We map the distribution of environmental grants provided by selected California foundations in 2000 and the degree of dependency of the grantees on foundation support to test theoretical claims about foundations' role in contemporary environmentalism. Contrary to assertions by critics of elitism, there is no consistent favoritism of the so-called ‘mainstream’, ‘flagship’, national environmental organizations as recipients of foundations' grants. Instead, donors support a variety of causes with varying levels of funding based on recipients' perceived expertise and needs—a finding consistent with pluralist and resource-dependency arguments. On the receiving end, we find that the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have greater reliance on foundation money are those which are younger, have fewer paying members, and are not involved in local-level or toxics issues. Overall, we find that no single theory can adequately explain the trends in giving and in dependency. Future research building on these findings can proceed along two directions: a theoretical path in search of a more universal theory of foundation giving; or an empirical path focusing on clarifying different types of NGO grantees, the longitudinal patterns of environmental giving, and the impact of foundation funding on NGO grantees.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenS, 1997a, “Environmental donors set tone: activists affected by quest for funds”The Boston Globe 20 October, page A1
2.
AllenS, 1997b, “The greening of a movement: big money is bankrolling select environmental causes”The Boston Globe 19 October, page A1
3.
ArnoldR, 1999Undue Influence: Wealthy Foundations, Grant-driven Environmental Groups, and Zealous Bureaucrats that Control Your Future (The Free Enterprise Press, Bellevue, WA)
4.
ArnoveR F, 1980, “Introduction”, in Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad Ed. ArnoveR F (G K Hall, Boston, MA) pp 1–23
BermanE H, 1983The Influence of the Carnegie, Ford, and Rockefeller Foundations on American Foreign Policy: The Ideology of Philanthropy (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
7.
BossoC J, 1995, “The color of money: environmental groups and the pathologies of fund raising”, in Interest Group Policies Eds CiglerA JLoomisB A, 4th edition (CQ Press, Washington, DC) pp 101–130
8.
BrulleR J, 2000Agency, Democracy, and Nature: The US Environmental Movement from a Critical Theory Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
ButtelF H, 2003, “Environmental sociology and the explanation of environmental reform”Organization and Environment16306–344
10.
DahlR, 1961Who Governs? (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
11.
DelfinF GJrTangS-Y, 2006, “Philanthropic strategies, in place-based, collaborative land conservation: the Packard Foundation's Conserving California Landscape Initiative”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly35405–429
12.
DomhoffG W, 2002Who Rules America? Power and Politics4th edition (McGraw-Hill, New York)
Foundation Center, 2002b, “Highlights of the Foundation Center's foundation giving trends”Foundations Today Series2002 edition, http://www.fdcenter.org
20.
FreudenbergNSteinsapirC, 1992, “Not in our backyard: the grassroots environmental movement”, in American Environmentalism: The US Environmental Movement, 1970–1990 Eds DunlapR EMertigA G (Taylor and Francis, New York) pp 27–49
21.
GonzalezG A, 2001Corporate Power and the Environment: The Political Economy of US Environmental Policy (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ)
22.
GottliebR, 1993Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement (Island Press, Washington, DC)
23.
GreeneS G, 1994, “Who's driving the environmental movement”Chronicle of Philanthropy6 (January) 6–11
24.
IngramH MColnicD HMannD E, 1997, “Interest groups and environmental policy”, in Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence Ed. LesterJ P, 2nd edition (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 115–145
25.
JenkinsJ C, 1987, “Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy”, in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook Ed. PowellW W (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) pp 296–318
26.
KarlD BKatzN, 1987, “Foundations and ruling class elites”Daedalus1161–40
27.
KnudsonT, 2001, “Fat of the land; movement's prosperity comes at a high price”Sacramento Bee 22 April, page A1
28.
LawrenceSGluckRGangulyD, 2001California Foundations: A Profile of the State's Grantmaking Community (The Foundation Center, New York, cooperation with The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy at the University of Southern California)
29.
McCloskeyM, 1992, “Twenty years of change in the environmental movement: an insider's view”, in American Environmentalism: The US Environmental Movement, 1970–1990 Eds DunlapR EMertigA G (Taylor and Francis, New York) pp 77–88
30.
MitchellR C, 1991, “From conservation to environmental movement: the development of the modern environmental lobbies”, in Government and Environmental Politics: Essayson Historical Developments Since World War Two Ed. LaceyM J (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC) pp 81–113
31.
MitchellR CMertigA GDunlapR E, 1992, “Twenty years of environmental mobilization: trends among national environmental organizations”, in American Environmentalism: The US Environmentalism Movement, 1970–1990 Eds DunlapR EMertigA G (Taylor and Francis, New York) pp 11–26
32.
MorrisonD EDunlapR E, 1986, “Environmentalism and elitism: a conceptual and empirical analysis”Environmental Management10581–589
33.
PfefferJSalancikG R, 1978The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
34.
Resources for Global Sustainability Inc, 2001Environmental Grantmaking Directory 2001 (Resources for Global Sustainability Inc, Cary, NC)
35.
ReveszR, 1999, “Environmental philanthropy and public policy”, in Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America Eds ClotfelterCErlichT (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 428–448
36.
RoelofsJ, 2003Foundations and Public Policy: The Mask of Pluralism (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
37.
SaidelJ R, 1991, “Resource interdependence: the relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations”Public Administration Review51543–553
38.
ShabecoffP, 2000Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century (Island Press, Washington, DC)
39.
ShabecoffP, 2003A Fierce Green Fire: The American Environmental Movement (Island Press, Washington, DC)
40.
SimonJ G, 1973, “Foundations and public controversy: an affirmative view”, in The Future of Foundations Ed. HeimannF F (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ) pp 58–100
41.
SnowD P, 1992Inside the Environmental Movement: Meeting the Leadership Challenge (Island Press, Washington, DC)
42.
TokarB, 1997Earth for Sale: Reclaiming Ecology in the Age of Corporate Greenwash (South End Press, Boston, MA)
43.
TrumanD B, 1993The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion2nd edition (Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley)
44.
WalkerJ, 1991Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
45.
YlvisakerP N, 1987, “Foundations and nonprofit organizations”, in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook Ed. PowellW W (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) pp 360–379
