human Geographies Eds ClokePCrangPGoodwinM (Arnold, London) pp 81–103
60.
ValentineG, 1996a, “Angels and devils: moral landscapes of childhood”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14581–599
61.
ValentineG, 1996b, “Children should be seen and not heard: the production and transgression of adults' public space”Urban Geography17205–220
62.
ValentineG, 2004Public Space and the Culture of Childhood (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
63.
WatesN, 2000The Community Planning Handbook (Earthscan, London)
64.
WhatmoreS, 2003, “Generating materials”, in Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research Eds PrykeMRoseGWhatmoreS (Sage, London) pp 89–104
65.
YoungLBarrattH, 2001, “Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children”Area33141–152
