Building on previously developed land is a top priority in Dutch compact-city policies. During the 1980s government grants supported building on these locations. In 1990 nonsubsidised housing accounted for only 5% of the housing programme for these inner-city sites. In 1995, as a result of the transformation of the welfare state in the Netherlands, the government abolished grants for the construction of social housing. This had a massive impact on the housing programme; and subsidies, as a proportion of the cost of infrastructure provision, dropped from 68% in 1990 to 30% in 2000. These changes have had a major impact on the role of municipalities and the powers they need to provide new housing on previously developed land. The municipalities' lack of powers and the new market conditions are contributing to the present stagnation of housebuilding in the Netherlands, and both of these factors influence Dutch compact-city policy.
AdairABerryJMcGrealS, 2003, “Financing property's contribution to regeneration”Urban Studies401065–1080
3.
AdamsD, 2004, “The changing regulatory environment for speculative housebuilding and the construction of core competences for brownfield development”Environment and Planning A36601–624
4.
BoelhouwerP, 2000, “Development of house prices in the Netherlands: An international perspective”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment1511–28
5.
BoelhouwerP, 2002, “Trends in Dutch housing policy and the shifting position of the social rented sector”Urban Studies39219–235
6.
BontjeM, 2003, “A ‘planner's paradise’ lost? Past, present and future of Dutch national urbanisation policy”European Urban and Regional Studies10135–151
7.
BrehenyM, 1995a, “Counter-urbanisation and sustainable urban forms”, in Cities in Competition: Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century Eds BrotchieJBattyMBlakelyEHallPNewtonP (Longman, Melbourne) pp 402–429
8.
BrehenyM, 1995b, “The compact city and transport energy consumption”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographer, New Series2081–101
9.
CBS, 2002Statistisch bestand gemeenten [Statistics database for Dutch munipalities] Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen
10.
CBS, 2005Consumentenprijsindex [Consumer Price Index], Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Voorburg/Heerlen
11.
De RooG, 2000, “Environmental conflicts in compact cities: Complexity, decisionmaking, and policy approaches”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27151–162
12.
DielemanFMWallettC, 2003, “Income differences between central cities and suburbs in Dutch urban regions”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie94265–275
13.
DielemanFMDijstMJSpitT, 1999, “Planning the compact city: The Randstad Holland Experience”European Planning Studies7605–621
14.
Ecorys-Kolpron, 2001, “Grondproductiekosten, grondopbrengsten en reuimtegebruik voor BLS” [Site production costs, site revenues and shortage of land for subsidies based on the Location-based Housing Subsidies Decree], Ecorys-Kolpron, Watermanweg 44, Rotterdam
FaludiAvan der ValkAJ, 1994Rule and Order: Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht)
17.
GordonDLA, 1997, “Financing urban waterfront redevelopment”Journal of the American Planning Association63244–265
18.
HealeyP, 1997, “The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe”, in Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe Eds HealeyPKhakeeAMotteANeedhamB (UCL Press, London) pp 3–19
19.
HealyEBirrellB, 2004Housing and Community in the Compact CityAustralian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Level 1, 114 Flinders Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000
20.
Kadaster, 2003, “Prijsontwikkeling landelijk 1997–2002 in euros” [A national Dutch survey of price developments in euros from 1997–2002], updated 28 May 2003, http://www.kadaster.nl
21.
Kolpron, 1991, “Grondproductiekosten, Grondopbrengsten en ruimtegebruik binnen BSG” [Site production costs, site revenues and land use in existing urban areas], unpublished report to the Ministerie van VROM, Kolpron Management Support Consultants, PO Box 4175, NL 3006 AD, Rotterdam
22.
Kolpron, 1996, “Grondproductiekosten, grondopbrengsten en ruimtegebruik in bestaand stedelijk gebied” [Site production costs, site revenue and land use in existing urban areas], unpublished report to the Ministerie van VROM, Kolpron Management Support Consultants, PO Box 4175, NL 3006 AD, Rotterdam
23.
AltesKorthals WK, 2002, “Local government and the decentralisation of urban regeneration policies in the Netherlands”Urban Studies391439–1452
24.
AltesKorthals WKKleineT, 1997, “Consequenties van een marktgericht woningbouwprogramma op prijsvorming stadsvernieuwingslocaties” [Impact of a market-oriented housing association programme on prices in areas undergoing urban renewal], in Handbook grondbeleid en locatieontwikkeling [Handbook on Land Policy and Development], Eds de JongJVrielinkOude GHJGroenLCAltesKorthals WKde WolffH WVerkerkG (Vuga, Den Haag) section C.542, Supplement 76, pp 183–194
25.
AltesKorthals WKNieuwenhuizenSStevensMHarkesN, 2004Organisatie van prestatie: Regie in de stedelijike ontwikkeling [The organisation of achievement: Managing urban development] (VNG Uitgeverij, The Hague)
26.
LouwEvan der KrabbenEPriemusH, 2003, “Spatial development policy: Changing roles for local and regional authorities in the Netherlands”Land Use Policy20357–366
27.
MaatKvan WeeBSteadD, 2005, “Land use and travel behaviour: Expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3233–46
28.
Ministerie van VROM [Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment], 1989Volkshuisvesting in de jaren '90: Van bouwen naar wonen [Housing in the 1990s: From construction to habitation], copy available from Ministerie van VROM, Rijnstraat 8, 2515 XP The Hague
29.
Ministerie van VROM [Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment], 1997Nota Stedelijke vernieuwing [Government paper on urban renewal], copy available from Ministerie van VROM, Rijnstraat 8, 2515 XP The Hague
30.
NeedhamB, 1997, “Land policy in the Netherlands”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie88291–296
31.
NeedhamBFaludiA, 1999, “Dutch growth management in a changing market”Planning Practice and Research14481–491
32.
NeedhamBVerhageR, 1998, “The effects of land policy: Quantity as well as quality is important”Urban Studies3525–44
33.
Neprom, 2003Conjunctuurtest Projectontwikkeling 2003 [2003 Economic test for project development] (Neprom, Voorburg)
34.
NVB, 2004, “Thermometer koopwoningen zomer 2004” [Developments in real estate sales, summer 2004 issue], Netherlands Association of Contractors, PO Box 620, 2270 AP Voorburg
35.
NVM, 2003, “Pröjsontwikkelingen over de periode 1985–2002” [Price trends from 1985 to 2002], Netherlands Association of Realtors, Nieuwegein, http://www.nvm.nl/nvm/index.jsp?navid=nvm001643
PriemusH, 1995, “How to abolish social housing: The Dutch case”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19145–155
38.
PriemusH, 2003, “Dutch housing associations: Current developments and debates”Housing Studies18327–351
39.
PriemusHLouwE, 2003, “Changes in Dutch land policy: From monopoly towards competition in the building market”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30369–378
UitermarkJ, 2003, “‘Social mixing’ and the management of disadvantaged neighbourhoods: The Dutch policy of urban restructuring revisited”Urban Studies40531–549
45.
UK Government, 2002, “The Government's response to the Transport, Local Government and the Regions Select Committee Report, ‘The need for a New European Regeneration Framework’ presented to Parliament by the Deputy Prime Minister and First Secretary of State by Command of Her Majesty”, November (The Stationery Office, London)
46.
VerhageR, 2002Local Policy for Housing Development: European Experience (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
47.
VerhageR, 2003, “The role of the public sector in urban development: Lessons from Leidsche Rijn Utrecht (the Netherlands)”Planning Theory and Practice429–44
48.
VermeijdenB, 2001, “Dutch urban renewal, transformation of the policy discourse 1960–2000”Journal of Housingand the Built Environment16203–232
49.
WilliamsK, 1999, “Urban intensification policies in England: Problems and contradictions”Land Use Policy16167–178
50.
WoodB, 1998, “Vacant land in Europe”, WP98BW1, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
51.
ZonneveldW, 1991Conceptvorming in de ruimtelijke planning: Encyclopedie van planconcepten [Formation of concepts in spatial planning: Encyclopedia of plans] (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam)
